“Food Panda” delivery man riding on an electric bicycle doing deliveries at Geylang Road. (Image by Terence Toh Chin Eng / Shutterstock.com)

On Tuesday (5 November), electric scooters were banned from all footpaths in Singapore, after Senior Minister of State for Transport Lam Pin Min announced it a day earlier in Parliament.
The Land Transport Authority (LTA) said in a statement that despite “significant efforts” to regulate the use of such personal mobility devices (PMDs) using laws and to educate the public in using such devices responsibly, “offences relating to errant behaviour and incidents involving e-scooters remained on an upward trend”.
Dr Lam said on Monday that it was a “difficult decision” to prohibit e-scooters from being used on footpaths, but “it is a necessary step for pedestrians to feel safe again on public paths, while still allowing e-scooters to grow in tandem with cycling path infrastructure”.
Although e-scooters are banned from being used on roads and footpaths in the Republic, but it will still be allowed on cycling paths and Park Connector Networks (PCNs).
Those found guilty of the crime can be fined up to S$2,000 and jail time of up to three months once the ban is strictly enforced from 2020.
From now till 31 December 2019, there will be an advisory period where offenders will be given warnings, in order to give time for e-scooter riders to adjust to the changes.
“From 1 January 2020, a zero-tolerance approach will be taken and those caught riding an e-scooter on footpaths will face regulatory action. Offenders are liable for fines up to S$2,000 and/or face imprisonment of up to 3 months, if convicted,” LTA warned.
However, bicycles and Personal Mobility Aids (PMAs) like motorised wheelchairs will not be subjected to the footpaths ban, and will also be allowed on all cycling paths and PCNs.

Angry PMD riders

Following the announcement of the ban, one group that is badly affected is of course the PMD riders, especially those who use it as their livelihoods like food delivery riders.
Venting his frustration, Afiq Azman said in a YouTube video that he depends on PMD as a source of income.
“This (ban) has been a concern for a lot of PMD riders, like myself, because a lot of riders depend on this device for income. A lot of them do it for GrabFood, Foodpanda, Deliveroo and other food delivery apps as well,” Mr Afiq said.
However, the biggest issue he has with the ban is that the Government failed to understand that PMD users have to use combined paths – PCNs, Housing and Development Board (HDB) and footpaths – to reach their destination.
As an example, he noted that there isn’t any PCN that connects from his house to Woodlands MRT. As such, he will have no choice now but to push his PMD till he reaches a PCN. “The problem with the ban is that they (PMD riders) have no other alternative but to walk,” lamented Mr Afiq.
If that’s not all, he also said that the sudden ban has come as a shock to a lot of users, and it will also cause a dip in demand for the device as the public has no idea on how to use PMDs anymore.
“From my point of view, the problem with PMDs are that riders are not taking responsibility for the safety of other users in the paths. This is why the Government decided to ban it. But at the end of the day, the actions of a few errant users have cause inconvenience to a lot of other users who follow the rules,” he said.
He continued, “For now, I hope the Government can deliver their promise of an enhanced PCN network that will allow PMD users like us to continue using our PMDs in a safer environment.”

LTA said on Monday (4 November) that it intends to “triple” the current distance of cycling paths from 440km by 2030, adding that all HDB towns will have a cycling path by that year.
Separately, another PMD user that goes by the name Acai Berry also posted a video on YouTube expressing his anger towards Dr Lam for making such a sudden announcement.
“Your news is very shocking! You’re destroying lives, especially food delivery people who use PMDs. I don’t think you fit to be Minister,” he said, referring to Dr Lam.
He added that the Ministry first announced that PMDs are fire hazard, forcing all users to change their device to follow the UL2272 standard. Suppliers brought in UL2272 complying models into the market, and chances are they might not be able to sell it now due to the ban, the user said.
As such, he suggested Dr Lam to come up with different solution to curb the problem, instead of just banning it on footpaths.
“Give another solution. If footpaths cannot ride, then have to give another solution. Maybe ride on the left side of the road for the footpath distance. First cannot use on roads, then HDB and now footpaths,” he said.
https://business.facebook.com/kingasiakelvin/videos/2547966991935968/

