Singapore Airlines A-380 taking off at Terminal A of Zurich Airport on September 8, 2018 in Zurich, Switzerland. (Image by Fedor Selivanov / Shutterstock.com)

A passenger on Singapore Airlines (SIA) flying from Singapore to Delhi took to Facebook on Sunday (1 December) to slam the airline for its “pathetic preparedness and service” after the flight was delayed for 16 hours.
Facebook user Deep Roy wrote a lengthy post on SIA’s Facebook page describing the “inhuman torture” he experienced on 29 November when the SIA flight that was due to depart from Singapore at 4.25 pm was delayed.

First, the flight was delayed for a couple of hours due to rain. Passengers had already boarded the plane at this time and were inside the cabin for more than an hour, said Mr Roy, adding that it had become “terribly hot without AC”.
Just as the plane was about to take off, the passengers were told that there was a problem with the braking mechanism. The plane headed back to the terminal where the passengers disembarked.
Mr Roy said the estimated time of departure was moved first to 8.50pm and then 11.30pm when the engineers discovered that they needed to replace a faulty brake pump.
As the passengers were waiting in the airport, they were offered some credit for food.
Mr Roy said, “We were just offered a measly SGD 15 credit for getting some dinner as the SQ staff refused to take out the meals from the aircraft that we were supposed to have been given had we been airborne.”
Later at 11.00pm, passengers boarded the plane for a second time after being informed that the test run was successful. Unfortunately, just before take-off again, there was another problem with the braking mechanism. Passengers were again asked to disembark and return to the terminal. This was around 1 am the next morning.
Mr Roy explained, “When we insisted that we did not want to get into the same plane again as it was clearly unsafe, they told us they did not have any other A380 planes available, even though we were in Singapore which was their Hub and they are the National Carrier!”
He continued, “They also refused to provide any hotel accommodation claiming all hotels were full (which was established to be a blatant lie). Their Ground Staff Executives kept feeding us one lie after another and did not show any concern for the problems we were facing!”
The irate passenger then said that the airline eventually arranged for some sandwiches, tea and coffee after “continuous yelling and protests”.
They were also later informed that they would be put on a different A380 that was flying in from Melbourne that morning.
“We finally boarded the new plane (our THIRD BOARDING) which eventually took off around 9:00 am SGP Time and reached New Delhi around 12:00 pm India Time after more than 16 HOURS DELAY! “
Mr Roy added, “Thankfully this time we did not have any braking problems!! At this time, we were all just relieved to finally get back home after this relentless & inhuman torture!”
He lamented that the delay caused him to miss his child’s award ceremony.
He said, “Despite charging much higher fares, Singapore Airlines demonstrated pathetic preparedness and service! This ordeal made one thing very clear to me & all my co-passengers – #NeverEverFlySingaporeAirlines!!”
Mr Roy ended his post with a demand for a full refund and an unconditional apology from SIA.
Other passengers on the same flight chimed in as well, adding that the SIA team was “unprofessional” and described the ordeal as “torture”.



However, other netizens commenting on Mr Roy’s post, mostly Singaporeans, jumped in to support the Airline and ask him to “stop complaining” and be thankful that he arrived safely despite the delays.
Many pointed out that they would rather be safe than sorry and praise SIA for putting safety first:







One person noted that delays are inevitable, no matter the airline She also acknowledged that a 16-hour delay is mentally draining but added that SIA managed to get passengers to arrive at their destination safely, which is the most important thing.

One person shared their own experience of a delayed flight with SIA, saying that the problem was in “poor communication” and the ground staff’s handling of the situation.

One person called for compassion, asking other commenters to put themselves in Mr Roy’s shoes and think about moments when they were upset and took to Facebook to rant about unhappy experiences.

SIA has won the title of World’s Best Airline in the Skytrax World Airline Awards four times including in 2018 and has been consistently ranked in the top 3 for the past 12 years. However, it was knocked off the top in 2019 by Qatar Airways which reclaimed the top spot.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

罗厘撞毙三路人案:司机承认无照驾驶 判罚款1400元吊牌一年

去年4月23日,在宏茂桥6道往玛丽蒙路(Marymount Road)的路段发生致命意外,肇事罗厘失控冲上路堤后撞死3名路人,再撞上一辆正要从杨厝港巴士转换站转进大路的新捷运巴士。 昨日(14日),27岁罗厘司机在庭上承认无照驾驶,被判罚款1400元。死者家属不排除日后将追究民事责任。 司机在意外发生后,被控三项罪行,其中一项危险驾驶导致他人死亡罪日前获判无事省释。在14日肇事司机亦承认另外两项罪名,包括一项无照驾驶以及一项无汽车保险驾驶的罪名,获判罚款1400元,并且吊销驾驶执照一年。 无事省释不等于无罪,控方一旦掌握充分证据,可重新提控。 据目击者表示,罗厘当时沿着宏茂桥6道往宏茂桥中心行驶,来到三岔路口后突然失控,撞倒栏杆、交通灯,最后冲向3名路人撞倒后才停下。三人遭撞后,当场毙命。 三名死者分别是蔡庆忠(86岁)和蔡爱华(58岁)父女,以及他们的朋友叶顺发(63岁)。 据庭上揭露,被告父亲是建筑公司的安全主管,而被告在前年8月考获3A驾照后,将自己无法开罗厘的事实隐瞒,并在去年1月开始驾驶父亲的罗厘。 该案审讯一年以来,被告几乎以心脏问题必须接受治疗,而转由父亲代替出庭。被告律师表示被告患有严重的心脏疾病,但并未透露太多详情。而昨日则是死者家属首度见到被告,死者家属泪诉,见到被告,想起亲人,至今仍未能放下。 死者家属回忆当天意外,姐姐因为要陪父亲做身体检查而特地请假,而因为父亲走路不太方便,才会找来轮椅,而朋友叶顺发相信也是为了帮忙,才会三人同行,岂料意外发生导致天人永隔。 在致命车祸后半年,蔡庆忠遗孀、蔡爱华母亲林美因(79岁)则因悲痛过度,肾衰竭过世。据二女儿表示,自意外发生后,母亲便郁郁寡欢、寝食不安,一直走不出悲痛,加上曾摔伤盆骨,其肾脏因免疫系统持续下降而开始衰竭,最终离世。女儿亿述,母亲生前最大的心愿就是让肇祸司机受审,受到制裁,可惜却抱憾离开。

