Former Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak is pictured arrives at Kuala Lumpur High Court Complex August 28, 2019 (Photo by adam yusof from Shutterstock).

Former Prime Minister of Malaysia Najib Razak has been identified by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as receiving kickbacks from bonds raised by investment bank Goldman Sachs.
According to filings by the SEC on Tuesday, millions of dollars were transferred to shell companies controlled by scandal-embroiled 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) officials. On top of that, US$1.3 million (S$1.76 million) was used to purchase jewellery from a New York jeweller for Najib’s wife Rosmah Mansor.
The filing indicated that former Goldman Sachs executive Tim Leissner misappropriated over US$2.7 billion (S$3.66 billion) of the US$6.5 billion (S$8.81 billion) in bond transactions, which was then distributed to officials in Abu Dhabi and Malaysia including Najib.
The ex-premier is currently standing trial in Malaysia on corruption charges for accepting RM42 million (S$13.76 million) from SRC International, a subsidiary of 1MDB.
The filing by the SEC added that Mr Leissner had also paid kickbacks to others who participated in the scheme as well as their family members.
“Leissner knew that a large portion of the proceeds of Project Maximus would be illegally diverted to himself and others including government officials through shell companies beneficially owned and controlled by himself and others,” SEC said.
Project Maximus is the internal code name used by Goldman Sachs for the bond issue that the bank facilitated.
“Leissner also knew at the time that Najib Razak and government officials from Abu Dhabi and 1MDB officials would receive money from the proceeds of Project Maximus that passed through various shell companies.”
“Along with Low Taek Jho or Jho Low and others, it was Leissner’s intended purpose that the payments were to flow to these government officials to influence them to execute the bond transaction with Goldman Sach.”
“A close relative of Najib Razak and a senior official with the Middle Eastern Sovereign Wealth Fund, were among others who had received some of these funds,” said the filing.
The SEC made the filing after it announced that the charges against Mr Leissner for engaging in a corruption scheme had been settled. In addition to a permanent bar from the securities industries for violating anti-bribery laws in the US, Mr Leisser is required to pay disgorgement of US$43.7 million (S$59.25 million). The amount will be offset by amounts paid in pursuant to a forfeiture order as part of a resolution in a parallel criminal action by the US Department of Justice.
Charles Cain, SEC Enforcement Division unit chief said in a statement that Mr Leissner had abused his leadership role in the investment bank by engaging in a massive bribery scheme which targeted the highest level of two foreign governments.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

解析人们要戴口罩心理 淡马亚:因不确定谁已被感染

新加坡民主党主席、也是传染病专家的淡马亚,在本月3日接受《海峡时报》采访,针对近期武汉新型冠状病毒疫情,解答群众疑惑。 其中主持人也反映网民的疑问:口罩只有身体不适才戴?难道戴口罩不也能保护那些身体健康的人士? 对此淡马亚直言,戴口罩确实能预防或减少沾染病毒的几率;但如果生病了,本就不该到处走,被潮湿了的口罩会失去防传染效率。“而如果你有感染新冠病毒的风险,都会直接被送到传染病中心进行隔离。” 他重申,生病了也不该去上班、搭地铁等,反之应戴上口罩,直接去就诊。且前往就诊前应告知医生此前是否去过中国、并避开人多密集地方等。 “假定每个人(病患)都这么做。那么健康者都不需要戴口罩,因为大部分走在街上的人都是健康的,也不会担心突然有人在你面前咳嗽传染给你。” “但现在许多人担忧,可能仍有生病的人走在外头,所以我想这点是值得注意的。” 为何身体健康的群众选择戴口罩?淡马亚认为,这可能是出于人们不确定和担忧,一些身体不适者可能还如常出外。 但他也补充,不仅是个人,整个机制也应避免那些病患和特定群体被污名化,“一旦被污名化,这些(病患)可能更不愿意出来接受就诊,这反而让更多隐瞒自身病情,可能让更多人被感染。” 淡马亚医生是国立大学医学教授,也是国大医院传染病学部高级顾问。有着传染病学研究专业背景。事实上国大(NUH)传染疾病部门,还是淡马亚在2003年创立的。 戴不戴口罩?引起坊间热议 对于到底健康者戴不戴口罩曾引起坊间剧烈争议,甚至药房手术口罩都被一扫而空,市面上很难买到口罩(不然就是需大排长龙)。不过包括总理李显龙和他的阁僚都曾提醒,除非身体不适才需戴口罩。 新加坡政府是在本月1日宣布,派发多达520万个口罩,予国内130万户家庭。平均每一户新加坡籍家庭,可获分配四个手术口罩。…