Previous changes

PMDs like e-scooters were first introduced in Singapore in 2013. Although it gained popularity among the people in the country, but it soon began to make negative headlines due to behaviour of certain errant users which contributed to high number of accidents involving such devices, several of which were fatal.
Prior to the latest ban on footpaths, the Government announced that since 15 January 2018, under the Road Traffic Act, it is illegal for PMDs – such as e-scooters and hoverboards – to be used on Singapore roads, with first-time offenders subject to a fine of up to S$2,000, a jail term of up to three months, or both.
Then in May 2018, the Active Mobility Act kicked in and enforced new rules like lowering the speed limit for the devices on footpaths from 15 kmh to 10kmh, mandatory use of helmets by cyclists on roads and “stop and look” requirement for all active mobility device users.
Following that, in July this year, the Land Transport Authority (LTA) announced that all e-scooters and electric bikes must be registered and the devices have to comply with the UL2272 certification.
UL2272 is a safety standard that will reduce the risk of fire and it assesses the devices at the “system level”. This means that it looks at the full spectrum of use conditions, instead of evaluating only individual parts, hence remarkably reducing the risk of fires. Certification involves a series of electrical, mechanical and environmental tests.
From 1 September 2019 onwards, riders were also banned from riding their PMDs at void decks and common corridors at 15 town councils under the People’s Action Party (PAP).
Despite all the previous changes with the rules, the latest ban on all footpaths in Singapore came unannounced. The ban kicked in just one day after it was announced.
As such, the biggest question here is what happens to the suppliers and those who just bought their PMDs?
They are now left in the lurch as it becomes impractical for people to use e-scooters anymore as they have to push the device for most of the time.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Speaker of Parliament Tan Chuan-Jin appointed as deputy chairman for Mandai Park Holdings

Mandai Park Holdings (MPH) has just announced that Speaker of Parliament Tan…

马国组屋挂灯笼 中秋佳节气氛浓

中秋将至,马来西亚森美兰州芙蓉市,两栋14楼组屋,几乎每个组屋单位都在阳台装上红灯笼,夜幕降临亮灯,组屋红彤彤的一片,佳节气氛浓厚。 根据马国媒体报导,这些组屋居民,是获得当地州议员赠送超过500盏红灯笼,配合中秋佳节装饰;州议员也在上周前往进行亮灯仪式,办中秋晚会、猜灯谜等社区活动。

社企处处收费小贩开销重 食评家致函部长抱不平

早前,环境与水源部高级政务部长许连碹博士,在国会指出,环境局将要求社会企业运营小贩中心,成本和收费需透明化,任何额外收费也需获得环境局批准,确保小贩中心的租金可负担得起。 对此,本地知名食评家司徒国辉再次于“食尊”网站,致部长许连碹公开信,呼吁国家环境局接管小贩中心,以维持小贩低营运成本,才能让消费者享用价格廉宜美食。 (转载自”食尊”网站) 致部长许连碹博士的公开信 请维护公共小贩中心 感谢您着手探讨社会企业小贩中心所施行的不公平措施,要求这些社企把附加费用透明化和非强制收费。不过请容许我分享我的意见,此事不仅关乎收费透明化,公共小贩中心总体运营开销过高更应关注。 您说社企小贩中心的租金和开销媲美其他私人食阁,但我认为,如果再拿百余家环境局小贩中心和咖啡店(其中有好些已由职总富食客营运)相对比,差异九十分明显。作为私营企业,私人食阁有权征收他们认为适合的收费。 原本我以为东部地区的小贩遇到的合约条款是最糟的,直到有位来自社企小贩中心的小贩,和我分享他们的困境,那才是糟糕透顶。 直到下个租户签约为止,租金照付 这小贩在一家本地知名连锁食阁管理的社企小贩中心,经营面谈。一年后,由于客流量走下坡生意难以维续,这名小贩决定放弃每月4千元营销(包括基本租金和比租金超过一倍的服务费)的面摊。 令我惊异的是,他们还得继续付还最低两千元的租金至合约期限终止,或者直到新租户接手。(管理层的条款参考下图) 这位小贩较后转移到位于住宅区的私人咖啡店经营,租金和运营费相同,但是却又较高客流量。但与此同时,他们还得缴付先前社企小贩中心的违约“惩罚”租金。…

政府斥资1亿元发展地铁员工人力,减轻铁路公司的运营成本

为提升新加坡铁路工人的培训,扩大铁路工人的技能,政府将斥资1亿新元的地铁人力发展配套(Rail Manpower Development Package,简称RMDP),以减轻铁路公司的营运成本。 基础建设统筹部长兼交通部长许文远在上周五(8日)宣布RMDP将成为未来五年捷运与轻轨的主要培训资金。 “运营商目前的财务状况并不佳,为了避免培训课程被压制,政府将透过陆交局进行联合投资,提高员工的生产力与更好的完成工作,提升通勤的服务水平”,许文远表示。 则也是为了应付未来10年将增减三条新地铁线,所需的劳动队伍。 SMRT地铁( SMRT Trains)此前在官网公布数据,截至今年三月的2019财年,该公司蒙受1亿5500万元的巨额亏损。 据陆交局表示,RMDP是为铁路运营商与全国运输工人工会的桥梁,确保跟进所有培训课程,并在投资各项的硬件设备如模拟器与虚拟现实工具,让员工能够在接近真实的情况下训练。 全国运输工人工会执行秘书杨益财则对政府的举措相当满意,称工会在人力培训上投入许多资金,实现了部分的计划。 杨益财表示,“我们意识到,铁路运营商面临维护投资与人力培训的两难,但若要打招世界级的公共交通系统,势必需要由世界级人才的建造。”…