The city bus arrives at the station in Bugis, Singapore city. Public transport in the city Singapore from Shutterstock.com

According to a study done by the National University of Singapore (NUS) on how Singaporeans use public transport, it found that seniors, students and children tend to prioritise the cost of fares whereas working adults focus more on the reliability of travel time.
The study, titled “Travel Time Uncertainties and Commuter Behaviour: Evidence from Smart Data in Singapore”, was published in January and looked through a large number of public transport data.
It checked all ez-link card holders in Singapore in the entire month of August 2013 – that’s a total of 3.9 million cards, involving 175 million trips. In addition, it also vetted an individual’s trip time (from tap in until tap out), their general identity (child, senior, student or adult), as well as transport mode (bus or train).
The study found that working individuals prefer to take MRT because they deem it more reliable in terms of travel time, as opposed to buses. This is because buses are often affected by other external issues like weather or traffic conditions – even if buses are faster, on average, on a particular route.
Additionally, it also found that working adults tend to switch travel modes more as compared to other users.
Based on the findings, the authors of the study stated that these findings have “useful implications” for policy makers, precisely on the creation of dedicated bus lanes that make bus services more reliable.
If that’s not all, they also questioned the value of “early bird” discount fares for working adults in the study, since this group are not motivated by saving money.

Buses are less reliable and slower

Out of all the 3.9 million cards examined, the study found that only one in 10 trips by working adults (10.6%) were by bus, while almost three in 10 trips by senior citizens (29.4%) were by bus.
The study also revealed that bus travel tends to be slower and less reliable. On average, across all journeys, bus trips for the same route that also has rails were about nine minutes slower than rails.
However, the biggest advantage of travelling via bus is that the fare is cheaper – in fact  S$0.16 lower than rail charges, the study noted.
“(Adults will) take a train because (they) don’t care if it’s expensive or cheap,” said Professor Sumit Agarwal of the NUS Business School, who led the study.
Speaking to TODAY, he added, “(They) care about reliability of reaching where (they) have to reach on time…especially when there are work related issues.”
Prof Agarwal explained that children, who has lesser money than adults, and seniors, who may have retired and relying on Central Provident Fund funds, are less conscious time. They prefer to save money on transport wherever they can, he said.
Pointing out about kids and elderly citizens, he said they “really don’t care about time..they don’t have these firm commitments where (they) need to meet somebody at this time or otherwise lose (their) business”.

Working adults focus more on certainty

On the other hand, he highlighted that adults prefer to opt for consistent, reliable travel modes as opposed to those who may be faster, but less reliable.
“For instance, there could be a (destination) where it takes a shorter time to go by bus than by train. But if the reliability of that bus to reach there on time is not there, you’ll still take the train..It’s not just the time, it’s the accuracy of that time,” Prof Agarwal noted.
He continued that working adults have this expectation that public transport should bring them to their destination on time.
“In Singapore, when people say I’ll meet you at eight, that really means at eight..(for example, they know that) it will take 17 minutes (on public transport), and three minutes (to walk) and (they’ll) meet that person precisely at that time,” he stated.

Efforts to shape policy

Based on the findings, the study concluded that efforts to promote reliability of bus travel could encourage working adults to take bus instead of trains. This then reduces “overloaded” trains during peak hours.
One of the efforts highlighted in the study was the Land Transport Authority (LTA’s) Bus Services Enhancement Programme (BSEP), which was rolled out in 2012 and completed in 2017.
A total of 1,000 buses were added to the existing fleet, and raised the capacity of 218 services. Additionally, LTA also increased the bus lanes in conjunction with BSEP.
Since 2007, LTA has also introduced Real-Time Bus Arrival Information System and the information was displayed on panels fitted at some bus stops. These efforts helped to further reduce the uncertainty of bus travel time, the report asserted.
The report also mentioned that LTA has expanded the capacity for rail travel, and has plans to “double the rail transit track length by year 2030”.
It also suggested that rail operators could opt to create “peak-hour express rail services” to further bring down travel time and increase reliability as the trains only stop at major subway stations.
Separately, the study also questioned the effectiveness of certain policies like “early bird” MRT fares, which was introduced to persuade people to use the train earlier than the peak time.
It stated that the Free Pre-Peak Travel scheme, which gave commuters free rides if they are at any of the 18 MRT stations in the city area before 7.45am, was “limited” in its effectiveness. This is because working adults were not bothered much about the cost of travel, said the study. The scheme ran from 2013 to 2017.
Prof Agarwal explained that adults pay more attention to productivity at the workplace as compared to the cost of travelling. “If they know other people are also going to be early and then they can organise meetings and be more effective then it’s okay. (But) if I just go early and nobody else shows up, then what’s the point?”
Separately, in response to these findings, LTA told TODAY that the scheme’s results were tallies with their aims, which were to “better distribute travel demand on the rail network and optimise overall rail capacity in the mornings”.
It appears that the scheme caused a 7% shift in rail trips during the morning peak hours, LTA said.
“(LTA) will continue to monitor the effectiveness of the scheme, taking into account rail network enhancements and commuter’s travel patterns, and make adjustments if necessary.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Letters from Vui Kong – The Twelfth Letter : On Facing Death

Yong Vui Kong is a death row inmate in Singapore. He was…

Netizens slam PAP’s Shamsul Kamar & pro-PAP FB page for “shameful” disinformation post about woman in PA standee fiasco

One of the most recent public figures to chime in on the…

惊!马国妇女隔离期间竟外出用餐,还被确诊!

戴着隔离手环,竟然还外出用餐,马来西亚一名妇女最终还被检测出出呈阳性结果。 日前,邻国马来西亚一名妇女从外国回马后,在戴着隔离手环的情况下仍外出用餐,被网友拍摄下来并上传到网络上,引起议论纷纷。 据马媒报导指出,网络上流传戴着隔离手环的妇女,外出用餐时的照片是拍摄于本月6日,而妇女则是在本月4日返马。 报导表示,当妇女抵达吉隆坡国际机场时,就有被要求进行隔离14天,但当时初步检测是呈阴性的结果,不过为了安全起见,还是要求她戴上隔离手环。而她被发现在6日,在怡保的餐厅内享用早餐,但照片却是近日才流传出去。 妇女与其儿子则是在隔离第13天内,第二次检测时确认感染冠病,17日被送入院。 不少网民对于妇女的行为感到不满,痛批妇女罔顾隔离条规,并对其或对民众带来危害的自私举止感到愤怒,引发大量网民挞伐。 而北马首相署公共卫生特别顾问嘉米拉也在其推特上传此照片,并斥责该名妇女太无耻,明目张胆外出用餐很可能会引发第二波新冠病毒疫情。 在网友的热议下,霹州卫生局也采取相关行动,于在昨日(20日)鉴定该妇女身份。 It’s people like her…

RSN to buy 4 new “BMW” submarines costing $3.2 billion while water and electricity tariffs up 20%

It was reported in the mainstream media yesterday that the Singapore Navy…