During the debate about the Maintenance of Religious Harmony Act (MHRA) in parliament on Monday (7 October), Mr Shanmugam was apparently taken aback by something that Worker’s Party MP Mr Faisal Manap said.
Mr Faisal had asserted that he doesn’t quite agree with the principle of separating politics and religion. He said, “As a Muslim, Islam is understood as a way of life. Islam encompasses all aspects of life, including politics and the way to practise politics. And I understand that Christianity also believes that it is unlikely that religion can be separated from politics.”
Mr Shanmugam and Mr Faisal went back and forth on this with the Law Minister repeatedly asking Mr Faisal if he agrees that religion and politics should be kept separate.
Mr Faisal continued to assert his belief that religion encompasses all aspects of life which include politics. He did eventually said, “I do agree that religion needs to be kept aside or apart from politics so that the religion won’t be used to gain personal benefit or the benefit of any political party.”
Following this exchange, WP politician Gerald Giam said on Facebook that Mr Faisal was wise to refuse being trapped into taking a binary position on the matter.
He explained that answering ‘no’ to Mr Shanmugam’s question will paint you as a “religious extremist while saying ‘yes’ would mean you “forever give up the right to mention your faith and your policy position in the same breath”.
Mr Giam pointed out, “His answer was more nuanced, yet not that hard to understand: Religion should never be used for political ends but one’s faith cannot be divorced from all political matters, especially those with a clear moral dimension.”
The WP politician cautioned that politicians and religious readers should never use religion to whip up support for themselves, political parties or religious groups. However, the two cannot be completely separated.
He explained, “But it will be antithetical to the constitutional right to religious freedom to prohibit anyone from allowing her faith to even partially inform her decisions, political or otherwise.”
“Politicians must always act in the best interests of their constituents and citizens. Very often their faith can guide them in doing so.”

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

穿凯蒂猫T恤公然抽电子烟 青年反差形象惹议

日前,一名身穿凯蒂猫T恤,但在公共巴士上公然抽电子烟的青年,其反差形象被身旁的朋友拍摄下来放到网络上,引起网民议论。 据悉,该视频并没有明确指出所拍摄地点与时间,但巴士经过义顺公园小贩中心。9秒视频内,可清楚看见青年是坐在巴士内吸起电子烟,浓浓大烟从嘴巴吐出,青年显然没有顾及旁边的乘客,自顾自吸起烟,甚至身旁朋友也一起拍下视频。 在被朋友拍下视频后,青年仍对着镜头作出剪刀手的姿势,并不惧怕被拍摄下来。 视频上传后,引来网民的议论,大部分网民非议该青年行为,而且并揶揄表示与身穿的凯蒂猫 的形象不符。 根据《烟草(广告与销售控制)法令》购买所有电子烟、电子烟斗和电子雪茄属于违法,将可能被处以最高2000元的罚款。此外,任何人在禁止的地方或车辆内吸烟,最高可处以 1000 元的罚款。 另外,任何引进电子吸烟器属违法,换言之,任何人透过网络购买并运到新加坡供个人使用均属于违法行为,初犯可判处最高一万元罚款或6个月监禁;累犯则将被处以两万元罚款,或12个月监禁。 有网民把该视频转发给环境局,目前尚待当局回应。

日做18小时午夜要照顾女婴 印尼女佣掐死女婴判误杀罪监七年

每日几乎做18小时,午夜还得照顾一岁女婴,一名印尼籍女佣,在两年前为阻止雇主女婴哭闹,一时恼火掐死女婴,被高庭判误杀罪,坐牢七年。 据昨日《联合早报》报导,称名案发生于2016年5月8日凌晨2时,在四美第225座组屋某单位,被告当时在该单位为一户张姓人家打工,死者是年仅一岁的女婴张妍嘉(洋名Richelle)。 24岁的被告自2015年1月起到张家打工,除了做家务,也负责照顾张家一对儿女,分别是三岁大男童及当时刚出生的女婴。 曾申诉工作辛苦、禁用手机,三次要求换雇主 开始工作约四个月后,被告就向中介要求换雇主,或把她送回印尼,前后要求了三次。被告称工作辛苦,整天被女雇主骂和被嫌弃做得不好。 女雇主也不准被告使用手机,被告两次偷偷找人帮忙买手机,结果两次都被女雇主发现并没收。 案发前一个月,女佣第三次要求离职,女雇主原本答应,但考虑到家婆无法照顾孩子后改变主意。 每天清洗一次壁橱 同一期间,女佣的工作量也增加,单是清洗壁橱就从每周一次改成每天一次。 案发当晚午夜时分,被告忙完一堆家务后开始入睡,和女婴在同一张床上就寝。不久后,女婴摔下床嚎啕大哭,被告抱起女婴安抚了一会儿就继续睡觉。 凌晨2时,女婴的哭声把被告吵醒,她起身喂奶,但女婴吐奶还越哭越大声。疲惫被告越发生气,她用力揍女婴的脖子尝试阻止她哭,同时把对女雇主的不满发泄在女婴身上。 但女婴仍不停哭泣,恼火的被告于是用左手抓住女婴脖子,右手猛压在脖子左侧,直至半小时后,女婴双眼紧闭,不再出声,被告才松手回去睡觉。…

Attempt to smuggle 525 cartons and 250 packets of assorted duty-unpaid cigarettes foiled by ICA

525 cartons and 250 packets of assorted duty-unpaid cigarettes were discovered in…

Malaysia GE15 candidates slam requirement to apply permit for election walkabouts

MALAYSIA — Several candidates contesting in Malaysia General Election 15 (GE15) have…