On Monday (18 November), the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) Secretary-General Chee Soon Juan took to his Facebook to voice his disagreement with a statement uttered by Bukit Batok MP Murali Pillai in 2016.
Dr Chee recalls the 2016 by-election which he contested in, where he said that Members of Parliament (MPs) “should serve their constituents on a full-time basis and give them undivided attention”, which Mr Murali disagreed with.
“Mr Murali countered that there was no need for this because it would mean MPs having to ‘give up their day jobs’. This unfortunate description gives us an insight into his thinking – than an MP’s role is only a part-time gig,” Dr Chee wrote.
He continued, “Back then, few saw the importance of the issue. After all, according to Mr Murali, PAP MPs ‘have not faced any problems going about their duties’. MPs may have gotten away with it all this time but when a situation as horrendous as the fire that nearly consumed the live of its victims happens, things get very real very quickly.
And all because the fire safety equipment whose crucial maintenance was the responsibility of the MP and his town council was rendered useless during the fire.”
Dr Chee explained in the case of Mr Murali who is a partner at Rajah & Tann LLP law firm, it’s difficult for him, or anyone as the matter of fact, to “extend their full attention and tend to the people’s business” after working for 10 hours at a psychologically and emotionally taxing job.
“You cannot serve two masters at the same time,” Dr Chee noted.
Although the SDP’s chief asserted that he did not mean that Mr Murali has to check the fire hose reel himself, but “there is a difference between spending 50 hours a week versus in the estate when it comes to tending to its affairs.”
As such, he suggested that Mr Pillai spends his day at the Town Council first before heading to the law firm in the evening.
“Why doesn’t Mr Murali spend his weekdays at the Town Council? After he’s done, he can go to his practice in the evening to take care of his cases. If he recoils such an arrangement, why should residents accept the alternative and less desirable one?” Dr Chee noted.
This is because Dr Chee stated that Singaporeans, who are regarded as MPs’ employer did not pay them a full-time salary of S$16,000 a month, just to have them “work for a couple of hours during the weekends and once a week during weekdays”.
“Not only do MPs work part-time, they use residents’ money to outsource to managing agents the work they are supposed to do. Managing agents are private, profit-making agencies. They add another layer of expenses for residents,” Dr Chee said.
He added, “This is why PAP-run town councils keep on raising S&CC, the last round of increase (by as much as $17/month/unit) came in the last couple of years.”
Therefore, he noted that this results to residents being in the losing end – “they don’t get the full attention of their MPs and have to pay extra for their estates to be run”.

SDP lays out its plans

Based on this situation, Dr Chee explained that if SDP is elected, the members of the party will dedicate themselves to full-time work.
“In BB (Bukit Batok), I will personally recruit the town council staff and oversee its daily operations. There will be no managing agents,” he pointed out.
He went on further to note that he will also always be in the town council office on a daily basis, except when he has to be in Parliament.
“I will be available whenever my staff and the residents need me to not only resolve problems but to anticipate events and plan for them. Also, meet-the-people’s sessions need not be confined to a couple of hours in the evenings once a week,” he said.
“In addition, I will conduct regular town hall meetings with residents to make transparent town council work, plan with them the running of their estates and discuss PAP policies. On top of this, I will be in parliament tabling motions, proposing bills and making sure no one yawns.”
With everything mentioned above, Dr Chee highlighted that he don’t see “how an MP’s job can be a part-time one”.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

川金峰会期间5韩请愿者被捕 新国严法对外籍一视同仁

五名南韩妇女在本月11日晚,前往金正恩下榻的瑞吉酒店附近请愿,被新加坡警方以制造混乱,和多番不听取警方警告,援引《公共秩序法》逮捕。 新加坡警方声明,这批请愿者是在东陵路和那森路交接处,于晚上9时10分被捕。她们的请愿地点正好靠近朝鲜领导人金正恩一行下榻的瑞吉酒店。 据《海峡时报》报导,警方曾劝阻和警告他们,不能在以上管制地区示威请愿,惟后者不愿给予合作,开始吵嚷大声喊叫。鉴于对方持续引发骚动且屡劝不听,警方才实施逮捕。 《2009年公共秩序法案》规定,户外公众游行与集会必需在活动前的至少14天,通知警方跟获得警察许可,否则视为非法。只有室内集会可在无需警方许可下,能自由进行。 仿效伦敦海德公园,新加坡演说者角落是本国唯一不需警方许可,可自由使用、供民众集会的地方。但是,任何人在演说者角落举行活动/请愿之前,还得在国家公园局通过在线方式注册自己的个人信息,该地区周边也有许多闭路监控设备,形同变相的监视。 再者,即使只有一人举着牌子请愿或为任何政治原因(比如,抗议公积金)而静坐,该法也视为非法集会。至于至少5000人参加的公开活动,和上万人参加的私人活动,主办单位必须在活动前的至少28天,通知警方。 近期发生的5名韩籍请愿者被捕事件,显示新国《公共秩序法》对待本国与外籍人士都一视同仁。若外籍人士前来声援或参与本国的人权或社会议题请愿,都有可能被对付。 新、台、马集会比较 在马来西亚举办集会,也需向警察申请准证,警方有权不批准任何地点、时间主题不适合的集会,或会要求主办方更改地点。 马来西亚经历4次干净选举联盟集会以及其他大大小小和平请愿运动,集会者态度已日趋成熟,惟每次的集会都需与警方斡旋、角力。 为了确保集会者安全,也不得随意越过警方防线以及遵守已订立的解散时间,大部分集会者都懂得表现克制,尽量避免留学冲突。 前朝政府在推出《2012年和平集会法令》,企图进一步管制民间发起的集会权利,不过马国上诉庭在2014年一项标志性裁决,捍卫马国人民的集会权利。…

SIA CEO makes $4.2m despite SIA incurring first full-year loss of $212m in 48-year history

According to the latest SIA annual report just released, SIA CEO Goh…

PM Lee interviewed on BBC HARDTALK, declines to comment on restriction of press freedom in Singapore

BBC HARDtalk featured a trailer of an interview with Singapore Prime Minister, Lee…

Paralympic medallists should be rewarded the same as Olympic counterparts: AWARE and Disabled People’s Association SG

Singapore’s Paralympians should be awarded the same recognition and rewards for their…