In a Facebook post on Tuesday (17 December), the Land Transport Authority (LTA) said that additional markings have been drawn on footpaths to help electric scooter riders distinguish between footpaths and cycling paths.
The markings illustrate an e-scooter rider against a yellow background, with a red line cutting diagonally across the image.
The authority said that in support of the e-scooter bans on footpaths, these new markings have already been seen on paths in Jurong and Sembawang, and it will be progressively expand to all nine cycling towns.
The other remaining cycling towns in the Republic are Tampines, Changi-Simei, Pasir Ris, Yishun, Punggol, Ang Mo Kio and Bedok.
The cycling path networks in these towns are there to allow users of active mobility devices to move around the towns more conveniently.
“In support of the ban of e-scooters on footpaths, we have started to implement additional markings to educate path users and help them distinguish between a footpath and a cycling path,” LTA noted in its post.
It added, “These have been rolled out in estates such as Jurong and Sembawang, and will be progressively expanded to other cycling towns.”

LTA’s move comes just two weeks before the enforcement of an e-scooter ban on footpaths takes full effect.
Since 5 November this year, e-scooters were banned from all footpaths in Singapore, after Senior Minister of State for Transport Lam Pin Min announced it a day earlier in Parliament.
LTA said in a statement that despite “significant efforts” to regulate the use of such personal mobility devices (PMDs) using laws and to educate the public in using such devices responsibly, “offences relating to errant behaviour and incidents involving e-scooters remained on an upward trend”.
Following the ban, it received massive backlash from individuals, especially food-delivery PMD riders who depend on the device for their livelihood.
Although e-scooters are banned from being used on roads and footpaths in the Republic, it will still be allowed on cycling paths and Park Connector Networks (PCNs).
Those found guilty of disobeying the ban can be fined up to S$2,000 and face jail time of up to three months once the ban is strictly enforced from 2020.
From now till 31 December 2019, there will be an advisory period where offenders will be given warnings, in order to give time for e-scooter riders to adjust to the changes. Just one month after the ban kicked in, the authority said that it had issued 3,444 warnings to errant riders.
In LTA’s post on Tuesday, it said, “Remember that e-scooters are not allowed to be ridden on footpaths and we will strictly enforce against anyone caught doing so from 1 Jan 2020.”
Moving forward, e-scooter riders will also be required to pass a theory test and be of a minimum of 16 years old to be riding on cycling paths. Those who are under the age of 16 will have to be supervised by adults.
This move comes after the Government said on 4 December that it has passed all recommendations brought forward by a panel studying the use of the devices.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

曾有高层涉贪的新科海事是否有被施以禁商令?为期多久?

政府有个禁令裁定常设委员会(SCOD),由财政部副秘书长任主席,贪污调查局(CPIB)负责调查贪腐行为。如经调查涉贪属实,贪污调查局可建议委会对有关涉贪的企业或机构施以禁令,使之不得踏足和参与任何形式的生意业务。 禁令委会的成员,包括来自不同部门的秘书、总检察长/副检察长,以及贪污调查局总监/副总监组成。 公共机构会提交投诉,该委会则根据相关政府机构,因违规招标等情况蒙受的损失,酌情裁定对有关违规单位,施以一定时期的禁令。 禁令对有关涉贪的招标承包商公司、高层董事、其业务伙伴都有约束力。 至于在2014年,被揭发高达七名高层涉行贿、报假账的新科海事(ST Marine),可说是近几年来在本国发生的最严重贪腐事件。 但虽然被揭发、且涉事高层也被定罪,然而这家在淡马锡控股旗下新科工程(ST Engineering)的子公司,仍能参与在2017年7月,内政部的警察海岸卫队巡艇工程招标。 新科海事在2018年7月成功取得工程合约,合约报价达到3亿1270万元,且比原本的预算还要高出55巴仙。 事实上,新科海事在参与招标时,有关涉事的前高层才刚刚在2017年中旬被定罪。 故此,我们可以质问,禁令裁定委会对于新科海事的立场如何?何以该公司即使卷入前高层涉贪风波,仍能在前高层被法庭定罪的同一年,参与政府招标工程?新科海事在此前的贪污风波,被施以多久的禁令? 本社也已致函询问禁令裁定委会以澄清此事。…

