(Image from Progress Party Singapore / Facebook)

On Tuesday (10 December) the Progress Singapore Party (PSP) calls for Courts of Singapore to be the authority that declares a piece of news as falsehood and impose corresponding penalties to ensure that POFMA is in line with the value of ‘independence’.
In a statement on their website, PSP emphasised that the party is founded on the tenets of transparency, independence and accountability which it feels the current POFMA “falls short”.
“Currently, POFMA empowers the Minister to declare a piece of news to be falsehood, without requiring any justification, criteria or standards,” said PSP.
“This does not measure up to the standards of Transparency and Accountability. And where the news involves the Government, it also fails the standard of Independence,” it added.
The party went on to outline three scenarios from which online falsehoods can arise starting with guesses made based on limited information due to facts, statistics and data not made readily available and accessible to the public. The second scenario involves negligence or failure of purveyors of news to fact-check; while the third involved the purveyor intentionally setting out to mislead their audience with deliberate falsehoods.
Agreeing that the government needs to act speedily in curbing the viral spread of fake news, PSP voiced its support on the need for Ministers to be empowered to demand that news purveyors post a link to a site which includes facts from the government in order “to swiftly stop the spread of misinformation”.
However, the party also said: “to declare any news as falsehood and to impose any penalties thereof, PSP is of the view that it should be done by the Courts of Singapore for Independence.”
The statement goes on to explain that the Courts have an established system and precedence for determining falsehoods given that it handles cases like fraud. This would ensure transparency and accountability, said PSP.
Currently, any minister is empowered to declare a statement as misleading or a false statement of fact and issue a correction order or takedown for that particular statement. The order can be challenged by the affected party by first appealing to the minister who issued the order. Once the minister rejects the appeal, the challenge can be brought to the High Court to either vary or cancel the order.
According to the provisions in POFMA, the High Court can only decide whether the statement declared by a minister to be false is, in fact, false. The Court cannot judge on whether the minister’s original declaration and/or order of removal was made ‘in the public interest’ as the law outlines.

PSP’s Brad Bowyer the first to be POFMA’d

On 25 November, PSP member Brad Bowyer was the first to receive a correction order issued under POFMA for a post he made on Facebook about government finances relating to investments. The order was issued upon the direction of Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance Heng Swee Keat.
Complying with the order, Mr Bowyer included a statement to the top of the offending post to say that the post ‘contains false statement of facts’ and provided a link which led to the government’s ‘factually’ website which states the administration’s position on the statements Mr Bowyer made.
Following the correction, Mr Bowyer published another Facebook post explaining why he complied with the order. He said, “I have no problem in following that request as I feel it is fair to have both points of view and clarifications and corrections of fact when necessary.”
He added that he does his best to use public facts and make informed statements of opinions based on the details he has access to, saying that he does not have anything against being asked to make corrections or clarifications, especially in the public interest.
He then went on to express his personal feelings about POFMA, stating that he felt it was rushed through parliament and poses many opportunities for misuse despite the government’s assurances that that won’t happen.
Mr Bowyer said, “Indeed they said as much at the time in their public statements and I take them their word although I still feel the situation was not that urgent that a more considered piece of legislation could have been enacted after more vigorous debate and evaluation.”
He then added, “This will in no way impact my resolve or desire to do what I feel I can to improve our social and political discourse and how Singapore is governed and develops both now and in the future.”
“A responsible and vocal citizenry is as much a vital part of our democratic nation as is a responsible and listening government,” concluded Mr Bowyer.
A few days later after a second correction order was issued under POFMA – this time to States Times Review editor Alex Tan – Mr Bowyer noted that while he did comply with the correction order, that doesn’t mean he won’t appeal. He said, “Currently, I am still studying the final implementation of the legislation and its processes and so reserve my right to appeal at the appropriate time and in the appropriate manner.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Deconstructing democracy and freedom of speech

~ By Ghui ~ With the possibility of a by-election looming and…

49 new cases of COVID infection in Singapore; 18 out of 38 community cases unlinked

As of Sunday (16 May ) 12pm, the Ministry of Health (MOH)…

黄循财:考虑放宽公积金购屋限制 让国人可购买旧组屋

国家发展部长黄循财在昨日(3月7日),参与国会拨款委员会辩论国家发展部开支预算,提及政府考虑放宽使用中央公积金,购买旧的重售组屋限制, 预期将在今年五月公布政策调整详情。 他说,看了一部题为《有楼万事足》的香港纪录片,指出香港年轻人难以圆拥屋梦,当地最便宜的三房式组屋等同44万新元,比新加坡的还贵一倍。他借此传达,相比香港,在我国买房子“并不难”。 黄循财也公布政府有意进行一系列措施,让民众更容易拥屋。 至于等候组屋抽签结果的时间,则从六周减缩到三周;同时会提前半年公布下来推出的预购组屋地点,以方便买家作更明智的购屋申请。 目前用公积金购旧组屋有限制 民众若要购买屋契仅剩60年的组屋,动用公积金会有一定的限制。一些银行也会依据这些限制,来决定贷款的期限。但是,市场上100万间组屋中,有九万间都是屋龄超过40年的组屋。 他提到,公积金的政策乃是确保公积金会员仍有足够的养老储蓄,不过这些限制也带来一些掣肘。 “例如,某买家有意动用全额公积金,购买屋龄39年的组屋,但是到了第二年,可以动用的公积金就会受限。”黄循财认为,屋龄只不过一年之隔,没有理由就要面对限制。 他认为,不应把中心放在组屋屋契的期限,而是确保买家可以买到足够他们终身使用的组屋。所以,即使屋龄少过60年,也应放宽动用公积金的限制。 屋契剩35年屋价走下坡 不过,有分析师曾警告,公共组屋跨过64岁的门槛(屋契期期限少过35年),屋价可能就逐步走下坡;屋龄到69岁(屋契剩30年),就不能用公积金来支付这种高龄组屋的头期。…

Singapore VS Jordan: Do-or-die Mission for Our Lions

Damon Yeo/ After losing the first two matches of the 2014 FIFA…