Earlier today (18 Nov), Singapore Post (SingPost) officially launched its MyPostman campaign islandwide, encouraging households and businesses across Singapore to get to know the postman serving them, while providing a platform for direct feedback and ratings on postal services.
The nation roll-out comes after a successful trial held between 16 July and 16 September 2019 in Yishun and Bukit Timah.
According to SingPost, the trial, which covered over 130,000 households served by 80 postmen, saw an overwhelming support by residents. Over the two-month period, about 1,000 ratings were achieved, with an average score of 4.5 stars out of a maximum of 5, given to the postmen.

Image from SingPost
As part of the campaign, close to 2 million sets of fridge magnets will be distributed to every residential household and business unit across Singapore in phases from now until the end of the year. The set of colourful fridge magnets will contain information on the MyPostman.sg website, as well as a QR code that users can scan using their mobile devices to access the website.
Since the start of this month, households have been receiving their fridge magnets, as the campaign rolls out to more districts across Singapore progressively. Residents can access the website and key in their postal code to find out the postman serving their area. Additionally, residents can also provide feedback, words of encouragement, or rate the service they have received.
To be launched in phases from now until the end of the year, the detailed roll-out dates are as follow:
Image from SingPost
MyPostman was conceived earlier this year to establish a better bond between residents and their postman, as well as to build a better understanding of Singapore’s postal workforce and to elevate SingPost’s level of service. The concept behind the campaign lends its roots from Singapore’s kampung days, where residents were deeply acquainted with their postmen – whom they typically interact on a daily basis whenever mail was delivered.
“The campaign was designed to build stronger bonds between the community and their postmen, and the trial has shown us so,” said Mr Robin Goh, Group Chief Brand & Communications Officer at SingPost.
“The positive feedback from the residents have also helped in boosting the morale of our workforce and bolster the pride they take in being part of the Singapore postal workforce,” he added.
SingPost encountered heavy criticism for its poor service standards early this year
Despite the fact that SingPost is seemingly ending the year on a good note with this newly introduced campaign that managed to garner a positive response by Singaporeans during its trial phase, let us not forget how 2019 started off for SingPost.
As the year kicked-off, SingPost had been receiving plenty of attention from the public, but for all the wrong reasons.
On 10 January, a massage parlour owner said SingPost had failed to fulfil their end of a commercial agreement when they failed to deliver on the promised service of printing and distributing 65,000 flyers to homes and businesses around the island. The business owner had apparently paid $7,000 for SingPost’s printing and distributing service.
Not only did SingPost fail to do the job, the owner of the massage parlour, Mr Johnson Tan, said that SingPost had even tried to fool him into thinking that the services had indeed been carried out when in fact it was not.
If that is not bad enough, the company had also been receiving myriad of complaints from Singaporeans after their postmen left delivery-failure notice in their doorsteps even though someone was at home to receive the parcel.
In response, SingPost took to their Facebook page on 14 January to apologise for the inconvenience that they had caused to the public, adding that they will look into the matter and further improve their services.
While SingPost can be commended for having an apologetic character, it didn’t help that their services took a turn for the worse after that.
On 28 January, Facebook user Alyce Kathlyn took to Facebook to post eight photos, showing unopened letters and packages discarded in a public dustbin at Ang Mo Kio. She claimed that the postman had discarded the letters and parcels in the bin.
Following SingPost’s investigation into the matter, a postman serving areas in Ang Mo Kio was arrested on 29 January. SingPost also apologised “unreservedly” to the residents who were victims of the incident.
Subsequently, the Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA) announced on 7 February that it will impose a financial penalty of S$100,000 on SingPost for its failure to meet the postal Quality of Service (QoS) standards for delivery of local basic letters and registered mail on nine events in 2017.
Moreover, on 29 March, the IMDA once again imposed a financial penalty of $300,000 on SingPost; this time, however, for not meeting the postal QoS standards for delivery of local basic letters, registered basic letters, and international basic letters in 2018.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Grassroots organizations give vouchers, groceries and cash to people without “documentary evidence”

