Young man riding an electric scooter in Singapore with an amazing view on the city from Shutterstock.com

Starting today (5 November), electric scooters will be banned from footpaths in Singapore, and those found guilty of the crime can be fined up to S$2,000 and jail time of up to three months once the ban is strictly enforced from 2020.
The Land Transport Authority (LTA) said in a statement that despite “significant efforts” to regulate the use of such personal mobility devices (PMDs) using laws and to educate the public in using such devices responsibly, “offences relating to errant behaviour and incidents involving e-scooters remained on an upward trend”.
Although e-scooters are banned from being used on roads in the Republic, but it will still be allowed on cycling paths and Park Connector Networks (PCNs).
From now till 31 December 2019, there will be an advisory period where offenders will be given warnings, in order to give time for e-scooter riders to adjust to the changes.
“From 1 January 2020, a zero-tolerance approach will be taken and those caught riding an e-scooter on footpaths will face regulatory action. Offenders are liable for fines up to S$2,000 and/or face imprisonment of up to 3 months, if convicted,” LTA warned.
However, bicycles and Personal Mobility Aids (PMAs) like motorised wheelchairs will not be subjected to the footpaths ban, and will also be allowed on all cycling paths and PCNs.
Touching on allowing e-scooter users to continue making use of cycling paths and PCNs across Singapore, LTA said that it intends to “triple” the current distance of cycling paths from 440km by 2030, adding that all HDB towns will have a cycling path by that year.
“Several cycling path projects are nearing completion in major towns. From next year, residents in Ang Mo Kio, Bishan, Bukit Panjang, Taman Jurong and Tampines can enjoy greater active mobility connectivity as sections of cycling paths in these neighbourhoods will be completed.
If that’s not all, LTA also stated that it will be extending the Early Disposal Incentive for registered non-UL2272 certified e-scooters by one month to 31 December this year, and will also be providing more disposal points in December.
“Since the introduction of the S$100 early disposal incentive in September, LTA has received more than 9,000 applications from owners to dispose of their registered non-UL2272 certified e-scooters,” said LTA.
It added, “It is an offence to ride unregistered or non-compliant e-scooters on public paths. We strongly urge the owners of non-compliant e-scooters to dispose their devices early to protect themselves and their neighbours from unnecessary fire risks.”
LTA, in compliance with a safety directive issued by the Minister for Transport, will also “reject all existing licence applications and will not be inviting applications for PMD sharing licences until further notice”.
Following the announcement of the ban, online users gave mixed reactions over the decision. Penning their opinions on the Facebook pages of The Straits Times, Channel NewsAsia and TODAY, a large number of them applauded the Government’s move to disallow e-scooters on footpaths. They said that it’s “good riddance” to ban PMDs on footpaths as “elderly and children can finally feel safe to walk on pedestrian footpaths”.

Others said that the ban is unfortunate for PMD retailers and responsible riders as they have to now face the consequences due to the “acts of black sheep”. They added that those who use PMDs for livelihood will also have to suffer, even though they’re not at fault. Ken Chew said that this ban is “totally unfair” and the Authority should “ban those black sheep by a demerits point system”.

 

A number of online users felt sorry for parents and food delivery riders as they will now be badly affected due to the ban. They said that food delivery companies will be “nearly gone except for those that are using vehicles and motorbikes”.
Shewin Pillay pointed out that the general public will also suffer as we might not get our food delivered to us after this. “Ou(r) waits will be longer because the poor soul will be on his bicycle instead of his PMD. Or even worse, we won’t be able to get a rider and our order not fulfilled,” he wrote.
 


Some highlighted that the Government is “irresponsible” as they shouldn’t have allowed the use of PMDs in the first place since Singapore did not have the infrastructures to handle the devices. Leonie R Tan said the ban shows the “short cut and laziness of this government. Instead of choosing licensing, certification and education which takes more effort, they choose just outright ban”.


