Jeffrey Ong Su Aun, lawyer and managing partner of law firm JLC Advisors who abscond with more S$33 million in funds from a client’s escrow account, was slapped with four more new charges on Monday (14 October).
He is charged with three more counts of forgery for the purpose of cheating and one count of criminal breach of trust (CBT), bringing his total number of charges to 26.
These charges is not part of the S$33.4 million that was allegedly paid out under Ong’s instructions from the account of engineering firm Allied Technologies. The firm was one of JLC Advisors’ clients.
On Monday, Ong, 42, is charged of CBT as an attorney by dishonestly misappropriating US$4.85 million (S$6.64 million) from JLC Advisors’ Standard Chartered bank account on 23 October 2017. This form of aggravated CBT can result to a life sentence, if convicted.
The Singaporean is also now accused of apparently forging statement of accounts for April, May and June 2018, on 7 August 2018 for the law firm’s Standard Chartered USD bank account.
Ong did it in order to cheat a man called Chan Yi Zhang into thinking that the US$4.85 million kept by JLC Advisors in escrow was present and unused the Standard Chartered bank account. The funds were meant for a settlement for two firms, Airtrust (Singapore) and Wrangwell.
Court documents did not reveal who Chan was.
As for the three new forgery charges, they are similar to the 13 forgery counts that Ong was charged on 20 June, and it involves a total sum of nearly US$4.8 million. These alleged offences, which also involved him making false statements of accounts, were done between October 2017 to February 2019.
Ong received the four new charges on Monday through video link, and the prosecution applied for a six-week adjournment in order to finish their investigations. Deputy Public Prosecutor Nicholas Khoo told the court that investigators are still working on taking statements from him and might bring more charges against Ong.
No plea was recorded on Monday, and the case is set for the next hearing on 25 November.

Previous case and arrest in Malaysia

After he appeared in court in June, it is revealed in court that Ong left Singapore on 13 May – 10 days before a 23 May Singapore Exchange filing by Allied Technology. This is the beginning of how the attention was first focused on Ong and JLC Advisors.
Ong was apprehended in a hotel in Kuala Lumpur, two weeks after absconding Singapore. It appeared that he used a stolen Malaysian passport, and got rid of his mobile phone and purchased a new phone with a Chinese SIM card before running away from Singapore.
Prosecutors also revealed that he got help from a friend to bring him to Malaysia and made arrangements to stay in an office and a hotel, which he didn’t pay for using credit cards.
He told his plans only to his wife, said an officer from the Commercial Affairs Department in his affidavit.
After he was repatriated and brought to court in Singapore on 1 June, Ong was first charged with cheating a company named Suite Development. He apparently did it by tricking another company (CCJ Investments) into believing that Suite Development had made a loan agreement with it.
Ong is blamed for signing a number of documents posing as the sole director and shareholder of Suite Development. He allegedly did it a few times on 18 February this year, and the amount involved in this deal is S$16 million.
Additionally, Ong is also said to dishonestly use CCJ Investments to disburse S$6 million. Nearly S$3.3 million was used to refinance the mortgage loan of Suite Development and about S$2.7 million was deposited into the client account of JLC Advisors, the court had previous noted.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

NEA to co-fund half of centralised dishwashing costs borne by stallholders at new SEHCs starting January next year

The National Environment Agency (NEA) has included the co-funding of centralised dishwashing…

