Singapore – October 16, 2016: the Central Provident Fund is a compulsory comprehensive savings plan for working Singaporeans and permanent residents (Photo by macashop from Shutterstock).

A total of S$211 million has been left unclaimed with the Insolvency and Public Trustee’s Office (IPTO) over the last six years, largely made up of Central Provident Fund (CPF) money. The monies were left behind by people who died with no benefactor nominated.
The IPTO received S$63.2 million of unnominated CPF money last year alone, belonging to 3,450 individuals.
That’s a lot of money left unclaimed. The question is, why?
In January, we published a letter sent in by Zol who highlighted the issue he was having with adjusting his CPF payouts to match his needs.
The 65-year old, who is married with no children, said he received a letter from CPF informing him to either apply for a monthly retirement payout at 65 years old or delay it until he is 70 for a higher payout sum. Mr Zol was expecting this.
However, he was surprised to find out that CPF had calculated his monthly payouts to last 28 years.
Mr Zol wrote, “the one thing that shocked me was that I could only receive $482 monthly from June 2019 under the CPF Retirement Sum Scheme, and this payout would last about 28 years, when I would be 93 years old.”
He explained that he wrote to CPF to request for a 20-year payout instead which would mean a higher payout that will last until he is about 85. Mr Zol based this on the average life expectancy of Singaporean as reported in the media of 85.4 years.
Recent statistics from the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority’s (ICA) Registry of Births and Deaths support Mr Zol’s estimate, or rather it is even lower. In 2017, a report by the ICA showed the average age at death for Malays is 70.6 years while for Indians and other ethnic groups, it is 69.5 and 65.9 years respectively. The average age of the Chinese stands at 78.
This shows that, on average, ethnic minority Singaporeans do not live to the age of eligibility for automatic CPF monthly payouts, they won’t get to use their CPF monies in their lifetime.
Unfortunately, CPF merely rejected Mr Zol’s request, citing ‘current policies’ as the reason’.
“And we members were never consulted,” said Mr Zol, referring to the CPF policy.
“However, if you search the CPF website on “CPF-Your Assurance in Retirement”, this article states that “…. you can choose your desired amount of monthly payouts to meet your retirement needs…”
Indeed, the CPF website does say that a member can choose their desired amount of monthly payouts to meet their needs
Mr Zol lamented, “As I am married with no children, I need to support myself from now till death. If I cannot secure a job from now till 70 years old, what do I survive on during this 5-year period if I opt in at 70 years old?”
He went on to comment that the 4% CPF interest may not even cover inflation and the progressive increase in GST in Singapore.
“If using present value to evaluate the 2 options (ie. start the plan at 65 or 70 years old), the best decision is to withdraw all my CPF money now,” says Mr Zol.
He goes on to say, “In light of my situation (ie. married with no children), it is totally illogical to suggest a payout term of 28 years. When my wife and I pass on, there is no one to receive my balance payout.”
Anticipating the rebuttal that the government is merely looking out for its citizens and want to ensure that they have a steady income in their old age, Mr Zol argues that even if he does use up his CPF retirement sum by the time he is 85, he can sell his 5-room flat to support himself without external financial help.
Mr Zol’s predicament is understandable and the points he raised are worth noting. Since CPF is essentially the hard-earned savings of each individual, shouldn’t they be able to decide on their own payout amounts and period?
As given that Mr Zol has no children, as he says, who would he nominate to receive his CPF savings should he pass on before he uses it all up? Would it then end up in as part of the unclaimed sum under the Public Trustee’s Office (PTO)?

What happens to unclaimed CPF monies?

