On the first day of 2020, two errant e-scooter riders were caught by enforcement officers for riding their devices on footpaths as the ban takes full effect in Singapore.

The Land Transport Authority (LTA) took to its official Facebook page on 1 January (Wednesday) to state that these individuals were nabbed in Yishun and Sengkang.

“Our enforcement officers have started taking strict enforcement action against e-scooter users who are caught riding on footpaths. Earlier today, they were in areas such as Ang Mo Kio, Punggol, Sengkang, Sembawang and Yishun, and caught two offenders who were riding their e-scooters on footpaths,” LTA said.

It added that these offenders could be fined up to S$2,000, jailed up to three months, or both.

Since 5 November last year, e-scooters were banned on all footpaths across Singapore following a high volume of accidents involving such devices, several of which were fatal.

Senior Minister of State for Transport Lam Pin Min said that it was a “difficult decision” to prohibit e-scooters from being used on footpaths, but “it is a necessary step for pedestrians to feel safe again on public paths, while still allowing e-scooters to grow in tandem with cycling path infrastructure”.

LTA also said in a statement last year that despite “significant efforts” to regulate the use of such personal mobility devices (PMDs) using laws and to educate the public in using such devices responsibly, “offences relating to errant behaviour and incidents involving e-scooters remained on an upward trend”.

Although e-scooters are banned from being used on roads and footpaths in the Republic, but it will still be allowed on cycling paths and Park Connector Networks (PCNs).

Up till 31 December 2019, there was an advisory period where offenders were given warnings, in order to give time for e-scooter riders to adjust to the changes.

“From 1 January 2020, a zero-tolerance approach will be taken and those caught riding an e-scooter on footpaths will face regulatory action. Offenders are liable for fines up to S$2,000 and/or face imprisonment of up to 3 months, if convicted,” LTA warned.

However, bicycles and Personal Mobility Aids (PMAs) like motorised wheelchairs will not be subjected to the footpaths ban, and will also be allowed on all cycling paths and PCNs.

As expected, the ban didn’t go down too well with PMD riders, especially those who use the device as their livelihoods like food delivery riders. They vented their frustration online and even met MPs like Ang Wei Neng (Jurong GRC), Law Minister K Shanmugam and even Dr Lam.

In yesterday’s post, LTA stated that it will ramp up the construction of cycling paths and PCNs in the island to “better support active mobility”. LTA also said last year that it intends to “triple” the current distance of cycling paths from 440km by 2030, adding that all HDB towns will have a cycling path by that year.

Separately, Deliveroo has stopped assigning orders to food delivery riders who are using PMDs since yesterday.

A spokesperson told The Straits Times that existing riders who still own PMDs and have not switched vehicles or applied for LTA’s e-scooter Trade-in Grant by 31 December will not be allowed to continue working for Deliveroo until “they confirm they would like to switch vehicles”.

Upon the announcement of the ban last November, the government introduced a nationwide S$7 million programme to help food delivery riders trade-in their PMDs for alternative devices, offering a grant of up to S$1,000 per person depending on the alternative device of their choosing. The scheme received more than 3,000 applications.

This e-scooter Trade-in Grant is one part of the Transition Assistance Package (TAP), explained MOT in a press release (8 Nov).

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Remembering Dr Toh Chin Chye

~by: Dr Wong Wee Nam~ I cannot forget his kind gesture. It…

NCMP Dennis Tan proposes major improvements for the public transportation system

Speaking at Parliament yesterday (15 January), Non-Constituency MP Dennis Tan suggested crucial…

新加坡的前车之鉴:因少数精英集权终至衰亡的威尼斯

《海峡时报》前总编冯元良,在《南华早报》撰文,认为新加坡应以史为鉴,他提出800多年前的意大利城邦国家威尼斯,以商贸起家盛极一时,但晚期却因为贵族精英独揽权力,扼杀公民参与决策权,最终引致威尼斯的衰亡。 冯元良在这篇评论文章指出,首先,中世纪早期的威尼斯,之所以能崛起成为强大“海洋帝国”(威尼斯方言称为Stato da Mar),乃是因为威尼斯公民能对行政有话事权,以及可以分享国家的繁荣成果。1171年,实权总督的权力,被稀释下放给主要由商人组成的大议会。 遴选大议会成员的过程也近似民主制度。候选人提名者乃是抽签决定。提名人推举的候选人名单公布,威尼斯公民即可投票选出属意的候选人进入议会。 当代一项具显著意义的制度乃是“colleganze”,即以合股公司心事,来资助远洋商贸探险。商人发起远洋探险航程,而街上任何男性,都可以购买其中一小部分股份来牟利。 经济市场是开放的,任何精打细算的公民都可以从远行至摩洛哥和土耳其进行香料贸易的远航图利,也激发基层企业家精神。几乎没有任何官僚主义的阻,当时的威尼斯,成为该区域最大的商贸城邦国家。 那么,遥远年代的威尼斯,和今天的新加坡有何意义? 新加坡人有否足够发言权? 我认为,威尼斯的兴亡,有值得同样作为城邦国家的新加坡借鉴的地方。首先,除了大选以外,新加坡人是否有足够的发言权?如果国人对影响他们生活的政策有意见,他们的声音是否又被听到? 其二,新加坡的经济繁荣成果,有没有广泛、深入地分享给各阶层国人?如果不是,新加坡又该在不影响国家竞争力和成长前景的情况,解决这种不平等现象? 再者,即便许多保护政策都是出于善意,但这些保障和限制是否束缚了我们在面对21世纪充满变数的经济所需要的承担风险和创业拼搏精神?…