Connect with us

Current Affairs

毕业证书遭校方扣下 马国马大生恫言法律对付

Published

on

马来亚大学土木工程系生兼马大新青年前主席黄彦铬在毕业典礼上举字报要求副校长阿都拉欣下台,引起校方不满报警对付,并且扣下他的成绩单和毕业证书。其代表律师要求校方在24小时内给出毕业证书和成绩单,否则将会采取法律行动对付。

黄彦铬昨日傍晚(10月16日)自八打灵再也警察局出来后,在代表律师阿西阿里的陪同下,举办新闻发布会。

阿西阿里指出,他们在录口供期间都和警方保持良好合作,所以在进行约一小时的录供后就可以离开。

黄彦铬并没做出侮辱行为

他表示,据警方透露已经接获十个针对黄彦铬的投报,因此警方依据刑事法典第504条文,即故意侮辱他人、蓄意破坏安宁条文来展开调查。

但是,阿西阿里强烈反对有关的指控,并表示他的客户只是做出批评,并没有任何人身攻击或用词粗俗来侮辱人。

“他只是为了强调自己的立场,并没有任何具有侮辱性的字眼,因此不应该如此被对待。”

阿西阿里也指出,黄彦铬昨日中午到大学归还毕业袍,欲领取毕业证书和成绩单时,大学办公室秘书处指黄彦铬的成绩单在打印时弄脏了,还没有准备新的交给他。

这令黄彦铬质疑大学有意扣下他的毕业证和成绩单。

“当我请他们展示被弄脏的成绩单时,对方无法拿出来。当我问他们是否要扣下我的成绩单时,他们都表示不清楚。”

强调校方无权不给出证件

针对此事,阿西阿里强调,世界上没有任何大学能够在学生,一没有被证实犯罪、二没涉及任何丑闻的情况下,拒绝颁发大学毕业证书和成绩单给学生。

“我希望校方能够尽快回复……希望校方在24小时内交出成绩单和毕业证书,否则我们或许会采取法律途径对付。”

他补充说,在大学的官方网站上也有注明,只要学生还回毕业袍,就能够领取毕业证书和成绩单,而且若有需要,马来西亚公民和外籍学生分别需要缴交50令吉和300令吉,就能够让校方重新打印成绩单和毕业证。

指责副校长只想当一名政客

针对记者询问为什么不在其他地方做出抗议行动时,黄彦铬则质问校方是否有提供更好的沟通平台。“我担任新青年主席时,曾多次投诉和请愿书到校长室,但是都没有获得任何回应……哪里是对的地点、对的平台?副校长都没有听到学生的声音。”

他表示抗议行动只为了让学校更民主化,但是副校长显然利用大学名声来实现个人的政治议程。

他也指责副校长并没有认真执行职责,只是想做一名政客。“你是否看过有一名校长因为学生行为报警吗?全世界都没有。”

他认为副校长报警的举动,主要是为了杀鸡儆猴,制造“白色恐怖”氛围,以压制其他的反对声音,“这是一种肮脏手段”。

黄彦铬强调自己没有任何政治背景,外界也不能仅凭一张他和其他政客的合照,就判断他是某政党的“打手”,甚至说他的抗议行动含有政治因素。

虽然时至目前已经接近24小时,但是至截稿为止,仍然没有接获任何更新咨询。

马哈迪:政坛不插手

针对此事,各领域都有代表发言。

吉隆坡总警长拿督斯里马兹兰表示,警方绝不容许法律被任何人轻视,若有发现必将采取行动。

马来西亚首相敦马哈迪医生则认为,每个人都有发言权,包括学生,但是要看场合。他表示政党不会插手此事,一切交由警方处理。

网上发布二请愿书

然而在网上,就有两个联署请愿活动在进行。

其中一个联署请愿书是针对在马来人尊严大会上发言的人士,即马大、苏丹依德里斯教育大学(UPSI)、玛拉工艺大学(UITM)以及马来西亚博特拉大学(UPM)的副校长,要求他们下台。