Now, by default, CPF monies of a deceased person will go to anyone they have nominated as a beneficiary. However, if no one has been nominated, the monies will be transferred to the PTA for distribution to their family members under the Intestate Succession Act or the Inheritance Certificate (for Muslims).
According to Section 7 of the Act, the spouse and children get top priority for inheriting the money followed by parents, siblings, grandparents, and finally aunties and uncles.
Lawyers whom The Straits Times spoke to said that the amount of unclaimed CPF monies is likely to rise as the population ages and family sizes shrink.
“I do foresee this sum growing, particularly given the rise in the number of elderly folk living alone. More Singaporeans may choose to remain unmarried and so more people may not see the need to make a nomination or simply do not have the time to do it,” said Ms Norhakim Shah, a senior associate at I.R.B. Law.
Associate director of PKWA Law, Ms Charlene Nah, told ST that small family units which have experienced successive deaths in a short period of time could also account for the increase in unclaimed CPF monies as beneficiaries die before they can claim the CPF monies.
The question of what PTO does with the unclaimed monies was raised in Parliament on 4 November. Senior Minister for State Edwin Tong said that PTO will contact individuals who are known to possibly have an interest in a deceased member’s unnominated CPF monies, inviting them to make an application to claim those funds.
These are people who either approach the CPF Board to inform them of the deceased’s passing, those listed as the death informant in ICA records, and family members of the deceased as reflected in ICA’s records.
According to Mr Tong, PTO managed to distribute 88% of unnominated CPF monies over the last five years.
He added, “As at end 2018, unclaimed, unnominated CPF monies make up 132 million of the 211 million of unclaimed monies held by PTO. PTO continues to make efforts to locate the legally entitled beneficiaries of unclaimed monies and they do so by making phone calls, writing to them in several occasions, and also in some cases making house visits.”
He then encouraged individuals who may be legally entitled to the money to submit their application, noting that there is no time limit. People can come forward at any time to make their claim.
Mr Tong also explained, “To ensure that the monies are distributed to the rightful applicants, PTO requires that an applicant produce documentary proof to support his claim and also the eligibility entitlement. Where necessary, PTO will assist the applicant to obtain the necessary documents from the relevant agencies by making a request on behalf of the applicant or also supporting the request for information.”
When asked by Non-Constituency Member of Parliament Daniel Goh why some people might end up not making a claim for the monies, Mr Tong said that most people who PTO reaches out to will make the claim. The monies left unclaimed are for those who PTO has been yet unable to trace.
Now, the S$211 million in PTO left unclaimed is for the past six years only. TOC reached out to the Ministry of Law on 22 October to ask what was the unclaimed amount in previous years but have yet to receive a reply.
The question is, will Singaporeans end up dying before they are able to spend their CPF monies? And will they know where that money goes in the event of their death, especially given that many like Mr Zol do not have beneficiaries to nominate?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Emergency evacuation at MBFC Tower 3 after a new case of Covid-19 at DBS Asia Central was confirmed

Today, after an employee was confirmed to be infected with the Wuhan…

过去两周内曾前往中国,近千师生被要求请假14天

教育部今日(31日)表示,共有967名来自学校、理工学院以及工艺教育学院(Institute of Technical Education)的师生必须休假14天。 此前,当局曾宣布在过去两周,曾前往中国的师生必须申请14天缺席假。 这包括教育部幼儿园、中小学以及初级学院。其中,一名教师与学生曾从湖北省回新,而其他人则前往中国其他地区。 当局表示,该项措施能有效减轻学校与其他机构带来的潜在风险,让学校持续运作。目前休假的学生被安排在家中学习。学生也可以透过网络在线平台进行学习。 当局补充,根据卫生部规定,近期到过湖北并申请缺席假的学生,如果被评估为染病高风险群,可被勒令隔离。 教育部也称日前收到民众的询问,有关曾前往中国的学生未能申报一事,发现有些旅客于去年12月亦曾从中国返新的,但由于已过了潜伏期,因此请假也不适用于他们。 当局也敦促家长与学生应通知学校,并进行必要的检查。 教育部长王乙康表示,“针对此事,我们将采取必要措施,确保人民的安全,但同时也不应让恐惧支配我们的生活,所以要保持弹性与警惕,必须对社会负责,尽可能让生活持续。”

自杀事故频传 当局受促关注疫情下客工精神健康

针对近期频传客工企图自杀事件,本地非政府组织思想中心(Think Centre)提醒政府正视冠病19疫情,对整体新加坡社会,特别是客工群体带来的精神疲劳问题。 即使没有因为感染被隔离,然而大部分客工都被关在封闭的宿舍内,且需要遵守更严格的管制措施,若违规也同样要被重罚。 思想中心提醒,许多客工如今仍住在拥挤的环境,在疫情下面对不确定的就业前景、收入问题和感染风险,无可避免地精神和心理上也会受到影响。同时,也可能加剧其他疾病或问题。 “即使能保持联系,但他们会感到远离家乡能给家人的帮助有限,亦可能提升焦虑和忧郁的风险。” 为此,思想中心呼吁当局应对客工进行民调,并设立由民间组织、商会和雇主的工作小组,以落实改善客工生活条件的目标,同时检讨疫情下的问题,包括被欠薪、扩大客工应对失业的社会保障,以及照顾他们的身心灵健康等。 与此同时,与相关客工的使馆、领事合作,安排安全等遣返计划。同时工作小组应纳入诸如客工组织、专业翻译服务等,提升协助客工的效益。 思想中心也提醒,新加坡也是东盟保障客工权益共识的签约国。为此也有责任保障客工基本权益和福利。 若客工陷入困难,可联系: 客工中心(Migrant Workers’ Centre):6536-2692…

MP De Souza announces setting up site to house migrant workers as part of Ulu Pandan’s contribution to fight COVID-19

Holland-Bukit Timah GRC MP Christopher de Souza posted a Facebook note on…