On Friday (20 December), the Straits Times (ST) forum published a letter written by a man called Lim Chuan Poh. The man penned his unhappiness upon finding out that the fee for a magnetic resonance imagining (MRI) scan at Changi General Hospital (CGH) was so much higher compared to a private imaging clinic.
Mr Lim explained that the doctor at CGH’s orthopaedic department who he consulted on 16 December, said that he needed a MRI scan to determine the severity of a “suspected rotator cuff tear”.
However, the earliest appointment for the scan at the hospital was only in late March, and he was quoted S$1,450 for it.
Since Mr Lim’s shoulder pain was causing him severe discomfort and sleepless nights, he decided to do the MRI scan at a private clinic instead. He said that he was given an almost immediate appointment and the cost of the scan was less than S$600, including goods and services tax.
“I am puzzled by the difference in charges between CGH and the private imagining clinic I went to. What is the basis for CGH charging so much more for a similar service?” he asked.
He continued, “My concern is whether, besides the MRI, general hospitals are over-charging patients for other services. I hope the hospital and the Ministry will look into reviewing healthcare charges”.

Other cases

This is not the first time a case of higher treatment price at government hospitals compared to private clinic has been reported
In July this year, TOC wrote an article about how an individual’s consultation fee at a National Healthcare Group Polyclinic was much higher than of a private clinic.

Based on the image above, the receipt on the left from a National Healthcare Group Polyclinic shows a final bill of S$13.20 after deducting the government subsidy of S$34.90. That means the total price for a consultation before subsidisation is actually S$48.10.
On the right is the consultation fee incurred when visiting a private clinic with no subsidies – S$29.90. That’s about 38% lower that the full cost of a consultation at a so-called public healthcare facility. While the final total is much lower after the subsidy, the initial fee is much higher at the polyclinic.
Separately, blogger Philip Ang Keng Hong took to his blog in July 2019 to point out that there’s no such thing as public healthcare subsidies after he found out that the consultation fee at a polyclinic is higher than a private general practitioner (GP).
The blogger said that he had first-hand experience regarding this when he underwent a minor surgery for a cyst removal.
According to the public healthcare system, Mr Ang said that he was first required to consult a polyclinic GP in order to get a referral letter to see a specialist, and this costs him S$13.
Weeks after that, he explained that as a subsidised patient, he had to pay another S$37 to consult a specialist at CGH to schedule an operation. And after the operation was over, he will have to pay an additional S$275, which is only the estimated cost.
Based on these figures, it appears that a subsidised patient will have to pay a total of S$325 for the minor surgery.
However, Mr Ang ended up doing his minor operation at a private clinic after his appointment at CGH got cancelled. He ended up paying only S$280 at the private clinic, which is significantly lower than the amount he would have paid at CGH as a subsidised patient.
According to ValueChampion, Singaporeans pays very high out-of-pocket costs for healthcare even after taking into account every subsidy and insurance coverage available. In fact, out-of-pocket costs make up almost 37% of the total healthcare expenditure in Singapore – that’s almost three times higher than the high income-country average and 1.4 times higher than the East Asia & Pacific average.
Despite such difference in cost, the Ministry of Health (MOH) has consistently maintained that healthcare is affordable thanks for the 3Ms – MediSave, MediShield and MediFund – which helps keep out-of-pocket medical costs low for individuals.
In fact, MOH has said on their Facebook page that “Singapore has come a long way as we work to build a healthcare system that is accessible, affordable and provides quality of care.” The website notes that the healthcare system in Singapore is designed to ensure that “everyone has access to different levels of healthcare in a timely, cost-effective and seamless manner.”

Subscribe
Notify of
2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

李显龙的承诺

回溯2004年8月,已故建国总理李光耀之子李显龙,正式接替吴作栋成为新加坡第三任总理。他认为这是新加坡在后冷战时代,向后独立世代的传承转变。 在当时的就职演说中,他曾表示,在全球化时代中,新加坡必须突破旧思维,采取大胆、创新的作法,因应全新的环境;也承诺营造更为开放和包容的社会。 “我们也许是个小岛国,但我们是和全球连接的国际化都会,提供令人振奋的机遇和体验。我们是开放、多元族群的大都会社会。” 他也表示将投资在青年群体,培育他们“独立思考、自信开拓、热衷追求理想”,使他们成为善良、正直的成年,提供教育机会,广开机遇和希望的大门。 他也认为,民众应有表达不同意见的自由,并乐于参加激烈辩论。 而在2004年的国庆群众大会演说,李显龙也重提同样的论述和价值观,强调政府理应鼓励民间的参与和辩论,重申营造开放和更为包容的社会。 “我们有演说者角落,允许更多的讨论。看看报章的专栏、评论,辩论的程度远超过以往甚至是国会,但我们可以做得更多。” 为实现这一目标,他认为需要拥有可信任、仰赖的领袖领导的“诚实和能干政府”;同时倡议让每个公民都能发挥潜能,一同建设和提升新加坡这个家园。 15年过去了,说话可算话? 15年过去了,看看今日在总理李显龙领导下的新加坡,可曾履行他当年的承诺和倡议? 先看看鼓励开放包容、广开言路,鼓励更为激烈的辩论,新加坡在这方面看来乏善可陈,2018/2019世界新闻自由指数中,新加坡在179国中,仅排名151。 更甭说今年国会还通过了令人诟病的“泼马”(防假消息法POFMA),尽管民间、公民组织、法律界人士已作出多次疾呼,担忧“泼马”将赋予部长更大权力,来裁定何谓假消息,缺乏制衡;担忧新法将进一步侵害言论自由,产生寒蝉效应。…

Malaysia refuses to host any events involving Israeli participants, says Foreign Minister Saifuddin Abdullah; discreet economic relations with Israel “booming” despite Malaysia’s diplomatic hostility?

Following the announcement by Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad regarding the ban…

District Judge Olivia Low now in AGC as Deputy Senior State Counsel

District Judge Olivia Low who had presided over the controversial case of…

What is the spirit of democracy?

The front page of Straits Times today quoted PAP’s candidate George Yeo…