Josephine Teo (Photo: Bloomberg)

The Manpower Ministry (MOM) released an Advanced Labour Force report for 2019 yesterday (28 Nov). It said that overall the resident unemployment rate remained low in June 2019.
“The PMET unemployment rate (non-seasonally adjusted) held steady at 2.9% in June 2019 while their long-term unemployment rate decreased from 0.8% in June 2018 to 0.6% in June 2019,” it wrote.
“On the other hand, cyclical effects such as the US-China trade conflict that affected manufacturing output and retail trade caused the unemployment rate for non-PMETs to increase from 4.0% a year ago to 4.7% in June 2019. However, the increase in their long-term unemployment rate was slight, from 0.7% to 0.8%.”
MOM, however, did not breakdown the unemployment rate for PRs and Singaporeans separately. The government usually lumps PR and Singaporean statistics together under the ‘resident’ category in its reports.
In an interview with the media on Wednesday (27 Nov), Manpower Minister Josephine Teo described the current economic situation as “persistent showers but with pockets of sunshine”.
However, she said that comparing with other crisis years, the present economic situation is much better. During the 2009 global financial crisis, she said that Singapore’s job market was hit much harder.
“At the time, a regular year’s retrenchment for Singapore was around 15,000, and analysts were projecting 2009 job losses to hit 100,000. So (it was a) really sudden downpour, a thunderstorm. You don’t see that today,” she said.
Similarly, the economic crisis caused by the 2003 Sars outbreak, the downturn after the 9/11 attacks and the bursting of the dotcom bubble in 2001, and the Asian Financial Crisis of 1998 were “very, very frightening years” for Singapore, she added.
“But actually if you compare today to those years, I think it’s not the same,” she said. “There are difficulties but there are also opportunities at this time.”
When asked about the disconnect between Government statistics showing employment growth and ground sentiment that jobs are not readily available, she said that the Government needs to find more ways to show job seekers where the available jobs are.
She added, “And I think we also keep in mind that at any one time our unemployment is maybe about 3 per cent. Now even with a resident workforce of 2.3 million, 3 per cent is still about 60,000 people. So, for 60,000 people to tell you that they haven’t seen the jobs, it’s not so surprising itself. But weigh that against the 97 per cent who are in jobs, you also can reflect their views.”
“There are many companies that will tell you that they are still very short of people,” she said.
She also encouraged job seekers to make use of Government schemes like the Professional Conversion Programme (PCP) and Place and Train Programme to help them.
Number of foreign PMETs continues to increase in Singapore
Meanwhile, the Singapore government continues to allow more foreign PMETs to enter into Singapore to work, according to data on MOM website:

The total number of foreign EP and S-Pass holders was 381,300 by end of 2018. In fact, 6 months later by end June 2019, that number had increased to 386,800.
The national Jobs Bank which is supposed to force companies to “fairly” consider Singaporean PMETs first before they are permitted to hire foreign ones is constantly being abused by companies.
Companies are supposed to put up their job advertisements on Jobs Bank for 14 days so as to give Singaporeans a chance to apply before the companies can apply for an EP to recruit foreign PMETs:

However, many companies have in fact already had a foreign recruit in mind before putting up their job advertisement on Jobs Bank, merely to “show compliance”, so that they can go ahead to apply EP for the foreign job applicant. When MOM inquires, the company could easily say no Singaporeans were able to qualify.
Here is an example taken from an expat forum showing how Jobs Bank was abused by a company. In this case, the company had already offered a job to a foreign PMET but forgot to put up the job advertisement on Jobs Bank:




 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

父母家长亦申诉电动滑板车禁令造成不便

早前,交通部宣布政府和三大送餐公司协商,政府和三家主要送餐公司将联手,提供700万元的津贴,协助送餐员把电动滑板车折旧,改用脚踏车等其他代步工具。 不过,在一些社交媒体,也有父母家长反映,他们也使用个人代步工具载送孩子上学放学,然而禁令也让他们面对许多不便,也无法达到“活跃通勤”的效果。 电动滑板车禁令自11月4日公布后,使依靠该代步工具送外卖的送餐员生计大受影响因。周二(12日)晚上,约300名送餐员出席在安谷民众俱乐部(Anchorvale Community Club)举行的对话会,也向盛港西单选区议员蓝彬明医生申诉他们的问题。 蓝彬明随后也在其脸书上,重点讲解他与送餐员们的商议,坦言没有完美的解决方案;禁止电动滑板车在行人道上行驶,是为了保护大多数行人的安全。 蓝彬明也指出,GrabFood为其送餐伙伴提供了转换交通工具的补助金;若送餐员有难处也可向他们的国会议员反映。 斥资700万元协助送餐员 据出席者向《今日报》反映,蓝彬明向他们详细讲解了总额700万元的以旧换新援助计划,以帮助送餐员们在无需额外付费下,将电动滑板车转换为电动脚车。 此计划是政府和新加坡三大送餐公司的协议合作,为三大送餐公司的送餐骑士们提供高达1000元现款,让他们将现有的电板车换成电动脚车或普通脚车。 蓝彬明也在其脸书帖文下总结说,“随着我们的改进,也希望行人能够为负责人的骑士们着想,尽可能地使用行人道,让骑士们能够执行责任之余,也照顾到行人安全” 。…

