About 70 food-delivery riders showed up at the Meet-the-People Session (MPS) held in Taman Jurong yesterday evening (11 Nov) to urge the government to lift it’s e-scooter ban on footpaths.
Dressed in their food-delivery attire, they expressed their concerns to Mr Ang Wei Neng, Member of Parliament (MP) for Jurong GRC, who sat in to hear their appeal on behalf of Senior Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam – who was overseas.
However, things got really heated half way through the session as a few of the riders lamented their frustrations with great intensity.
A 5-minute footage capturing the dramatic discourse has been circulating across social media since last night. In the video, an elderly man can be seen gesturing angrily at Mr Ang as he called out the government for implementing the ban.
“Can the government withdraw the law? Take back the law! Can? Yes or no?” the elderly man shouted.
Subsequently, a man at the back proclaimed, “We are human, not dog!”
“Can you give us the S$7 million? Can you give us on the spot the S$7 million that we need? On the spot!” the elderly man continued.
The elderly man was most likely referring to the newly introduced S$7 million e-scooter trade-in grant announced by the Land Transport Authority (LTA) last Friday (8 Nov).
The crowd then applauded the elderly man for voicing out. But, the elderly man had more to say.
“You take back all our freedom! You take all our freedom! You see… and now we become enemies! We are enemies inside our own country! Are you running a communist law now?” he added furiously.
With the sudden escalation of tension, the crowd proceeded to calm the elderly man down while thanking him for taking a bold stance.
Another man then quickly interjected as he raised a concern on the eagerness of Singaporeans to put up pictures and videos of e-scooter riders on social media, tarnishing the reputation of all PMD users as a result.
He went on to suggest that members of the public are the “ones offending us and triggering our tempers here”.
“We don’t owe them anything! We are not their slaves! We have served the country, we have contributed to our nation! Yet we never get any benefits from the government!” he noted fervently as the crowd projects their agreement via applause and cheers.
Later on, a woman stood up in front of Mr Ang to say that a rider apparently had his personal information recorded by an officer for defying the ban and was told that he would be subjected to a fine if caught again.
Not much could be heard from Mr Ang throughout the whole video, although he did tell the crowd that he will take note of all their feedback from the session.
Watch the full video here:

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Clearing the Haze: Solutions at hand

“Clearing the Haze” is a feature series by The Online Citizen that…

疫情当前 吴作栋:我本预期执政党能有更好战绩

前任总理吴作栋在上月的一次专访中坦言,对于2020大选成绩感到意外,疫情当前,原本预计人民会选择走安全一步,执政党理应能有更好的表现。 他在于上月27日接受《海峡时报》的访问。询及本届选举成绩,吴作栋表示感到相当意外,尤其是工人党拿下两个集选区和一个单选区,而且人民行动党的整体支持率也下降至61.2巴仙。 “老实说,我本预期执政党会因为疫情的原因,能有更好的表现,因为我相信人民通常都会选择走安全的一步。” “然而,我不认为执政党有应对年轻一代的需求。执政党强调疫情等挑战,但年轻一代会认为,处理疫情本就是您的本分,那么他们(年轻人)的期许又当如何?” 尽管已卸下议员身份,惟吴作栋仍是荣誉国务资政,同时接任人民协会高级顾问,并继续协助推进与印度和缅甸的关系。 吴作栋:年轻一代期待更多元的声音代表 他也提出年轻一代会期待有更多元的声音能够代表他们。 “就政治情绪和期望而言,我们已经到达一个拐点,但令我惊讶的是新加坡竟以这般速度到达这个点。” “我期待能够有所改变,但并非是现在,我预计或许会在2025年发生,当第四代领导人接管后,会在领导层产生变化。如果不是也会是在这之后。” 至于即将接手的总理职位的王瑞杰和陈振声,他也指出第四代领导人并没有在政治表现出来,虽然他们很精明、称职、勤奋、也善于管理部门,但他们仍未表现出政治敏锐度与领导能力。 王瑞杰于本届大选中以53.4巴仙险胜,守住议席,在11万5千912的总票中,以7千769票获胜。

SDP’s Dr Paul Tambyah voices disappointment towards Google’s “shocking” ban of political ads in Singapore; demands explanation for the decision

On 3 December (Tuesday), the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) revealed in a…

陈振声称香港局势达临界点

新加坡贸工部长陈振声认为,香港目前持续的抗争已达“临界点”(breaking point),我国密切关注事态进展。 他是在昨日于办公处接受访问时指出,除非能恢复平静和重启对话和建设性行动,否则香港的未来和现有施政模式能否维系都是个疑问。 他强调我国希望香港局势改善,但也提醒如果新加坡变得自满,发生在香港的也很容易在我国上演。 陈振声认为香港局势对新加坡有“四大启示”:其一是有效的施政制度,可解决问题和改善民生,“不论政治制度和政党利益,领导需把人民和国家利益放在首位。”此外,还需要有完善的反馈机制和有效沟通,根据需要作调整。 其二是政府的长期政策是否成功不能从短期视角来考量,需取决能否让下一代做得更好,他也指太多政府和社会过于关注眼前和国内议题,对长远和外部局势缺乏考量。 他也意有所指地提到基本设施和可负担得起房屋,对确保社会稳定的重要。他举例世代间的土地和产业转让,不应剥夺后代努力获得回报的机会。 陈振声提到过去有建议把土地销售纳入预算案,以及让私人发展商可囤积土地以准备完整项目,不过他表示政府把国家发展特别是公共组屋作为优先事项,所以避免把政府措施扭曲成把土地销售利益最大化。 此外,他也提到“新加坡式”的对话和建设性行动,避免以暴力解决问题,也提及“暴力指挥引发更大的暴力”;同时,需思索如何在世界舞台立足,确保我国的独特性,为企业和劳工扩大机遇。 香港抗争:街道、校园沦为战场 而事实上,香港“反送中”抗争已持续近半年之久,然而在示威者提出的五大诉求中,并没有提及对香港住房或生活成本情况的不满。 示威者五大诉求为:撤回修例、收回暴动定义、撤销对反送中抗争者控罪、彻底追究警队滥权以及落实“真普选”。但如今只落实了一项,即撤回备受争议的逃犯条例。…