Source : LTA Facebook page.

The ban of electric scooters on footpaths kicked in today (5 November) in Singapore, and those found guilty of the crime can be fined up to S$2,000 and jail time of up to three months once the ban is strictly enforced from 2020.
The Land Transport Authority (LTA) said in a statement that despite “significant efforts” to regulate the use of such personal mobility devices (PMDs) using laws and to educate the public in using such devices responsibly, “offences relating to errant behaviour and incidents involving e-scooters remained on an upward trend”.
Although e-scooters are banned from being used on roads in the Republic, but it will still be allowed on cycling paths and Park Connector Networks (PCNs).
Senior Minister of State for Transport Lam Pin Min said in Parliament on Monday (4 November) that the ban follows Japan and France’s move to prohibit the riding of e-scooters on its pavements.
He said that France just banned the use of e-scooters on pavements last week, following the high number of accidents involving such devices, several of which were fatal. Those found guilty of riding their e-scooters on pavements will now be subject to a €135 fine in France.
“Cities have allowed the use of such devices on footpaths as they are non-pollutive, inexpensive and, of properly used, convenient for short intra-town travels. We expected the co-sharing of footpaths to be challenging but were hopeful that with public education, PMD users would be gracious and responsible. Unfortunately, this was not so,” Dr Lam said.
As such, he noted that it was a “difficult decision” to prohibit e-scooters from being used on footpaths. “But it is a necessary step for pedestrians to feel safe again on public paths, while still allowing e-scooters to grow in tandem with cycling path infrastructure,” he added.

Ban in France and Japan

In September 2019, France banned the use of e-scooters on pavements, after an increasing number of e-scooters in the country caused tensions with residents.
After the device was introduced in the French capital last year, about 15,000 scooters were seen in the city and the number is expected to increase to 40,000 by the end of 2019.
France’s Transport Minister Elisabeth Borne said to Le Parisien daily that those who found to be riding an e-scooter, monowheel, personal transporter or hoverboard on the pavement will be imposed a fine of €135.
She added that the riders will now have to use the street or dedicated cycling paths, so that “pedestrians are no longer squeezed against walls”.
However, riders are still permitted to push their devices on the pavement, as long as the engine is turned off.
As for Japan, e-scooters are viewed as motorised bicycles under the traffic law in the country, based on a 2002 notice from the Japanese National Police Agency. This means that the devices have to come with license plates and side mirrors, and a driver’s license is required to operate. Without these, electric scooters are considered illegal unless it’s used on privately owned land.
On top of that, they must also be ridden on the road alongside cars and other vehicles. This applies to other types of transportations with a battery, like other micromobility options such as unicycles.
Singapore’s restrictions on PMDs more severe than Japan and France
Therefore, though countries such as Japan and France banned PMDs from being used on pavements, they are allowed to be used on roads.

However, under the Road Traffic Act, it is illegal for PMDs – such as e-scooters and hoverboards – to be used on Singapore roads from 15 Jan 2018, with first-time offenders subject to a fine of up to $2,000, a jail term of up to three months, or both.
 
This, however, was not mentioned by Dr Lam in his speech as he made references to the practice of other cities.  While Dr Lam stressed that it is not a complete ban of PMDs as they can be still be ridden on cycling path and the park connectors, but what is the difference in light of the restrictions imposed upon the PMDs?
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

公积金局称申诉老翁已领出14万 网民非议当局公开会员财务个资

七旬私召车司机申诉,自己每月只能从公积金领取575元,无法负担自己和妻子的生活。但开私召车,又被要求要填补保健储蓄。对此公积金局在昨日在脸书发声明,这名司机在55岁时已领出14万元,更指如果当初他没领钱,每月领入息可超过1千元。 然而,公积金局的答复仍引来网民非议,有者质疑当局公开会员的财务私隐是否妥当?再者,这名司机质问的重点是,为何保健储蓄已有钱还要填补,否则将无法更新私召车执照? 事缘上月24日,名为克里福德(Clifford Theseira)的72岁私召车司机申诉,自己的公积金储蓄只能每月领入息575新元,由于不足以承担夫妻俩生活费用,自己只好开私召车营生,不过上了年纪又不能开太久,实则收入有限。 他提到自己的保健储蓄(medisave)户头还有6万元,可是仍被要求要填补保健储蓄保费,而来自公积金局的信函也提到,若不填补将无法更新私召车司机执照。 “(保健储蓄)里我有6万元,如果我在这笔钱动用前离世,我的钱会怎样?我自己的钱为何我不能用。 如果我的执照吊销了,我能不能申领福利?哎呀,这里是新加坡,是没有免费的。” 公积金局公开克里福德公积金个资 对此,公积金局在昨日的脸书贴文声称克里福德“未反映事实的全部”,指他在55岁那年已领出14万元,如果当初没这么做,如今他每月领入息能超过千元。 “再者,克里福德还联名拥有一座已还清的五房式组屋”。 公积金局称当事人可以透过财路(GIRO)分期填补自己的保健储蓄户头,每月缴付额估计不超过月入的1巴仙。“只要他和其他雇员一样缴交,他仍能在明年7月到期前更新执照。” 公积金局更扬言,克里福德作为建国一代,已经从政府度援助措施受惠。仅在今年就已收到保健储蓄补贴和终身健保的特别保费津贴,也获取超过2300元包括现金和公积金在内的就业入息补助。…

全国5万公共租屋 半数租户住超过10年

根据我国建屋发展局数据,我国有总数5万7819个公共租赁组屋单位,其中有半数租屋者已住了10年以上。 建屋局发布的2016/2017年度统计显示,有四分之一租屋者,在现有单位住少过五年。《海峡时报》引述建屋局数据,现有租屋者平均年龄43岁,而单身人士近四成,他们是单身联合住房计划申请者,或同住家人已过世。 去年,有4336人向该局提交租屋申请,而获批准为3千799人。在过去五年,有3千租屋居民,成功购得自己的组屋。 与总数约为95万座的出售式组屋相比,出租组屋单位占比仅为6巴仙。但是,新加坡国立大学社会学系陈恩赐副教授称,长期住在租赁组屋,可意味着根深蒂固的贫困问题没有解决。也有其他因素,例如财务状况、家庭问题等,促使居民继续租屋。 在政府租赁组屋计划下,提供无法负担拥屋的家庭租屋。家庭月入少于1千500元,即可申请租用。取决于单位大小,及申请者是否享有房屋津贴,月租从最低26元至275元不等。 这意味着,这半数仍未拥有“自己”房子的租户,可能来自中低收入群体。思及他们当中可能还有家庭子女,说明他们可能同时面对低收入瓶颈,以及生活成本高涨的压力。 已故资政李光耀曾坦言,政府从未想过要把组屋出租给人们,而是鼓励大多数人民自掏腰包买屋,以期实现居者有其屋,避免人民过于依赖政府长期津贴。

Busker at woodlands MRT purportedly harassed by SMRT staff

Yesterday, TOC shared on our facebook about a post by Ms Zarina…

Babies born this year and last year to receive gifts from the government

The People’s Association (PA) has awarded the contract to Noel Gifts International…