TOC Editor Terry Xu submitted a letter to the Straits Times Forum in response to another letter published on the forum on 29 September 2019, written by Ms Chng Huiling. However, ST seems to have passed on publishing Terry’s response.
In her letter (TOC must clarify its intentions, 29 September), Ms Chng had said that it was “disturbing” that TOC’s criticising Singapore were “masqueraded as pieces written by Singaporeans when in fact the writers were foreigners”.
She also questioned why Terry would allow foreigners to write negative articles about Singapore and pass them off as being written by Singaporeans. She wondered if TOC would, from now on, openly declare when articles are written by foreigners and if TOC can assure its readers that it will not “lie” about its writers’ backgrounds again.
Intending to respond to Ms Chng’s questions, Terry said in the letter he submitted to ST that Ms Chng’s allegations are categorically untrue and baseless.
He added, “If one were to look at the internet records of TOC’s description, one will note that we have declared upfront since 2017 that while we had been supported by local volunteers over the decade but we have since made a few changes to ensure the sustainability of our operations.”
He also explained that when asked by a member of the public earlier this year about the staffing of TOC, he ”did not shy away from confessing that TOC does hire foreign staff due to lack of resources”.
“Therefore, Ms Chng’s comments about TOC and myself have caused unfair damage to TOC’s reputation,” he asserted.
Earlier on, this letter by Ms Chng was removed by ST after Terry had sent a letter of demand to the editors of Singapore Press Holdings (SPH) on 30 September demanding that they take it down. They did.
Terry said in a Facebook post later explaining his letter of demand, “There has been a lot of insinuations made about The Online Citizen recently and this has caused members of the public to hold untrue views of the site.”

“I do not fault the writer for having the views that she had but ST should have known better than to publish a letter that contains falsehoods especially when it refers to itself as the best antibiotics to “fake news”.”
However, following Terry’s post on Facebook, SPH wrote to him saying that the remarks he made on the post were “unfair and uncalled for” and that it has damaged the site’s reputation as a trusted media organisation.
It noted that the original letter was removed out of goodwill and without any admission of liability. Now, however, it has taken legal advice and reposted the original letter on 2 October.
After that, Terry submitted a letter on 3 October in response to Ms Chng’s original forum letter but appears that ST has chosen not to publish Terry’s response.

Terry did not hide anything when asked

On 17 May, a story was published on Singapotato in which the author talked about TOC staff. Specifically, the author highlighted a post by someone on Facebook (15 May) in which they asked Terry why many of TOC’s Facebook page managers were not in Singapore and why foreigners are hired to write for the site.
Terry replied, “Why not? It is cheaper. 20 managers if you pay them 2000 a month, that’s S$40,000 a month. TOC only has an income of 5k a month. You tell me how to balance it off if all the TOC fanpage managers are paid SG rates.”
Terry went on to clarify that some reporters in Singapore have asked for a salary of S$4,000 a month, something the site simply cannot afford to pay. He also noted that the Singapore government cannot intimidate foreign TOC staff.
When asked about what these foreign talents do, Terry simply said, “What you see on the site is what the team produces.”
While the article by Singapotato goes on to question if Terry is hiding anything in terms of foreign talent and funding, Terry has continued to assert TOC’s independence.
Update 18.10.2019, 9.25AM: Straits Time responded to say they have published Terry’s letter on the ST Forum this morning, around 7AM. The letter is titled ‘Forum: TOC has been upfront about operations‘.  The forum editor responded in the email to Terry, stating “We were planning to publish your letter to let you have your response to the forum writer, as is our usual practice.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Confucius said family harmony important to society

It was reported that Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and Deputy Prime…

【工人党市镇会诉讼】高庭驳回诉方部分修改诉状内容申请

阿裕尼集选区议员毕丹星,在脸书更新有关阿裕尼-后港市镇会诉讼的情况,指出上周高庭已发布口头裁决,驳回了诉方部分修改和新增诉状内容的申请。 尽管高庭已在去年10月11日作出判决,不过阿裕尼后港市镇会(AHTC)代表律师,在今年5月向法庭申请,修改针对工人党毕丹星和其他四人的诉状内容。 针对第三至第五答辩方(即毕丹星、市镇会理事蔡誌泓和符策涫),诉方要求新增的诉状内容包括,指责他们涉嫌“在行使适当技术与审慎义务上失责”(breaches of a duty to exercise due skill and care)。…

“先隔离总干事,他才从中国回来!” 世卫泰国代表搞笑狠酸谭德塞引全场哄笑

武汉冠状病毒肆虐全球,世界卫生组织(WHO)总干事谭德塞多次发表争议性言论,引发批评,而近日一段卫生组织会议上,泰国代表的发言狠酸谭德塞,调侃谭德塞与中国防疫的表现,引发现场阵阵笑声。 世卫2月6日在泰国曼谷举行第146次执行委员会会议,原本严肃会议却因泰国代表苏威发挥狠酸功力,直指目前世卫组织反对落实旅游限制的建议已被忽略,若真要落实旅游禁令,那么总干事谭德塞应该最先被隔离,因为他刚去往北京,但如今又在现场开会。 他狂酸,“主席,你最危险,因为你一直坐在总干事旁边!我个人倒是很安全,因为过去这几天总干事都不跟我握手和拥抱。” 此话一出,会场内发出阵阵笑声,而坐在前方的印度代表,更是忍不住发笑。 此外,他还讽刺表示目前全球正失去信心,要想建立人民的信心,最好是在中国开会,尤其是武汉。 “主席,我建议我们WHO应到中国开会,尤其是到武汉,现在正是造访拥有两千年历史黄鹤楼的最好时机! 或是去北京也行,现在长城、紫禁城等旅游区都没有人,而且价格也便宜! ” 最后,他也表示,“我已征得我太太的同意,愿意捐出我半年的退休金,另外自掏腰包参与这个在中国举办的WHO会议,谢谢! ” 泰国代表的酸言酸语,令会场不断发出笑声,而坐在前方的印度代表更是时不时偷笑。 网友在看到视频后,纷纷笑说,“真的是有够酸“,”印度代表要忍笑到内伤了“,”被泰式酸辣笑翻了“,”跟泰国的广告一样,幽默而充满深度!…

M’sian PMET glad to come back to SG again to earn SGD after reopening of border

Limited cross-border travel between Singapore and Malaysia started last Monday (17 Aug).…