In September, the Elections Department announced that Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong had convened the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee (EBRC) to review Singapore’s electoral boundaries ahead of the general election (GE) which must be held by 15 April 2021.
When questioned by Worker’s Party chief Pritam Singh, MP for the Aljunied GRC, in Parliament about when exactly the committee was formed, Minister for Trade and Industry Chan Chun Sing responded that it was done on 1 August.
According to the Elections Department, the committee is chaired by the Secretary to the Prime Minister and is “in the midst of deliberations”. Recommendations will be made to PM Lee once the committee completes its review.
Generally, the process of a review can take between two to four months before a report is submitted to the PM, who will then accept the report and send it to parliament. There, any changes to the electoral map are gazetted before it is made public.
Now, the time it takes between the formation of the EBRC and the report being submitted varies with each election. In 2006, the EBRC released the report in March, for which it took four months to complete its review. The timeline was similar for 2011, with the committee being formed around October 2010 and the report released in February 2011.
As for the 2015 GE, PM Lee announced that the EBRC was formed in May. The report was released only two months later, in July.
If we look at the time from when the EBRC report is released to the actual date of elections, that doesn’t vary as much. In 2006, the elections were held about two months after the boundaries were announced. Same for the 2011 and 2015 elections.
For the 2001 election, it took about one to three months between the EBRC being convened to the general election being held. The date of the committee formation back then is a little unclear. As you can see from the screengrab of news articles below from 2001, people were not expecting a general election anytime soon. In July, there was speculation that a GE would not be held until the second half of the next year since the EBRC hadn’t been set up yet at the time.

What is clear though, is that the committee’s report was released on 17 October 2001 and the election was held less than a month later on 3 November 2001.
Now, based on Singapore’s history, the current timeline between the formation of the EBRC (1 August 2019) to the yet unreleased report veering on the longer side. It’s been almost four months since the EBRC was formed, yet the findings have not been released. Why is that?
Is it because the PAP government doesn’t want to let the opposition prepare the ground earlier?
Let’s not forget what Mr Lee said at a campaign rally during the 2006 election about “fixing” the opposition:

“Right now we have Low Thia Khiang, Chiam See Tong and Steve Chia. We can deal with them. Suppose you had 10, 15, 20 Opposition members in Parliament. Instead of spending my time thinking what is the right policy for Singapore, I’m going to spend all my time thinking what’s the right way to fix them, to buy my supporters votes, how can I solve this week’s problem and forget about next year’s challenges?”

Is this yet another method of fixing by the ruling PAP to ‘fix’ the opposition?
Below is a timeline of EBRC formation, report release, parliament dissolution and nomination days for the last four GEs:

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

疑发生争执 女乘客丢手提包酿五车连环撞

一名女子疑在车上和家人发生争执,两度打开车门,甚至自车内丢下手提包,导致车子停下,后来的车子紧急刹车,酿成连环撞。丢手提包的女子也被当场逮捕,案件尚在调查中。 有关事件于周日(12日)下午4时许,在亚逸拉惹快速公路,朝市区方向、过了惹兰红山的路段发生。 根据网上流传的视频中,只见一辆香槟色的轿车在路上行驶时,两度被人打开。后方的车子见到前方车子的不对劲,就放慢速度了。 这辆轿车的左边后座车门,在亚逸拉惹路靠近新加坡国立大学的路段,就已经被打开,且没有关上。 后方车子司机见状,就怀疑车上有状况,因此报警。岂知,在车子经过惹兰红山的路段时,左后方的车门再度打开,且还有一个红色手提包被丢下车子。 后方车子当时虽然紧急刹车,但是仍然撞上,酿成五车连环撞的闹剧。 警依精神健康法逮捕女子 后方车主表示,在车祸发生后,一名女子从肇祸车子后座下来,并且对着开车的女司机大骂,反观女司机一直都没有回应,也没有下车。 警察抵达现场调查时,女司机才下车回答问题,据悉,女司机和后座女子似乎是母女关系。 女子当时表现激动,甚至无视警察身份而对他们大声怒骂,最终被警察铐上手铐带回警局。 警方今天指出,被逮捕的21岁女子,是在精神健康法令下被逮捕,庆幸的是,当时的连环撞车祸并没有导致任何伤人事件。 警方目前正在针对此案展开调查。…

新加坡总统哈莉玛和总统府厨师 月薪差距达48倍

有网民发现,总统府在求职网站招聘助理高级管家,但是招聘广告列明的月薪,仅介于1400至两千新元之间,年薪也大约有2万6000元。而扮演国家象征的新加坡总统的年薪,约为168万元(未包括花红),而月薪也至少有12万元。 假设应征者最终只领取1400至两千元之间的薪资,扣除公积金后,真正所得也只有1120至1600元之间。网民质问,这样的薪资真得足够应征有关工作者应对开销? 根据人力部2018年的各行业薪资中位数统计,一般侍应生的中位数薪资为1838元,以及侍应监工中位数薪资为2700元。 业界专业厨师中位数薪资也有3532元 而招聘网站也显示,总统府招聘厨师提供的薪资,介于2000至2500元之间。 而根据人力部的数据,专业厨师(40-49岁)中位数薪资,约为3532元,而扣除公积金后,所得也至少有2826元。 李光耀公共政策学院(LKYSPP)最近的研究,55-64岁的单身年长者,每月至少需要1721新元,来维持基本生活素质。研究指出,虽然2017年60岁及以上全职员工的月入中位数为2000元,但是同一年龄层的清洁工和劳工的月入中位数只有1200元。 假设有应征者领取约1400-1600元的薪资,不禁令人担忧,总统府提供这些管家的薪资,是否足够他们应付增长的生活开销和家庭负担。 比较白宫和新加坡总统府厨师薪资 根据2018年财年的总统府开销报告,总统府共聘用26位全职管家,比2017年的人数增加10人。至于厨师则有四位。而招聘广告要求,厨师需至少有两年相关经验、善烹煮本地或西式料理、团队良好懂合作等等。假设他们领取最高2500月薪,那么一年加上第13个月花红等,至少有3万2500元的年薪。 但我们不妨做个比较:美国总统白宫聘请的厨师,年薪约为6万6801美元,月薪也有五千多美元。 至于美国法律规定,美国总统年薪为40万美元,和白宫厨师的薪资差距约为六倍。…

Woman fined for curry puff factory in rental flat – most empathise with her

Robiah Lia Caniago. Does that name mean anything to you? Probably not.…

TOC Developing Story: Fleshing out the NTU stabbing incident

Updated 4 March, 2009. TOC investigates the background to the story. By Terence Lee & Darren Boon.