潜逃几率高 不获保释 王赐安再增13欺诈罪名

自上周依据刑事法典第468条文下,增加了八项涉嫌参与未经授权,总值1600万新元交易的指控后,王赐安律师于昨日(6月20日)再增加13项欺诈罪。 法庭获悉王赐安于上个月,被马来西亚警方协助新加坡商业事务局(CAD)要求下,在吉隆坡被逮捕。他是使用了一个与他年龄相仿人士的被盗马来西亚护照,成功骗过大士关卡,逃出国到马来西亚。 副检察官(DPP)Nicholas Khoo告诉法庭,王赐安已经处理了他的手机,并将SIM卡换到了另一部新手机上,他也居住在两个不需要信用卡付费的地方,一个是其友人的办公室,另一个则是吉隆坡蕉赖的辉煌酒店(Vivatel Hotel)。 Nicholas Khoo说,为了逮捕王赐安,将他带回国,近乎使劲法宝,甚至需要动用海外发出逮捕令。 虽然王赐安的辩护律师Jennifer Sia要求保释,让他能够花一些时间陪其两岁的儿子,及解决一些个人事务,但是Nicholas认为法庭不应该批准王赐安的保释,因为他很有可能潜逃。 法庭驳回了辩护律师的保释请求。 一名调查员在Nicholas提出的宣誓书中警告说,如果王赐安获得保释,他可能会潜逃,并表示被告所犯下的欺诈计划和复杂程度,远远超过了最初由警方报案书所陈述的。 根据《今日报》报导,…

疑似费雷拉账号爆料 坚称自己08年非艾滋病患 卫生部艾滋数据库曾遭骇

脸书上出现一个疑似费雷拉(Mikhy Ferrera Brochez)的账号,于今早发布贴文,坚称自己在2008年未被确诊艾滋病阳性,并指责新加坡卫生部的艾滋数据库确实在2012年被骇和遭篡改,因为使用过时的软件、缺乏密码保护和加密。 他指责他的伴侣吕德祥被当成代罪羊,他们俩在公众前的形象也被妖魔化。 他也出示一份美国医生的信函,佐证自己目前的血液测试显示其健康都属正常,如果他有艾滋,那么十年来不接受HAART抗反转录病毒治疗之下还能生存是不可能的。 与此同时,在五小时前的贴文,费雷拉也宣称自己正联系美国议员,新加坡并没有寻求美方机构的合作,反之因为他的事件,造成新美两国关系裂痕,且也拒绝了美方外交请求,接触其丈夫吕德祥医生。 他说他正在华盛顿与多位官员会面,每个人都告诉他“新加坡不会与他们合作。” “静候颜金勇答复” 当本社在脸书留言询问费雷拉,是否愿针对我国卫生部的指控透露更多,后者表示会继续更新信息,“不愿再有更多关于他和其丈夫的谎言继续散播”,也指出当权者似乎选错人来当代罪羊,他说会分享更多消息,但就目前,他将“静候卫生部长颜金勇的答复。” 根据昨日颜金勇的国会声明,费雷拉指控吕德祥把他的艾滋病状况截图分享给他人。惟卫生部官员多次找他协助调查,后者不太合作也多次回避,即无法给出实质的证据,甚至还威胁要离开新加坡,不想再继续调查下去。 费雷拉否认自己涉及盗窃艾滋资料,并指当初涉及泄露资料是另一名为Levine的洋汉和印尼人,其中那名洋汉与吕德祥有染,试图说服吕德祥离开费雷拉,但最终失败。 他说,不甘心的Levine数次擅闯他么住家还偷走了吕德祥的工作电脑,并指是Levine泄露了病患资料。…

法国品牌Moule Bouchot疑含有大肠杆菌,食品局下令召回

法国品牌Moule Bouchot的贻贝,疑含有大肠杆菌,因此食品局进口商召回该产品。 食品局昨日(10月1日)发文告表示,因疑似含有高度的大肠杆菌,欧盟食品和饲料快速通报系统(RASFF)已召回法国品牌Moule Bouchot的贻贝(mussels),其中包括5公斤和10公斤包装,批次标记是M 19 39 3 CAO。 而上述产品亦进口到我国,故食品局已要求进口商Elite Fine Food LLP召回该产品。目前相关受影响产品已召回,而且并为在我国零售市场出售。