 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

为中国女子延长准证换性服务 移民局前官员被控

以性服务为条件,为三名中国籍女子延长特别准证,移民与关卡局前职员陈鹏山(译音)对多项贪污、泄漏官方机密,以及妨碍司法公正等至少10控状认罪。 51岁的陈鹏山获两名女子提供免费性服务,他则为女子通风报信以避开移民局突检。 他自1998年就在移民局服务,其职责包括逮捕非法移民。 在2016年至2017年期间,他遇到三名中国籍女子:王成红、朱世蓉和唐媛媛(名字全译音),他们因抵触移民条例被捕。 陈鹏山则告诉他们,本身有延长特殊准证的权限,可以协助他们继续留在新加坡。在去年,陈鹏山找朱世蓉按摩,两人也发生性关系,较后朱拒绝收费。 陈鹏山也联系上王成红,在他位于芽笼的住所享用性服务,后者也拒绝收费。一个月后陈鹏山在来访,也没有为性服务付费。 陈鹏山清楚知道这些性服务是免费的,因为他有能力为这三名女子获得特殊通行证。 他在去年二月和三月,把包括日期和地点等机密突检消息透露给三人,使他们得以避开突检。 不过,朱世蓉在去年三月31日被捕,其手机也被执法当局截获,结果陈鹏山通风报信的信息就此曝光。 当移民局就此事找陈鹏山问话后,他马上告知王成红删除两人通话信息。不过,后来陈鹏山目前已被解职,预料他将在明年2日被判刑。  

首以副总理身份发表劳动节集会演说 王瑞杰称行动党不抛弃工友

全国职工总会劳动节集会在昨日(5月1日)举行,财政部长王瑞杰,也首次以副总理身份,首度在该集会上发表主旨演说。 他再次重申职工运动一直都是人民行动党最重要的伙伴,全国职工总会和行动党的亲密共生关系,是新加坡独特而宝贵的劳资政三方合作关系的基础。 “今天是我首次以行动党下一代领导班子领军人物身份,对大家发言。”他如是告诉现场群众。 称不会抛弃工友 他也和历任总理一样,重申了建国总理李光耀50年前在职总现代化研讨会上做出的承诺,保证行动党和职总的亲密共生关系,将会在第四代领导层以及往后继续下去。” 王瑞杰称行动党珍视和职总关系,并向工运承诺,行动党永远都不会抛弃工友。 同时,第四代领导班子会全心全意帮助年长工人继续就业。 话虽如此,摆在国内劳动者眼前的则是艰巨的挑战和竞争。过去,王瑞杰曾在南洋理工大学的一项活动, 呼吁国人应抱持信心和全球各地不同族群、言语和文化的人交流,并指出“大家不会想活在一个人人筑墙自保的世界。” 国内PMET的困境 他认为,我们必须加深对他人的理解,无论对方是新移民、我们的邻居、大学同侪、还是其他大学的学生,也鼓励学生参与大学间的交换学生计划。 其中一位与会学生,也对王瑞杰抛出问题,询问他对于放眼我国到2030年引进690万人口的立场。但他指出,我国的人口还不算过于稠密,还有其他都市比我国更拥挤,他也引述“城市规划之父”刘太格在2014年的提议,新加坡要保持长远永续成长,就应以人口达到一千万的情况作规划。 然而,政府大开闸招揽外来人才定居我国,本土PMET(专业人士、经理、执行人员和技师)却面对越来越难找到工作的困境。…

MP De Souza announces setting up site to house migrant workers as part of Ulu Pandan’s contribution to fight COVID-19

Holland-Bukit Timah GRC MP Christopher de Souza posted a Facebook note on…

火锅店标新宣传兔子料理 二协会请愿抗议

火锅店标新立异推出兔肉菜色,在脸书网页帖文打广告,遭到爱护动物者狠批攻击,甚至发起网上请愿联署,目前已取得超过7500人的支持,而火锅店也已经撤下有关的宣传帖文。 同心如意传统铜火锅餐厅于七年前在我国开张后,推出多种火锅料理。上周该餐厅推出了两道兔肉菜肴,分别为红油兔丁以及兔肉火锅,并以“新加坡唯一提供兔肉餐厅”的噱头,在脸书专页上帖文,希望吸引顾客光临。 有关帖文很快引起网民的注意,毁誉不一,但是也引来了本地爱兔人士的强力攻击,声称食用宠物的行为与拯救地球被遗弃的兔子理念背道而驰。 基于反对将兔子这可爱的宠物变成菜肴,脸书专页Bunny Wonderland及家兔协会(House Rabbit Society Singapore)发起了网上请愿书签署活动,号召网民响应,要求餐馆撤下这两道菜肴。 该请愿书也提到,有网民表示适当地食用养殖的兔子,也是可以被接受的,然而也有网民表示此请愿书只针对一种肉类,有点“假慈悲”。 针对这些负面评语,发起者表示是他们只是针对一家餐厅,因为该餐厅在不习惯食用兔子的国家,积极宣传兔子菜肴。 “很感谢已经联署的网民支持,让他们达到了目的,提高知名度的同时也对该餐馆施加压力。” 截止目前为止,请愿书已经获得了超过7500人的签名,而该餐厅也配合请愿,在脸书上移除有关贴文,但是是否移除有关菜肴,就不得而知。…