From Tuesday (5 November) onwards, electric scooters were banned on footpaths in Singapore, and this has caused much unhappiness among PMD riders, especially those who depend on the devices for their livelihoods, like food delivery workers.
As such, the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) offered a number of alternative solutions to this problem, and this was written in the party’s website as well as shared by SDP’s chief Chee Soon Juan on his Facebook page.

“The ban on personal mobile devices or PMDs have caused much unhappiness among its users especially those who depend on such devices for a living, for example, food deliverers,” SDP stated.
It added, “This is a difficult situation because of accidents caused by PMD riders on footpaths in the past that have resulted in injuries and even death. The dangers of PMD use on footpaths must not be taken lightly.”
Although SDP acknowledges that the safety of pedestrians is the top priority and irresponsible PMD riders should be punished, the party also asserted that imposing a complete ban of such vehicles on footpaths is “problematic”, as it “affects the livelihood” of other responsible users.
As such, the party listed down 8 solutions that can be explored, instead of just banning PMDs on footpaths.

  • Restrict PMD use to those who depend on them for a living eg. food deliverers; exclude recreational users except in parks.
  • Set an age limit.
  • Register users and regulate usage eg. areas of operation, routes they take, time of operation, etc.
  • Require registered users to attend a course on rules and regulations on PMD use.
  • Ensure that vehicles are equipped with safety equipment such as proximity alarm devices.
  • Set speed limits, lower them during peak hours when human traffic is high and school zones. ‘Speed strips’ to prevent speeding could also be constructed on footpaths.
  • Ensure that users dismount from their PMDs and push their devices at busy intersections such as MRT entrances/exits.
  • In the longer term, set aside bike/PMD lanes like bus lanes. The use of PMDs and bicycles on footpaths can then be phased out.

The party added that there are definitely alternative ways to deal with the problem, and outright banning of PMDs is the “easy and lazy way out”.
“If we put our heads together, we can arrive at a safe and acceptable solution where responsible users can operate their vehicles without compromising the safety of pedestrians.”
The ban of PMDs on footpaths kicked in one day after Senior Minister of State for Transport Lam Pin Min announced it in Parliament on Monday (4 November).
Dr Lam said on Monday that it was a “difficult decision” to prohibit e-scooters from being used on footpaths, but “it is a necessary step for pedestrians to feel safe again on public paths, while still allowing e-scooters to grow in tandem with cycling path infrastructure”.
Although e-scooters are banned from being used on roads and footpaths in the Republic, but it will still be allowed on cycling paths and Park Connector Networks (PCNs).
Those found guilty of the crime can be fined up to S$2,000 and jail time of up to three months once the ban is strictly enforced from 2020.
From now till 31 December 2019, there will be an advisory period where offenders will be given warnings, in order to give time for e-scooter riders to adjust to the changes.
“From 1 January 2020, a zero-tolerance approach will be taken and those caught riding an e-scooter on footpaths will face regulatory action. Offenders are liable for fines up to S$2,000 and/or face imprisonment of up to 3 months, if convicted,” LTA warned.
However, bicycles and Personal Mobility Aids (PMAs) like motorised wheelchairs will not be subjected to the footpaths ban, and will also be allowed on all cycling paths and PCNs.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Learning according to capabilities, not age

By Jenn Lee – Since PM Lee’s National Day Rally speech exhorting…

政府邀百人组工作组 检讨“新加坡公民之旅”内容

自2011年起,新公民在领取公民证书前,都需参加名为“新加坡公民之旅”(Singapore Citizenship Journey)的活动。 活动由国民融合理事会、人民协会和移民关卡局联合推出。这些活动包括上网了解我国历史背景、政策、参观本地古迹和参与分享会等,旨在协助新公民融入我国。 据了解,目前文化、社区及青年部有意邀请100位来自社会不同背景的新加坡公民,组成工作小组,以探讨上述活动内容,收集意见。 部长傅海燕是在昨日向媒体透露,国民融合理事会在去年迎来十周年,故此探讨上述活动内容适逢其时。 她认为,对于新公民应具备哪些特征,应征询国人意见并达成共识。 例如有者反馈成为新公民定义不应仅限于与新加坡人结婚;加之也应理解我国的社会规范、在这里定居许久或已参与国民服役等。 工作小组将在今年3月至7月间,进行讨论会,而公众也能上网提供意见;之后讲提呈报告书,建议预计年底才逐步落实。 目前国人可在下月21日截止日期前,上网申请成为工作小组成员:https://www.ideas.gov.sg/public/cw_scj

Woman attempted suicide multiple times in bid to give family her CPF monies and insurance payout

“I am very depressed and suicidal due to my illness and also…

因停车费引争执视频流传 摩根大通吁员工保持素养

员工因为10元隔夜停车费和保安人员起争执,新加坡全球金融服务公司摩根大通(J.P. Morgan)发出邮件,呼吁员工提高个人素质,包括尊重他人及自重。 摩根大通是针对于周末(10月26日)在社交媒体上流传,有关一名印裔男子基于朋友来访,却为了0元隔夜停车费和保安人员起争执,无礼表示自己花大钱(150万元)买下公寓,却要为了停车费被为难。 印裔男子也以上位者的口气“命令”保安人员,让公寓管理层联络他,甚至说出类似种族主义的言论。然而,面对其咆哮和无礼,保安人员只是坚持立场地表示,“我只是在执行责任”。 虽然最后印裔男妥协了,上了朋友的车子到地下停车场,但是有关的视频已经在网上疯传,甚至成为了隔日新闻的头条之一。 据悉,有关事件发生在文庆一带的Eight Riversuites 公寓,而印裔男子也被网民起底,是一名来自印度的专才拉美斯(Ramesh Erramalli),曾经在我国的摩根大通工作。 拒绝公布员工细节 据《海峡时报》指出,当局已意识到有关视频的流传,并且正视有关问题,惟,他们拒绝对拉美斯的工资和在该公司就职时间作出回应。 有关的电邮是由跨国投资银行的新加坡总部高级官员,Edmund…