张媛容:最后遗嘱似乎李显龙比李显扬受益较多

在野政治人物张媛容律师: 我取得了纪律审裁庭的报告,现在仍在阅读中。 有好多事项令我困惑。例如,审裁庭指林学芬“误导”已故李光耀,让后者以为最后一份遗嘱等同最初遗嘱,但实则两者有不同。 然而,最后遗嘱和第一份遗嘱的区别,仅在两方面: 首先,最初版本有“赠予”条款(Gift-Over Clause),说明若三名子女中有人比他早逝情况下的条文;但最终版本没有。事实上,所有最终版本前遗嘱都有“赠予条款”(第三版本有不同条文),吊诡的是最终版本却删除之。 其二,第一版本有附加条款允许李玮玲可以免租金继续住在欧思礼路38号,李显龙则需承担该故居的维修保养费用。最终版本同样允许李玮玲住在该处,但没有注明“免租金”和李显龙“在李玮玲居住期间承担维修保养费用”等字眼。 我从审裁庭报告的资讯得出,除了上述两处不同,基本上最后遗嘱和最初版本是相同的。 审裁庭报告未说明“赠予条款”的内容。一般上,赠与条款可规定,若任何受益人比立遗嘱者提前逝世,那么相关份额将由有关受益人的子女继承;若无子嗣,则份额将分配给其他尚在世的受益人。 假定“赠予条款”的性质如上述,实则有三个子女的李显扬,能从中受益,因此在最终版本排除掉“赠予条款”,并不符合李显扬的利益。 至于最终版本没有“免租金”和“承担欧思礼38故居保养费用”等字眼,实则对李显龙有利,至于李玮玲的受益则减少。 我看不出上述两种差异,能显示林学芬有任何不良意图。指林学芬故意修改第一版本作出上述两处更动,是荒谬的。若是我会排除掉这种可能。…

吉宝岸外与海事退出岸外钻油业务 专注基设与再生能源项目

在完成现有钻井建设后,吉宝岸外与海事(Keppel Offshore & Marine)将退出岸外钻油业务,履行吉宝对于可持续性及抗全球暖化的承诺。 同时,逐渐从其他低价值维修与对盈利做出低贡献的业务撤走,并且将削减岸外与海事业务的人力。 吉宝企业是在昨日(28日)发声明,声称在全球能源过渡、石油工业面对主要颠覆,上述决定乃是对岸外与海事业务进行策略检讨后做出的,目的是朝轻资产与轻人力转型,变得更灵活与更具竞争力。 吉宝总裁卢振华认为,受到环境考量以及成本降低驱使,使得可再生能源在全球能源市场的份额迅速增长。预计天然气将作为过渡燃料,在未来几年内将取代石油成为世界上最大的能源。 “抓住瞬息万变的机遇,我们正采取果断决策,对吉宝岸外与海事转型,确保它保持相关性和竞争力,并完全符合吉宝2030年愿景。” 集团也探讨其他“非有机”投资选项,但不保证最终会达成任何交易。 另一方面,吉宝检讨旗下物流业务,决定把东南亚与澳洲物流与通路管理业务,脱售给能够提供更好生态系统、扩大业务规模的第三方。

新加坡政府投资公司:亚洲具高经济增长潜力与吸引力投资机会

据《亚洲新闻台》报导,新加坡政府投资公司(GIC)基于高经济增长潜力与具吸引力的投资机会,对于亚洲发展采建设性观点。 今日(3日)这个我国的主权基金之一,在释出年度报告中提到,“亚洲表现出极具吸引的条件,在基本消费商品与服务业有良好的前景,如金融业、医疗业、教育以及科技发展”。 “其全球价值主张(global value proposition)会逐渐增长,主要原因来自中产阶级、基础建设投资和地区一体化不断增多,并以稳定的科技发展为基础使其价值主张有增长的趋势。 尽管如此,亚洲仍面临如不平等的结构性改革与持续不断的中美贸易战变数。对此,GIC则称这些问题都会得以解决。 GIC行政总裁林昭杰(Lim Chow Kiat)表示,只要亚洲持续维持强劲增长,GIC将会投资在更多不同的领域,增加给更多商品投资机会。 “如果亚洲持续强劲地增长,如过去的30-40年,我想这对亚洲商品的曝光度有非常大的帮助。” 近年来,GIC在亚洲的投资组合中占20巴仙(不包括日本),而在日本的投资组合则占12巴仙,其余的投资组合则分散在不同市场如美国(32巴仙)、英国(6巴仙)、欧元区(12巴仙)、拉丁美洲(3巴仙)。另外,中东、非洲和其他欧洲国家则占七巴仙,以及其余地方共占八巴仙。 林昭杰在GIC在发表2018/19财年投资报告上指出,根据年度报告卡,GIC的对数收益率在上一季的财政年度中呈现稳定的收益率。但他也再次重申,仍需保持警惕,因为目前全球正笼罩在中美贸易战的阴影下。…