You’re invited to “Post-Election Transformation Series”

  The Online Citizen presents the “Post Election Transformation Series“. Post elections,…

国家公园局接手管理 动物之家杂费调低30巴仙

动物之家(The Animal Lodge)已在和外包管理代理公司的合约届满后,直接交由国家公园局管理,且租户杂费将调低近30巴仙。 内政部兼国家发展部高级政务次长孙雪玲昨日下午在脸书上帖文,宣布有关消息时表示,已经由国家公园局接管的动物之家,将大幅度调低租户的每月杂费。 之前设立在巴西立的动物之家,于2018年搬迁至西部双溪登雅,但是曾接获投报指该处的动物收容场地过于狭隘,且通风不良。业者也曾投诉表示,该处的装修和手续费过于昂贵,希望能够降低租金和杂费。 据悉,国家公园局在自外包公司于本月5日合约届满后,开始接手有关收容动物的设施,因此杂费收取也会随着调整。 当局表示,所提供的服务将保持不变,但是会调低非商业租户,如为被领养前的毛孩子们提供住宿的动物福利团体,每月杂费将降低30巴仙,而商业化租户的杂费也将被调低15巴仙。 孙雪玲指出,调低有关杂费,主要是希望能够帮助这些志愿福利团体管理好他们的财政。 她感谢相关团体为了保护和照顾这些小生命所做出的努力,而国家公园局也将和租户们合作,以便制定改善动物之家的计划。 她在帖文尾端表示,任何详细信息也会在一切准备妥当后再公之于众。

领袖忙抨击敦马 勿漠视本国水费调涨

随着马来西亚首相敦马哈迪重挑马新水供议题,声称这笔交易“代价太高”,随即引来我国领袖的抨击,有者要求对方遵守协议约定,也声称新加坡已经的过滤水已经过津贴,“便宜卖”给马方了。 其中,我国国会议长陈川仁就在个人脸书账号回应,新加坡不然需要回应“率性的想象”来展现对邻国的真诚友谊。 “如果我们拒绝,并不代表我们(对大马)不友善,只是为了确保这些事项公平且符合我们人民的利益。” 他一再强调,生意的基本原则是公平,法律的约束既是确保双方专业、公平,以及平等地看待此事。 在1962年协议下,马来西亚每天从柔佛河抽取2亿5千万加仑的生水,以每1000加仑仅0.03令吉的价格,售予新加坡,总值7千500令吉。 马国每日仅赚5千令吉 新加坡则将其中2巴仙(5千万加仑)经过过滤的净水,以每1000加仑50仙的价格,卖给大马。意味着马方每日以2千500令吉,从新加坡购买净水。 在扣除了买净水的费用,马来西亚每日仅从中获取5千令吉(约1千692新币)的净利。 然而,新加坡声称过滤水的成本约为每1000加仑2令吉40仙,卖给马来西亚的净水售价仅50仙,新加坡等同津贴了1令吉90仙给马来西亚。 水“从天而降”大马“白赚“? 两天前,新加坡外交部也重申,马新双方必须遵守1962年水供协议和1965年马新分离协议。 陈川仁说,马新一直是友好的邻居,在2016年柔佛面对水污染危机,被迫关闭自身的过滤水厂,新加坡也同意增加净水供应。“2015年沙巴地震,我们也有参与亚庇神山的救援活动。”…