The Auditor-General Office (AGO) released its auditing report on government ministries and…

“游乐场严禁游玩奔跑”? 荒谬告示牌成网上笑柄

想象一下,若你走入一间餐厅却见告示牌上写着“严禁在餐厅内饮酒吃饭”、或在泳池内挂着“严禁游泳”的告示牌,甚至是在赌场中挂着“严禁赌博”的告示牌,是否会觉得嘀笑皆非。虽然这些滑稽讽刺的迹象让任何目睹它的人都无法相信,但在几年前,就真有这样的情况出现。 脸书群组All Singapore Stuff前天(7月23日)上载了一张竖立在一个游乐场的告示牌,上面写着“严禁在游乐场内跑步或游戏”。 不过经本社查证,有关游乐场“禁止游玩令”的告示牌,曾在2013年6月报导过。该告示牌当时竖立盛港东路第323B栋组屋的一个游乐场上,写着不允许儿童在该组屋游乐场上跑步或游戏,引来居民嘲笑。 有居民投诉使用者发出太大噪音 据报导,该游乐场位于盛港西国会议员蓝彬明医生选区内,当时他也是宏茂桥市镇会主席。 当时他告诉《海啸时报》,过去因为有居民投诉游乐场发出太大噪音,所以立个告示牌,善意提醒游乐场的使用者,要多为他人着想避免过度喧哗。 “我们过去确实收到居民指新生儿被嘈杂声吵醒的投诉。”但就连蓝彬明本身也不清楚,告示牌怎么会呈现这样的用词。 他表示,有关告示牌约在六年前有该市镇会前任管理树立,但数年来也没有收到投诉。 “市镇会已被指示移除该告示牌,因为我认为它已没有必要了。” 蓝彬明强调可能这个“一次性”的告示牌用词不当,更指说,“较好的表达应该是‘请体谅并避免过分喧哗’。”…

陈清木冀政府设立独立审查机构 检讨巴蒂一案疏失

前进党秘书长陈清木医生,呼吁政府应设立独立审查机构,以检讨各造在调查和审理前女佣巴蒂一案中出现的疏失。 印尼籍前女佣巴蒂,曾在樟宜机场集团前主席廖文良家中帮佣,然而后者却在2016年10月28日开除巴蒂,两日后再报警指控巴蒂偷走于5万元财物,包括名表、Prada的名牌包和Gucci墨镜等。 巴蒂再去年被国家法院判监禁26个月,惟在本月4日,终高庭推翻判决,沉冤得雪。巴蒂一案近两周来引起国人议论,并关注女佣在整个审讯中处于弱势的地位。高庭法官陈成安判决中,更形容廖家父子报警可能存在“不当意图”,被告有充分理由投诉人力部,而廖家“先下手为强”将他开除。 对于上述案件,陈清木表示国人欣见正义终获伸张,也相信包括总检察署和警方等各造,都会如律政部兼内政部长尚穆根所言,将对调查环节中究竟哪些问题出了错,作出检讨。 他毫不怀疑内政部和总检察署,都将适时地发表检讨报告。然而毕竟内政部等各造并非独立、100巴仙客观的,故此政府理应设立独立审查机构,批判和全面地审查此案中出现疏失的部分,并且提出建议改善。 “适当的问责乃是要我们找出问题根源,且不仅仅是否乃个人认为疏忽引起的,因为找代罪羔羊并无助解决问题。”陈清木指出,比起责怪或开除问题人物,更应该去检视是否有体制上、程序上和问责制衡的疏失。 高庭法官陈成安,在判决中也点出所谓“赃物”移交警局过程存在疑点。包括廖家声称开箱检查女佣留下的三大箱子,并报警后,警方未立即取走证物。由于高庭法官的判词,也针对警方的调查工作,这也致使警方需出面回应此事,表示将展开调查。

Facebook user’s act of kindness sparks a wave of emotions

Facebook user Claris Ortega shared an experienced she had at the Clementi…