【冠状病毒19】中国北京添32确诊 累计106例

北京疫情持续爆发,据中国国家卫健委最新消息公布,中国再新增40起确诊病例,其中北京32起,累计确诊病例达106例。 据中国媒体报导,该市确诊患者目前正在首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院接受治疗,院方也表示,医院已进入备战状态,目前已启用六个应急病区接诊。医院主管医疗护理副院长吴国安指出,在今年疫情爆发后,医院临时扩建了八个病区,共300个床位。 在新一轮疫情爆发前已启用两个,如今疫情死灰复燃,医院也紧急腾出应急病区,启用了四个病区收治确诊病例。 吴国安也表示,目前确诊病例多为普通病症,少数轻症和无症状者,另有一名危重患者入院时需转入深切治疗部使用呼吸机,至周一(15日)须用上叶克膜。 中国疾病预防控制中心流行病学首席专家吴尊友15日晚间在接受央视专访时表示,目前北京的病例特征还没有观察到明显的家庭聚集性传播,也没有观察到就诊交叉传播。 对此,他认为北京目前的疫情均属局部事件,无需针对全北京市响应级别进行调整,但未来三天的北京报告病例数将会决定疫情的走向。若未来发病的报告数不大,代表这次疫情就基本稳定在这样一个规模。 中国首都北京连续四天出现多起确诊病例,据陆媒报道,此次疫情可能与北京新发地农产批发市场相关。该市场从切割进口三文鱼的案板中发现冠状病毒,目前已有多家超市将三文鱼下架。

【冠状病毒19】8月25日 31例新增例确诊 一例入境病例

根据卫生部文告,截至本月25日中午12时,本地新增31例冠病19确诊,一例入境病例,没有社区病例。 本地累计确诊已增至5万6435例。 入境病例在入境我国后履行居家通知,其余病例是正在隔离的客工。 当局仍在收集病例详情,并将在晚间公布。

致函拒沈佳泉提取公积金 公积金局:健康评估未通过

日前, 本社报道56岁公民沈佳泉因心脏衰竭想透过申请公积金减轻负担而被拒,如今公积金局正式发函,拒绝他以医疗为由提取公积金的申请。 本月15日,本社报导沈佳泉因心脏衰竭身体出现状况,接受了手术后,左心室射出率(LVEF)竟只剩下37巴仙的功能,要知道正常人的左心室射出率(LVEF)在55至70巴仙。此外,医生也叮嘱他不能提重物,否则心脏会痛。 尽管经过手术后,沈佳泉也试着过上正常人的生活,尝试开私召车以及其他兼职工作,但因心脏问题,身体无法负荷。2017年,他以全面停工,家里仅靠妻子约1800元的收入过活,加上庞大的医疗费,家庭经济状况拮据。 然而,社会服务办公室认为家里妻子仍有稳定收入,故将拒绝他的申请。 根据公积金局官网指出,公民只有在四种情况下,能透过医疗理由申请提取公积金,即申请者因为丧失身体或心智能力、或寿命严重受损、或永久性缺乏能力、获得了绝症,而无法工作。 另一方面,公积金表示沈佳泉的医师两次鉴定声明证明与当局所邀请的医师,均证实沈佳泉目前的身体确实不适合就业,但仍然可以从事简单不累的工作。 为了能够说服公积金局让他能提取公积金,沈佳泉也去拜访了西海岸集选区议员郑德源寻求协助,郑德源随后也致函公积金委员会调查此案。 尽管郑德源提出上诉,以及沈佳泉不断提出申请,公积金局依然保持不变,拒绝沈佳泉领取公积金。 公积金局信中表示,成员在经医生(无论是政府医院、综合诊所或专科医生)鉴定,无法从事任何工作、寿命严重受损或身患绝症,均可依据MGS计划提取部分公积金储蓄。 然而,由于沈佳泉在经过国家心脏中心医师评估后,证明尽管他不适合就业,但仍然能从事不需耗费体力的工作。 当局邀请了两位医生评估沈佳泉的情况,也得出上述医生的结论,故此不符合以医疗理由领出公积金的条件。…