by Martin Abbugao / Catherine Lai
British inventor James Dyson has dropped out of the race to produce electric cars in the face of stiff competition and after criticism of the Brexit-backing billionaire’s decision to build the vehicle in Singapore.
Dyson, famed for his bagless vacuum cleaners, announced two years ago that he was developing an electric car as part of a £2.5 billion ($3.1 billion) investment drive in future technology, with the first vehicles expected in 2021.
The ambitious project catapulted the 72-year-old entrepreneur into competition against more established players such as US firm Tesla, founded by business magnate Elon Musk, and carmakers from the US to China.
Adding to his difficulties, the plan ran into controversy when the company revealed that its first car plant would be in Singapore and its global headquarters were shifting to the affluent city-state.
Dyson insisted it was to be closer to booming Asian markets — but there was fury that the tycoon was not investing more in UK manufacturing after vocally supporting Britain’s exit from the European Union.
There had however been little indication that Dyson was having second thoughts about the high-profile project, which hundreds of employees were already working on, until an announcement late Thursday of the abrupt U-turn.
Dyson said in a statement that his team had developed a “fantastic car” based on an “ingenious” approach but added: “Though we have tried very hard throughout the development process, we simply cannot make it commercially viable.”
“We have been through a serious process to find a buyer for the project which has, unfortunately, been unsuccessful so far,” he said.
There are 523 people in the automotive team, the majority in Britain and 22 in Singapore, a spokesman said. Dyson said “as many of the team as possible” would be reassigned to other roles in the company.
Singapore government agency the Economic Development Board predicted the decision to ditch the project would have a minimal disruption on Dyson’s operations in the Asian trading hub, as it was at an early stage.

– Tough project –

In May, Dyson unveiled brief details of patents filed for the electric car and said it would be more energy-efficient than rivals — and with “very large wheels” for city and rough-terrain driving.
But analysts were sceptical about the plan and not surprised about the change of heart.
“From the first instance it was always difficult to understand why Dyson thought that it would have any sort of competitive advantage in actually embarking on this project,” Walter Theseira, a transport economist at Singapore University of Social Sciences, told AFP.
“Given the global competitive landscape, you’re adding a new manufacturer which is untested in the car industry.”
Nitin Pangarkar, from National University of Singapore’s Business School, added the car industry was becoming “less attractive” as cities create better public transport networks and consumers change behaviour through steps such as sharing rides.
“Dyson’s resources… are probably better spent elsewhere, in products similar to its current businesses,” he added.
Electric vehicles are increasing in popularity as governments worldwide seek to phase out polluting petrol and diesel cars, but producing them profitably is a challenge even for leading manufacturers.
While Tesla has strong consumer appeal, investors have been frustrated by the pace of production and the company’s inability to hit its financial targets.
Despite dumping the project, Dyson insisted the company would continue a $3.1 billion investment programme in new technology, including the manufacture of batteries, robotics, machine learning and AI.
The company in May completed the move of its headquarters to Singapore, where many international firms have their Asian bases, and Dyson has since made headlines by going on a property-buying spree.
He reportedly paid Sg$74 million ($54 million) for Singapore’s biggest, most expensive penthouse — a three-floor residence with a rooftop terrace and jacuzzi.
And the tycoon also bought a luxury house complete with an indoor waterfall, spiral staircase, landscaped garden and infinity pool, according to local media.
– AFP

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Jobs Bank updated with new features but fails to stop firms from pre-hiring foreigners

The Manpower Ministry (MOM) issued a press release on Tuesday (10 Nov)…

郭俨进泵井溺毙案:一级准尉法立被判13个月监禁

民防服役人员郭俨进中士被推入泵井溺毙一案,一级准尉法立(Mohamed Farid Mohd Saleh)犯下教唆他人做出鲁莽行为导致他人重伤罪名成立,昨天(20日)下午被判13个月监禁。 法立去年5月13日涉嫌指示将即将退役的郭俨进推入12米的泵井,导致溺毙身亡。同案被告亦包括将郭俨进推入死亡泵井的努尔法特瓦(Fatwa),法瓦特在日前已承认罪行,并接受年4星期监禁,目前正在服刑中。 控方对此表示,被告作为现场最高级别的民防人员,不仅没有履行保护安危的义务和责任,反而唆使法瓦特将过眼睛郭俨进推入泵井。 “法瓦是在被告的唆使下采取行动,因此,被告应与法瓦受到相对的惩处。在本案中不应有任何的差别对待”,控方表示。 控方指出,鉴于被告在第一时间不如法瓦一样,一开始就认罪,明显缺乏悔意,因此将刑法提高到至少14个月以上。 然而,被告的律师则争取四至八个月的刑法,他表明,尽管法立有作出指示,却没料掉法瓦特会以偷袭的方式将郭俨进推入其中,而且事后法立也相当后悔。 地方法官则表示,刑法本身必须反映本案所造成的伤害,与所应当的罪责,欲透过此案向公众传达鲁莽与冒险的行为是不能容忍,必须准备承担相关法律罪责,最重要是向军警人员传达类似陋习应杜绝的信息。 另外,法官也同意控方立场,认为被告已在民防部队服务长达11年,是清楚“整人”活动应被禁止,并了解泵井的深度和黑暗,却依然唆使将郭俨进推入泵井,因此刑罚也起到阻摄作用。 除了法特瓦与法立,另名被告阿迪哈扎里(Adighazali…

Three new members appointed to respective boards of SMRT Trains Ltd

Singapore Mass Rapid Transit (SMRT) Trains Ltd announced its three new members…

Husband of accused in Bishan murder, accused of withholding evidence and assault on victim

The husband of the accused murderer for the death of a Myanmar domestic…