Trade and Industry Minister Chan Chun Sing said on Saturday (9 Nov) that the Singapore-India Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA) does not grant Indian nationals unconditional access into Singapore or immigration privileges.
Claims that the bilateral agreement has cost job opportunities for Singaporeans aim to stoke fears in times of economic uncertainties, said Mr Chan.
Media reports over Chan’s statement noted that there have been falsehoods surfacing in relation to free trade agreements (FTAs).
Channel News Asia noted one of such falsehoods is that CECA has allowed Indian nationals to take PMET (professional, managerial, executive and technician) jobs away from Singaporeans.
Mr Chan in his statement to the press, clarified that all FTAs, including CECA, place no obligations on Singapore with regard to immigration.
“Indian professionals, like any other professionals from other countries, have to meet MOM’s (Ministry of Manpower’s) existing qualifying criteria to work in Singapore. This applies to Employment Pass, S Pass, and work permit.
“Second, CECA does not give Indian nationals privileged immigration access. Anyone applying for Singapore citizenship must qualify according to our existing criteria,” said Mr Chan.
In response to claims that Singaporeans have lost out on PMET jobs, Mr Chan pointed out that the country’s network of FTAs has, in fact, increased these jobs by 400,000 to 1.25 million since 2005.

However, he did not state how many PMET jobs have been created from CECA. Not to mention, that there was an explosion in numbers of Permanent Residents during the period that Chan had stated. Clearly, the new PRs and new citizens converted from PRs, are those who take up PMET jobs as Immigration and Checkpoint Authority states that only a holder of an Employment Pass or S Pass is eligible to apply for PR.
While Mr Chan acknowledged that economic uncertainties have created anxieties over job security, he asserted that perpetuating fear, is not the right response.
“We understand, and we share Singaporeans’ concerns with competition and job prospects in the current uncertain economic environment. But the way to help Singaporeans is not to mislead them and create fear and anger,” said Mr Chan.
“The way to help Singaporeans is to make sure that first, we expand our markets for our enterprises. Train our workers constantly to stay ahead of competition. Never allow others to stoke the fears and racial biases of our people. Never do this for selfish personal or political reasons,” he added.
Mr Chan said that MOM is aware of companies that have breached fair hiring practices and will weed them out to protect Singaporean workers and businesses.
Controversial terms of CECA
On 29 June 2005India and Singapore signed CECA. This free trade agreement not only enables Singapore and India to trade goods freely, it also allows professionals to work in each other country more easily.
The CECA was concluded after 13 rounds of negotiation and the Singapore’s side was led by none other than Heng Swee Keat, the current PM-in-waiting, who was then Permanent Secretary for Trade and Industry. Heng and his team essentially did the ground work together with their Indian counterparts. They then presented their proposals to the politicians for approval.
Some of the areas covered by CECA include: Improved Avoidance of Double Taxation Agreement, Trade in Goods, Customs, Investment, Trade in Services, Intellectual Property, etc.
However, controversial ones include concluding further Mutual Recognition Agreements (MRAs) so as to facilitate the freer movement of professionals between Singapore and India. It helps to recognise each other’s education and professional qualifications so that Indian and Singaporean professionals from the following five professions could be able to practise in each other country:

  1. Accounting and auditing
  2. Architecture
  3. Medical (doctors)
  4. Dental
  5. Nursing

Already, Singapore now recognises degrees of Indian doctors and nurses from certain Indian universities.
Then, CECA also enables movement of persons between both countries. In particular, professionals employed in 127 specific occupations will be allowed entry and stay for up to 1 year or the duration of contract, whichever is less.
Also, intra-corporate transferees (i.e. managers, executives and specialists within organisations) will be permitted to stay and work in India and Singapore for an initial period of up to 2 years or the period of the contract, whichever is less.
The period of stay may be extended for period of up to 3 years at a time for a total term not exceeding 8 years.
Politicians ask about issues and benefits of CECA, with no answer provided
While Mr Chan professes that CECA brings jobs to Singaporeans and Indian nationals do not steal jobs from Singaporeans, there does not seem to be any data that support his claim.
For figures, we know that about 5,400 local professionals, managers, executives, and technicians (PMETs) were retrenched in 2018. Though it is the lowest recorded level since 2014, against a backdrop of local PMET employment growth of about 34,000, PMET accounted for 79.3% of local retrenchment and 2018 also saw a growth of 11,100 foreign S-Passes across all sectors.
Back in 2016, Workers’ Party Non-Constituency Member of Parliament Leon Perera asked the Minister for Manpower about the number of intra-company transferees (ICT) from India that have been approved under the Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA) with India from the year when the agreement came into effect to the latest year for which data is available. But in response, then-Manpower Minister Lim Swee Say said the ministry does not disclose data on foreign manpower with breakdown by nationality, including data on ICTs.
This policy of non-transparency remains the same till today.
Earlier this year, Dr Tan Cheng Bock stated at the official launch of Progress Singapore Party that his party will ask the government to come up with a balance sheet to account for how Singapore has benefited from the India-Singapore Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA) which it signed with India to allow citizens from India and Singapore to travel to each country to seek employment.
“How many local jobs have gone to Indian professionals and how many Singaporeans have gone to India?” asked Dr Tan.
In theory, of course, CECA could also benefit Singaporean professionals wanting to work in India but how many Singaporeans really want to work there to earn in rupees?

