At an event organised by the Japan Chamber of Commerce and Industry in Singapore yesterday (10 Oct), Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong told the audience that Singapore needs new people to fill up the new towns and industries his government is building (‘New towns, industries are being built, now what S’pore needs are new people: PM Lee‘).
“We have so many plans for Singapore, in terms of new industries, new businesses, new schools, new opportunities, new towns to live in, new parks — a new society to be built for the next generation. And what we need are new people — our children,” he said.
He opined that Singapore’s population can grow “a little bit” more.
Each year, there are around 35,000 Singaporeans born and 35,000 new permanent residents — out of which about 20,000 become citizens, he revealed. In other words, out of 55,000 new Singaporeans added to Singapore every year, 36 per cent were foreign immigrants.
However, if the birth rates do not improve in four to five years, the population may start to decline, he said. “Our challenge is that one-third of young people do not marry very soon even until their mid-30s,” Mr Lee said.
No money, no marriage
However, many young Singaporeans have commented that they are delaying marriage so that they can focus on building their careers and earning more pay.
Many felt they had to save up before committing to marriage because of the costs involved. These include the wedding reception, which can cost tens of thousands, and the costs of getting a home, renovation, and children.
Mr Kiat Ng, who was married few years ago, said he was broke after finishing his diploma at 26. He did want to get married earlier but his financial situation at the time did not allow him to do so.
“The thought of getting married would cross my mind. I would remember that I had no money, and then I’d forget it,” he revealed. After years of working as a piano technician, he saved up enough to marry his girlfriend.
Others complained that they delayed their marriage to save as much money as possible so as to keep up with the high cost of living.
Mr Hariharaan Malikaffure, a sales engineer who married at 34, said, “When you are single, it’s different. When you are married, you have to save up for your future together with your spouse.”
At least $670,000 needed to raise a child till university
Even after marriage, having a child in Singapore can be a very costly affair.
Last year, SmartParents.sg crunched some figures and got a rough estimate of what it would cost to raise a child in Singapore:

  • Pregnancy: At least $8,000
  • Age 0 to 2: At least $60,000
  • Age 3 to 6: At least $40,000
  • Age 7 to 12: At least $70,000
  • Age 13 to 16: At least $70,000
  • Age 17 to 19: At least $16,000 (JC) or $35,000 (poly)
  • Age 19 to 22: At least $40,940 (private) or $118,000 (local university) or $232,000 (overseas university)

The grand total cost of raising a child in Singapore is estimated to be at least $670,000. And that’s not even taking inflation into account.
Of course, in the case of Singapore’s ministers and top civil servants, it’s not really a problem for them to earn that amount and raise any children here in Singapore.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

“民选议员提出项目要败选者批准” 余振忠:对民主的何等荒谬和嘲弄

“民选国会议员提出的社区项目,却要由败选候选人批准,这对于我们的民主是何等荒谬和嘲弄。拖延或无视追问只为耍手段,也令那些需要使用这些设施的居民不便。” 工人党议员毕丹星和阿裕尼集选区基层组织顾问蔡荣良,此前为了选区内无障碍斜坡工程项目,隔空骂战。如今工人党前非选区议员余振忠,也加入战围,抨击受人民委托的选区议员提出项目,还要败选候选人批准,实为“荒谬”和对民主的嘲弄。 余振忠回忆,即便自己未投身政治前,就已对这种为了选票而做翻新的举动感到恼火,甚至还曾为此写信到《海峡时报》论坛力陈此弊端。项目动用的是纳税人的钱,但这种机制就形同要挟居民,迫使他们投票给执政党。 他强调,新加坡应该是属于新加坡人的,而不是人民行动党,即便和许多国人一样,他感谢开国先贤们对良好经济发展的贡献,但不代表人民认同,以不民主的手段来巩固自身权力。 而人民如果选择让行动党继续执政,也应该是基于他们自发的选择,而不是因为本身的福祉被要挟。 2011年至2015年余振忠担任非选区议员,他很清楚自己没有权限动用如切单选区的人民协会或设施,也肯定没办法像蔡荣良那样,有权力审批社区项目。 他提及两周前,《海时》编辑蔡美芬提醒,行动党如过于蛮横恐怕会招致反弹。这番话可能是对第四代领导,对付本地剧作家异议的手段有微词。但同样的道理也适用在上述批准社区项目的机制问题,以及其他过度行使政治霸权而排除人民的事项。 “新加坡应该属于新加坡人的,不是任何政党。我们不应该容许这种霸权,透过不合理和不民主的手段来要挟新加坡人。” 毕丹星称提出体制问题 此前,工人党阿裕尼集选区议员毕丹星,抱怨选区内“一个简单、数月就可完工的无障碍斜坡,搞到要几年才完成。有多少乐龄人士、行动不便人士或康复者,无法从这类设施受益?” 他质疑行动党如何决定人民协会在反对党选区运作?也抱怨反对党议员提出的提案,往往都被人协忽略。 对此,蔡荣良,在本月19日发文反驳,表示对毕丹星对于上述无障碍斜坡项目发表不实言论“感遗憾”,也质疑后者借此事转移对工人党市镇会官司的注意。他也反驳毕丹星指因为是反对党的提案所以延迟的说法。…

资媒局要求STR部落格删“不实文章” 《砂报告》:克莱尔未被咨询

资讯通讯媒体发展局(IMDA)指出,时事部落格States Times Review(STR)一篇誌期本月5日的文章“不实和含诽谤成分”,要求该部落格在今日5时前撤下有关文章。 资媒局经评估后认为,该文章已破坏了公众对新加坡政府的信心,同时抵触《互联网运作准则》(Internet Code of Practice)中“被禁止内容”(prohibited content)条款 若STR未删文,该局将指示互联网服务提供商,限制公众访问该网站。 有关文章标题为“李显龙成为一马公司弊案关键调查对象”,指马来西亚和新加坡签署了数项不平等协议,作为换取新加坡银行替一马公司资金洗黑钱的代价。 STR拒绝删文  “恭候总理起诉”…

Exploitation of migrant workers = exploitation of low-wage local workers

~ By Jolovan Wham ~ The Humanitarian Organisation for Migration Economics (HOME)…

PAP has abused power to secure political advantage: WP

Andrew Loh / “At the start of [our] pre-election public outreach, I…