有关请愿书由Naga Kavin Amuthan发起,并将交予教育部。

发起者表示,上述人士在马来人尊严大会中的发言带有种族主义色彩,企图煽动国民的种族歧视,且有破坏各族互相信任的和谐生活。然而他们都位居教育界的高位,实在令人不安,因此促请他们离职下台。

另一个网上联署请愿书则是针对黄彦铬的行为,认为马大不应该发出毕业证书和成绩单给后者,由马来亚大学大学生发动者所发起。

发起者认为黄彦铬的行为已经不尊重毕业场合,且大字报上所写下的字眼更是马大的耻辱,因此没有资格获得大学毕业证和学位。“保持不同立场的双方可以针对课题进行理性讨论,但是学生所赋予的自由权利,并不代表能够随心所欲地做事。”

他也要求黄彦铬做出公开道歉等诉求。

目前针对各大学副校长的请愿书获得了将近5000个签名,但是针对黄彦铬的请愿书则获得了将近一万人的签名。

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

TJC issued 3rd POFMA order under Minister K Shanmugam for alleged falsehoods

The Transformative Justice Collective (TJC) was issued its third POFMA correction order on 5 October 2024 under the direction of Minister K Shanmugam for alleged falsehoods about death penalty processes. TJC has rejected the government’s claims, describing POFMA as a tool to suppress dissent.

Published

on

The Transformative Justice Collective (TJC), an advocacy group opposed to the death penalty, was issued its third Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA) correction direction on 5 October 2024.

The correction was ordered by Minister for Home Affairs and Law, K Shanmugam, following TJC’s publication of what the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) alleges to be false information regarding Singapore’s death row procedures and the prosecution of drug trafficking cases.

These statements were made on TJC’s website and across its social media platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and X (formerly Twitter).

In addition to TJC, civil activist Kokila Annamalai was also issued a correction direction by the minister over posts she made on Facebook and X between 4 and 5 October 2024.

According to MHA, these posts echoed similar views on the death penalty and the legal procedures for drug-related offences, and contained statements that the ministry claims are false concerning the treatment of death row prisoners and the state’s legal responsibilities in drug trafficking cases.

MHA stated that the posts suggested the government schedules and stays executions arbitrarily, without due regard to legal processes, and that the state does not bear the burden of proving drug trafficking charges.

However, these alleged falsehoods are contested by MHA, which maintains that the government strictly follows legal procedures, scheduling executions only after all legal avenues have been exhausted, and that the state always carries the burden of proof in such cases.

In its official release, MHA emphasised, “The prosecution always bears the legal burden of proving its case beyond a reasonable doubt, and this applies to all criminal offences, including drug trafficking.”

It also pointed to an article on the government fact-checking site Factually to provide further clarification on the issues raised.

As a result of these allegations, both TJC and Annamalai are now required to post correction notices. TJC must display these corrections on its website and social media platforms, while Annamalai is required to carry similar notices on her Facebook and X posts.

TikTok has also been issued a targeted correction direction, requiring the platform to communicate the correction to all Singapore-based users who viewed the related TJC post.

In a statement following the issuance of the correction direction, TJC strongly rejected the government’s claims. The group criticised the POFMA law, calling it a “political weapon used to crush dissent,” and argued that the order was more about the exercise of state power than the pursuit of truth. “We have put up the Correction Directions not because we accept any of what the government asserts, but because of the grossly unjust terms of the POFMA law,” TJC stated.

TJC further argued that the government’s control over Singapore’s media landscape enables it to push pro-death penalty views without opposition. The group also stated that it would not engage in prolonged legal battles over the POFMA correction orders, opting to focus on its abolitionist work instead.

This marks the third time TJC has been subject to a POFMA correction direction in recent months.

The group was previously issued two orders in August 2024 for making similar statements concerning death row prisoners.

In its latest statement, MHA noted that despite being corrected previously, TJC had repeated what the ministry views as falsehoods.

MHA also criticised TJC for presenting the perspective of a convicted drug trafficker without acknowledging the harm caused to victims of drug abuse.

