A Singaporean mother took to her Facebook on Tuesday (3 December) to slam Jewel Changi for the double standard treatment that her son got, as opposed to a local celebrity’s child.
Kailin Ng said that her son was not allowed to enter the snow walk as he wore a pair of sandals, which was deemed “improper footwear”.
However, her son, Aden’s, sandals were similar of those adorned by a Singaporean celebrity DJ’s son a few days later. She said that the DJ’s son was granted access to the snow walk.
“Went to Jewels a couple of times by now, was attracted to the beautiful landscape and lightings within the mall and to know that they added extra features to the canopy walk was a bonus,” Ng wrote.
She added, “Brought my excited Aden along, but was denied entry to this part of the park, ‘the snow walk’ due to improper footwear. Aden was wearing sandals (like below). Lucky for me, Aden was understanding. He left that part of the walk saying to me ‘it’s ok, I’m still happy’”.
However, Ng said that not allowing such footwear in the walk did not “baffle” her as much as seeing a picture of the DJ’s son at the very same walk a few days later.
“What baffles me is not that such footwear is not allowed to the walk, but the very next couple of days this picture of Singapore celebrity DJ was posted and her son was allowed entry for the very reason why Aden was not allowed,” she noted.
As such, she asked if the “rules are not strictly followed” or if the rules are only applied to “common folks”?

In the comment section of Ng’s post, she noted that she got in touch with the management of Jewel Changi regarding this incident and is yet to get a reply from them.
TOC has also reached out to Changi Airport for their comment on this matter.
Many netizens also slammed Jewel Changi for their special treatment, and stated that Singapore has two sets of rules and regulations, one for commoners and the other one is for elite and celebrities.
 


Others questioned the double standard, while one netizen added that people should not visit Jewel Changi Airport due to the way they treat people. Eugena Lee wrote, “Keep promoting them when they don’t even give a damn of how they wanted to treat you like shits from the start!!” 
A bunch of them also demanded Jewel Changi to provide them with an answer for this case.


Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

林学芬代表律师团呈21页辩词 撼总检署500页投诉

李显扬妻子林学芬的律师代表团队,针对总检察署投诉林学芬“行为失当”的指控,已提呈21页的辩词。 今年初,总检察署针对李显扬妻子林学芬,为建国总理李光耀准备遗嘱一事,向新加坡律师公会提呈逾500页的投诉信。 总理弟弟李显扬是于今日在脸书更新有关诉讼的进展。他指出总检察署的投诉,也重复了过去李显龙在“神秘的部长委员会”作出的指控。 他不忘揶揄,如果总理李显龙对父亲遗嘱有意见,当年何不与父亲及弟妹们坐下来讨论,更何况他那时身旁有私人律师黄鲁胜(现任总检察长),这么久以来都没有提出投诉。 总检察署指林学芬作为专业律师,在为李光耀准备遗嘱一事,有失职之嫌的表面证据,表面触犯法律专业(专业行为规章)第25节条文和第46节条文。 准则列明律师应该避免陷入利益冲突中。 当局认为,林学芬在李光耀最后一份遗嘱,以李显扬作为受益人的情况下准备遗嘱,并安排李光耀执行,而李显扬获得的份额有增加。 同时,总检察署解释,把林学芬可能专业行为失当的个案提呈律师公会,与当局处理其他类似事件的做法一致。 但此前李显扬已回应,其妻子从未担任李光耀的律师,父亲的遗嘱在五年前就已执行。当父亲完成遗嘱后,告知全家和他的律师,遗嘱由李&李律师事务所保管。 而早在本周一(8日),李显扬也宣布前总检察长温长明教授,已同意代表其妻子林学芬进行辩护。 过去,李显扬曾抨击指部长委员会“即不透明也不恰当”,也称李显龙企图以委员会绕过司法制度。他也人物李显龙通过其阁僚组成的委员会,处理他对“私人家事”的不满。 “这(委员会)没经过司法程序的秘密攻击,旨在削弱我们父亲最后一份遗嘱,及他毫不动摇的遗愿。”

新中天津生态城10周年人口逾十万 仅达明年目标三分一

我国副总理张志贤在昨天结束为期六天访华行程,在接受媒体访问时,提及随着新中关系步入下一阶段,对接中国区域发展的合作,将成为两国关系发展更突出的要素。 他说新中关系在明年即将迎来30周年纪念,自1994年两国即开启政府间合作(G2G)的项目, 例如当年开启的苏州工业园也已迈入25周年。 他指出,中国正迈向区域集群发展,而新中两国目前的七项区域经贸合作理事会,和政府间合作项目虽起源于旧框架,但是对于契合中国新阶段的发展提供扎实基础。 张志贤提及的其中一项新中合作项目天津生态城,被视为新中合作的指标性项目。2007年,时任国务资政吴作栋和时任中国总理温家宝构思生态城,选定天津滨海新区为生态城所在地。 天津生态城是两国开展的第二个政府间合作项目,也是新中双边合作联合委员会(JCBC)推动的项目之一。张志贤是JCBC新方联合主席。 两国的目标是将生态城建设成人与人、人与自然、人与经济和谐,可持续发展并可复制的城市。 时任国家发展部暨贸工部长李奕贤,在2012年的第八届绿化建筑峰会上,曾放眼该生态城在2020年完全完成,规划人口35万。 他形容,新加坡乐意透过合作分享及学习绿化科技,新中天津生态城则是两国合作的典范。 天津生态城占地30平方公里,在去年迎来10周年纪念。当时《联合早报》一篇报导揭露,有10万人在生态城生活和工作,建成并售出三万套住宅。 然而,距离明年要达到35万人口目标,显然仍有巨大差距。 据了解,目前累计入驻生态城的企业达7700余家,其中智能科技企业占三分之一。…

Singapore exile, Tan Wah Piow writes to AGC asking for convictions in 1975 quashed

Singapore exile, Tan Wah Piow has sent a letter to the Attorney-General…

S’pore imposes ‘stricter measures’ for safe distancing amid COVID-19 outbreak, heading closer to the Red DORSCON level measures

After several local COVID-19 cases reportedly had no links to previous cases…