海外承包商连年得标 总审计署:人协招标、采购存严重疏漏

2017/18年总审计署稽查报告出炉,在报告中总审计署揭发,人民协会和旗下其中一个基层组织,在两项总值50万元的招标,以及四项总值12万9400元的报价中,未遵循政府公开、公平、透明和物有所值的采购原则。同时,在管理海外采购有严重缺陷,支付过程可被滥用。 总审计署稽查人民协会15项总值168万元,与两项重大活动有关的公开招标—2016中秋嘉年华以及2017农历新年。 另外,也审查总值24万3400元,与2017年妆艺大游行有关的六项报价。 其中,有关基层组织在2016年中秋嘉年华(20万元)和2017农历新年(30万元)的街灯装饰公开招标,未遵守政府采购原则。同样的海外承包商,自2014年起就在相同活动彩灯装饰招标,连年得标。 承担承包商材料运输费、住宿 在2016年中秋嘉年华招标一事,该基层组织并未审核和对比竞标者,作出最佳比价。有关海外承包商在工程合约中附额外条件,要求该基层组织,承担运材料的交通开销、其员工在新工作时的住宿和提供场地安装灯笼。 总审计署质疑该基层组织在进行比价时,并未考量上述额外开销,也没有列入其招标评估建议和报告,使上级审批单位知情。 在2017年农历新年招标事项,上述海外承包商,也是唯一的竞标者和获得工程合约,在其提案中也附上了上述同样额外开销要求基层组织承担。这一次,基层组织还是没有把额外开销的问题,列入评估报告中让上级知道。 “即时2017年新年活动招标已截止,有关基层组织还是接受该承包商的竞标提案,还允许他修改内容和价格。” 对此,人民协会已像总审计署解释,有关采购失当,主要是该采购团队面临时间压力,也对政府采购原则缺乏了解。人民协会也承诺未来将提升属下职员遵守政府采购原则,并确保竞标、工程合约都有良好存档管理。 基于海外承包商提供的工程合约乃依循其国家法律,基层组织在签批合约前,应先咨询人民协会法律部门,避免合约内容无法保障人协的权益。 官员独自出国采购…

825荃葵青游行再酿冲突港警朝天鸣枪

昨日,香港“反修例”集会者发动“825荃葵青”游行,不过在下午再演变成暴力冲突,有示威者多次向警方投掷多枚燃烧弹,警方更出动水炮车清场。 香港警察公共关系科余鎧均高級警司,深夜向传媒汇报时承认,昨晚有警员曾向天开枪,惟她赞扬该警员英勇、可知,开枪是必须及合理。 她透露,在昨日冲突共36人被捕、年纪最小仅12岁,也有15名警员受伤。至于涉及拔枪警告的警员共六人。 余铠均在新闻发布会上播放一则短片,短片开头显示有数名示威者拿物件攻击警车;两名警员下车后赶到十字路口与同事集合,警员以盾和一群示威者对峙,有示威者以棍棒要击打警员,这批约十来人的警员只好节节退后。 警员后退期间突然听到一声枪响,有警员跌倒,数名警员掏枪阻吓示威者。 港警公关:情况危急 据了解突然有一名手无寸铁男子跪在警员前面,张开双手求警员别开枪,但遭持枪警员踢到在地。对此余鎧均称这是在场警员“自然反应”,因为当时难以辨识身份,警员目的在于驱散示威者保护自身及市民安全。 她也强调警员有可能遭受严重伤害,也指记者在示威者和警员之间,又有示威者向警察丢砖块,导致警方被迫鸣枪警告。 她也谴责示威者不可理喻、目无法纪。 余铠均指,昨午约3时35分公众游行期间,有集会人士偏离原定路线,拆毁水马、铁栏、设路障等堵塞街道;下午5时,有示威者在路边挖砖,在不同地点向警员投掷汽油弹及自制“致命武器”,包括在砖头上绑铁链,或向警车及警员投汽油弹,对警民构成威胁。 另一方面,也有记者和民众申诉被警员开枪击中,包括香港《米报》昨日在脸书发帖文谴责港警刻意袭击其记者;至于在24日下午,于香港观塘区举行的游行,亦有示威者疑似被橡胶子弹击中左眼,被送院治理。 据了解,这并不是港警首次在示威集会时朝天鸣枪,回溯2016年旺角骚动,当时有警员遇袭,另一警员向天开两枪,枪口曾对着人群。…

Yang Yin possibly facing “over 300 charges”

Chinese national and Singapore permanent resident, Yang Yin, could face “over 300…