On Monday (21 Oct), social activist Gilbert Goh posted a message on his Facebook page highlighting that a needy family residing at a 2-room rental flat in Ang Mo Kio had received a lawyer’s letter of demand for $180.20.
On the letter, it read:

“Shocked to see this needy family received a town council bill attached with a letter of demand from a legal office for quite a small sum owed – $122,” Mr Goh commented.
The sum is stated to be the total S&CC owing from May 2018 to Sept 2019.
According to Mr Goh, the family is in a dire state as the main breadwinner has contracted cancer and the medical costs have “plunged the family into [a] financial crisis”. He added, “He has since resigned to his illness without seeking for any medical treatment due to high transportation cost than anything else.”
Mr Goh felt that the additional $32 as a late payment fee and another $25.70 for legal charges out of the total payable fee of $180.20 were excessive, in view of the financial status of the family. He said, “These two fees constitute almost 30% of the whole bill – something which weighs heavily on the poor family and probably swamped with many other monthly bills as well.”
He also shared that he has seen some poor families being charged in court for defaulting on their bills, resulting in them having to pay an additional $500 for the court appearance fee, compounding their problem.
“We have seen some poor families facing jail sentences when they appear in court and the hard bitter fact is that the S&CC bill still need to be paid after the sentencing is served,” he added.
In any case, Mr Goh revealed that a good Samaritan has come forward to pay the $180.20 bill after Mr Goh interceded for the family and that all is well – for now.
“But all this goes to show that it’s tough to be poor in Singapore,” Mr Goh lamented.
The letter of demand, was signed off by lawyer T U Naidu who was formerly the Chairman of the Citizen Consultative Committee (CCC) of Eunos and was awarded a Public Service Medal in 2004 for his excellent grassroots work.
Town Councils have to negotiate and engage with residents before charging them for bad debts
As of April 2018, the State Courts placed in measures to direct town councils to negotiate and engage with the residents who owe S&CC before starting criminal proceedings against them as a last resort.
This is in light of the fact that the number of residents who were hauled to court under the Town Councils Act, has more than doubled between 2015 to 2017 and non-payment of S&CC accounted for over 90 per cent of all town council cases filed in the State Courts in 2017.
It is required to issue at least two notices to a resident who does not pay S&CC, before issuing a statutory demand.
It has been said that these protocols will give town councils a “consistent system” of managing these issues, and they will help identify residents who have genuine difficulties in paying S&CC or composition amounts. The town councils can then step in to help or adapt the penalty measures to the residents’ circumstances.
Marine Parade Town Council chairman Lim Biow Chuan who was quoted in a Today report, said that it takes much “time and manpower resources” to serve three reminder letters and to get property managers to visit residents’ homes to better understand the issue.
Adding that while taking residents to court is only done when there is “no choice”, ultimately, the town council still has “an obligation” to collect the charges for a common pooled fund that is used for estate maintenance.
Mr Lim said: “We can’t have people who don’t pay and (we) do nothing… Just like a management corporation, we owe it as a duty to other people who are paying”.
All the town councils engaged by the State Courts had indicated that they are agreeable to the imposed initiatives. TODAY reported that other than going down the legal route, town councils let needy residents pay off the outstanding amount in instalments, or rope them in to do simple part-time work, including looking out for areas that need to be cleaned or checking for defective items in common areas such as lightbulbs that need to be changed.
In this case involving Ang Mo Kio town council which is headed by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, the town council seems to have chosen the easy way out of suing the family to pay.

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Education Minister Lawrence Wong says there’s a “big gap” between textbook learning and the real world

The newly-appointed Education Minister Lawrence Wong said on Wednesday (29 July) that…

TOC Exclusive: Widjaja family visit Prof Chan’s condo

Family hopes to find out more details of alleged stabbing and son’s death.

【选举】即时:李显龙已建议总统解散国会

我国总理李显龙,于今日(6月23日)下午4时发表全国广播。他指已会见总统哈莉玛,并建议申请解散国会,颁布选举令。 他在广播中解释为何目前需需要解散国会,也指现任政府五年任期已结束。 根据今年三月份选区范围检讨委会报告,国会议席从原有的89增至93席,共31个选区,其中集选区17个,单选区14个。 早前选举局也指出,依循卫生部指南,来届选举将无法举办群众大会,而改以线上群众大会。同时,政党拜访一组人不得超过五人,各组人员也不得接触,需遵守一米安全距离。

投资负巨债海南航空 分析师:淡马锡估值过高

据报导,海南航空在上周日(10日)售出其在上海上市股权的20巴仙,筹集得70亿人民币(14.58亿)的资金。该股权将售予不超过10家投资者,其中为淡马锡富敦投资有限公司(Temasek Fullerton Alpha),即淡马锡控股旗下的全资子公司。 作为中国国内第四大航空公司,基于“主要产业重组”和母公司海航集团的负债累累,而自今年1月停牌。 海航集团自2015年以来砸资500亿,疯狂扫购涵括管理至酒店等多领域产业,庞大债务加上已引起监管单位注意,迫使海航集团在今年首4个月,就脱手掉价值140亿美元的资产。 这些售出股权所得,却用来添购或维修飞机,不过分析师Corrine Png则关注更深切问题。 曾于2008年至2016年在摩根大通(JP Morgan)亚太交通研究担任总监的Corrine Png相信,海南航空有很大可能需要购入母公司海航集团的旅游产业,来协助减缓后者的债务。她补充,取决于并购价格,但这肯定会成为海南航空的负担。 彭博专栏:新国企业高估并购 彭博社专栏作者大卫弗京(David…