Annamalai, a prominent civil rights activist, is also known for her involvement in various social justice campaigns. She was charged in June 2024 for her participation in a pro-Palestinian procession near the Istana. Her posts, now subject to correction, contained information similar to those presented by TJC regarding death penalty procedures and drug-related cases.

POFMA, which was introduced in 2019, allows the government to issue correction directions when it deems falsehoods are being spread online.

Critics of the law argue that it can be used to suppress dissent, while the government asserts that it is a necessary tool for combating misinformation. The law has been frequently invoked against opposition politicians and activists.

As of October 2024, Minister K Shanmugam has issued 17 POFMA directions, more than any other minister. Shanmugam, who was instrumental in introducing POFMA, is followed by National Development Minister Desmond Lee, who has issued 10 POFMA directions.

Major media outlets, including The Straits Times, Channel News Asia, and Mothership, have covered the POFMA directions. However, as of the time of writing, none have included TJC’s response rejecting the government’s allegations.

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Hotel Properties Limited suspends trading ahead of Ong Beng Seng’s court hearing

Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has halted trading ahead of his court appearance today (4 October). The announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at about 7.45am, citing a pending release of an announcement. Mr Ong faces one charge of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts and another charge of obstruction of justice. He is due in court at 2.30pm.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), the property and hotel developer co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has requested a trading halt ahead of the Singapore tycoon’s scheduled court appearance today (4 October) afternoon.

This announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at approximately 7.45am, stating that the halt was due to a pending release of an announcement.

Mr Ong, who serves as HPL’s managing director and controlling shareholder, faces one charge under Section 165, accused of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts, as well as one charge of obstruction of justice.

He is set to appear in court at 2.30pm on 4 October.

Ong’s charges stem from his involvement in a high-profile corruption case linked to former Singaporean transport minister S Iswaran.

The 80-year-old businessman was named in Iswaran’s initial graft charges earlier this year.

These charges alleged that Iswaran had corruptly received valuable gifts from Ong, including tickets to the 2022 Singapore Formula 1 Grand Prix, flights, and a hotel stay in Doha.

These gifts were allegedly provided to advance Ong’s business interests, particularly in securing contracts with the Singapore Tourism Board for the Singapore GP and the ABBA Voyage virtual concert.

Although Iswaran no longer faces the original corruption charges, the prosecution amended them to lesser charges under Section 165.

Iswaran pleaded guilty on 24 September, 2024, to four counts under this section, which covered over S$400,000 worth of gifts, including flight tickets, sports event access, and luxury items like whisky and wines.

Additionally, he faced one count of obstructing justice for repaying Ong for a Doha-Singapore flight shortly before the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) became involved.

On 3 October, Iswaran was sentenced to one year in jail by presiding judge Justice Vincent Hoong.

The prosecution had sought a sentence of six to seven months for all charges, while the defence had asked for a significantly reduced sentence of no more than eight weeks.

Ong, a Malaysian national based in Singapore, was arrested by CPIB in July 2023 and released on bail shortly thereafter. Although no charges were initially filed against him, Ong’s involvement in the case intensified following Iswaran’s guilty plea.

The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) had earlier indicated that it would soon make a decision regarding Ong’s legal standing, which has now led to the current charges.

According to the statement of facts read during Iswaran’s conviction, Ong’s case came to light as part of a broader investigation into his associates, which revealed Iswaran’s use of Ong’s private jet for a flight from Singapore to Doha in December 2022.

CPIB investigators uncovered the flight manifest and seized the document.

Upon learning that the flight records had been obtained, Ong contacted Iswaran, advising him to arrange for Singapore GP to bill him for the flight.

Iswaran subsequently paid Singapore GP S$5,700 for the Doha-Singapore business class flight in May 2023, forming the basis of his obstruction of justice charge.

Mr Ong is recognised as the figure who brought Formula One to Singapore in 2008, marking the first night race in the sport’s history.

He holds the rights to the Singapore Grand Prix. Iswaran was the chairman of the F1 steering committee and acted as the chief negotiator with Singapore GP on business matters concerning the race.

 

Continue Reading

Trending