Young people ride on an electric scooter along the waterfront Marina Bay in Singapore. Quay Marina Bay. (Image by DoublePhoto Studio / Shutterstock.com)

While we’ve noticed an increase in personal mobility device (PMD) related accidents recently with unsuspecting pedestrians being injured, some fatally, from collisions, Tan Tock Seng Hospital (TTSH) said on Monday that PMD users themselves are not getting away unscathed.
The number of PMD riders being injured was also on the rise, said the hospital, noting that there was an increase of 68% in PMD-related accidents at the hospital in the last two years and nine months.
The hospital said at a briefing that 213 PMD riders were treated between January 2017 and September 2019 for PMD accidents, along with six patients who were pedestrians involved in similar incidents. Of the 213 cases, 6 patients died.
The hospital noted that 53% of them were aged 20 to 39, 29% were between 40 and 59, while 9% were above 60. More than 75% of the PMD riders treated were male.
It was also highlighted that numbers are increasing. The first nine months of 2019 saw 79 PMD riders admitted to TTSH compared to 87 cases for the whole of 2018. In 2017, TTSH had 47 patients for PMD related cases.
According to the data from TTSH, the most common injuries were to the head and neck followed by external lacerations and abrasions. There were also chest injuries which made up 9% of cases as well as injuries to the extremities such as sprains, fractures and amputations which made by 8%.
Using the Injury Severity Score to measure the severity of each patient’s injuries, it was found that 46 patients had moderate to severe injuries. 26 of them had self-skidded, nine were in collisions with other vehicles, five crashed into stationary objects, and three clashed with other PMDs. Of those 46 cases, only seven were wearing helmets.
The hospital said that about 167 patients suffered minor injuries, adding that it has no available information on the cause of injury in most of those cases.
Dr Teo Li Tserng, director of the trauma services unit at TTSH said: “A lot of patients have head injuries, the unfortunate thing about (such) injuries is that recovery time can vary. If you have a severe head injury, you might end up in a vegetative state for the rest of your life.”
Dr Teo called for more awareness on the importance of safety gear for PMD riders, adding that the recent spike in PMD-related accidents makes it a timely moment to share the information.

Possible ban on PMDs?

With the increase in PMD-related accidents – especially the most recent death of 65-year-old cyclist Mdm Ong Bee Eng who died following a crash with a PMD rider – there has been plenty of talk around the dangers that PMDs pose to others on the street with the public calling for stricter regulation and safety measures.
Earlier this month, Senior Minister for Transport Dr Janil Puthucheary said in Parliament on 7 October that a ban on PMDs would be considered if the behaviour of PMD users did not improve.
“Meanwhile, we have to make a decision on where to allow PMDs to be used, other than on dedicated paths for PMDs and bicycles – on footpaths, or on roads, or not at all until the town is ready,” he explained, emphasising that these are “difficult choices” which requires re-examination.
He continued, “In the meantime, we strongly urge PMD users to be extra responsible and mindful of others. If their behaviour does not improve, we may have no choice but to ban their usage completely from Singapore. This would be a loss.”
In an interview with CNA938 a few days later, Dr Janil said, “We don’t particularly think a ban is what we need to do right now, but it’s part of our consideration and it’s something that we have as a tool if it becomes necessary.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

国会的角色 既是辩论最可行方案

盛港候任议员林志蔚直言,国会的角色就是去辩论最可行的政策方案。“理想情况下,国会议员选择支持或反对某政策,将选区选民和全国的利益作整体考量。” 政策依据整体的优劣,固然“魔鬼藏在细节里”,制定政策者某种程度上该去盘点这些细节,但也要充分理解较广泛的考量因素,如对预算财案的潜在影响、整体社会经济的影响等。 林志蔚曾在世界银行工作七年,也曾参与不同经济体(不管是民主或较不民主政体)的政策制定,对于民主政策决策有感而发,在脸书表达个人看法。 拥有美国哈佛大学历史学硕士、美国加利福尼亚大学圣克鲁兹分校国际经济学、哲学博士资历,目前也是ESSEC商学院经济学副教授。 林志蔚也在近期获委新加坡经济学会公布最新理事会成员。坊间期许更多在野党议员入国会, 能激起更诚挚的辩论,但如果国会没有足够的在野党声音,这样的辩论根本不会出现。 他指出,由大多数人(或大多数代议士)制定的决策(不论好坏)都会在全民之间落实,在此前必然需经过一番辩论,但若通过成为法律,全民只能遵守。而如果法律仅是针对特定群体,亦是缺乏民主和歧视性的,当然针对性的法律,例如妇女产假、最低薪金制等则属例外。 不过决策者需谨慎非自愿排斥或包容的风险,带来偏驳或差别待遇的看法,有别于原子或化学,若人们知道政策怎么对待他们,人是会改变他们的态度的。 国会的角色,正是去辩论最可行的方案;较精细的细节可以交给有能力且非政治性的官僚,将笼统的转化为更具体和实用的事物。在好些民主政体,通常都是公共体系的高层随着换政府更迭。 林志蔚也提醒,评估的黄金标准固然是做实验,但是要这么去对国家政策做实验显然不切实际,那就反倒把人们都当成白老鼠了。所幸统计科学之进步,使得人们可以用较不侵害权益的方式来进行评估。 “现代化的公共服务,理应有擅长此法的专业人士服务。理想上还应进行独立的评鉴(例如学术机构),而这亦需要出于公共利益的数据共享。” 那么政策有没有效的评估,就反映给国会,来决定有关政策是否还值得进行下去,或哪些部分可能失败。

NDP 2020 fireworks will be launched at 10 locations islandwide

On Singapore’s 55th National Day this Sunday (9 Aug), fireworks will be…

Singapore Red Cross to donate S$50,000 to communities affected by Beirut explosions

In the wake of the devastation caused by explosions in Lebanon’s capital…

Governments state number of Zika-infected citizens in Singapore

The Ministry of Health (MOH) in its press release on Wednesday (31…