Subscribe
Notify of
3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

I like PM Lee :)

I never knew the government did so much and gave us so…

媒体揣测前空军军官傅丽珊 料披“白衣”上阵来届选举

根据《联合早报》专访报导,“揣测”武装部队奖学金得主、前空军中队指挥官傅丽珊,有可能代表人民行动党在来届选举上阵。 报导指出,傅丽珊刚在去年11月,受委为人民行动党三巴旺支部副主席。此后曝光率频频,两个月后先后在许文远和安宁·阿敏这两位三巴旺集选区议员的面簿贴文上亮相;今年1月的社区活动上与四位三巴旺集选区议员同框。 此外,她也成为立国一代配套宣传与联系工作小组一员,还要协助筹备三巴旺集选区首个大型妇女节庆祝活动。 这则报导指三巴旺基层领袖傅丽珊,近期这么高的曝光率,为人们留下“想象空间”,认为她下届大选就会以“白衣人”身份出征。 “如有机会,必全力以赴” 她在受媒体追问时也指出:“基层服务很有意义,让我很有满足感,如果我的确能担起议员责任,我会全力以赴。” 获得武装部队奖学金,傅丽珊毕业自美国伊利诺伊大学厄巴纳—香槟分校(University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign),拥有机械工程和经济双学位。在1999年进入空军担任直升机飞行员。 根据傅丽珊的社交群Linkedin的个人履历,可见她在空军中的优越表现。她曾在国防部担任助理总监,负责“检视武装部队的组织结构和关键能力”,负责检讨国防预算的分配、颠覆性科技、情景规划、风险评估等,关键成果乃是引领第三代武装部队的转型过程。…

Pest control specialists to tackle rat infestation at Bukit Batok

[youtube id=”4QtJMDPGWkA” align=”center” mode=”normal”] Pest control specialists turned up at the hill…

印尼选举结果出炉 雅加达出现蓄意挑衅者引骚乱

印尼选举委员会于周二正式宣布选举结果,现任总统佐科(Joko Widodo)胜选。不过选后印尼出现暴力冲突,有民众与军警对峙,据了解至今早9时,已造成6名民众死亡、200多人受伤。 选举委员会经33天确认各个投票所记录后终于完成正式统计,与快速计票结果相当。根据选举委员会于周二凌晨公布的统计结果,佐科以获得8503万票,占约55.5巴仙;而普拉博沃6844玩票,占44.5巴仙。佐科在结果找中比普拉博沃多了11巴仙,领先得票胜出。 不过,普拉博沃拒绝接受结果,其支持者也发起大规模抗议,超过万人参与。 本月21日,从傍晚至晚间聚集选举监督委员会(Bawaslu)附近抗议的群众,原本都很守秩序,晚间七时许海进行集体夜间祈祷。抗议原本和平结束,惟之后有群众蓄意挑衅。 警察总长:另一批人士蓄意挑衅 至于印尼警察总长Tito Karnavian在22日下午2时许召开的记者招待会,澄清原本集会和平进行,但是在昨晚九点之后,却出现另一批人士蓄意挑衅和犯罪行为,包括有一群青年攻击警察宿舍,以制造骚乱,试图挑起民众对领导人的不满情绪。 他强调,警方在驱离行动中从未使用实弹。 他也透露,当地警方在上周逮捕企图利用枪械制造骚乱的不法分子;在21日则逮捕四名藏有手枪的人士。据警方情报,这些人士有意藉此制造死伤事件而引起群众对政府的不满。 印尼合格选民约1亿9000万人,而此次有近80巴仙的投票率;有效票数约1亿5000万张。 而佐科在经历这长期且分裂的选举中获得1690万的票数,是5年前第一次参选时的两倍,也再次证明他以改革印尼的施政受到广泛印尼公民认同。…