In a parliament session on Monday (7 October), Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam and Worker’s Party MP Faisal Manap were involved in a heated exchange during the debate about the Maintenance of Religious Harmony Act (MHRA).
Mr Faisal uttered that he did not quite agree with the idea of keeping religion and politics separate, and this did not go down too well with the Law Minister.
Speaking in Malay on the changes of MHRA, Mr Faisal said: “As a Muslim, Islam is understood as a way of life. Islam encompasses all aspects of life, including politics and the way to practise politics. And I understand that Christianity also believes that it is unlikely that religion can be separated from politics.”
Upon hearing his statement, Mr Shanmugam asked WP’s MP to clarify what he meant, and the duo went back and forth on this issue with Mr Shanmugam repeatedly asking Mr Faisal if he agrees that religion and politics should be kept separate.
After a prolonged debate, Mr Faisal eventually said, “I do agree that religion needs to be kept aside or apart from politics so that the religion won’t be used to gain personal benefit or the benefit of any political party.”
In attempt to clarify what his fellow party member meant exactly, WP chief Pritam Singh commented that, “In Singapore, as a minority MP for any party, you represent not just members of your community, you represent members of other faiths. And I think the only way to move forward is to accept that there has be a certain degree of understanding towards other faiths and move forward in a way which accepts that we must be mindful of introducing religion into politics,” he said, noting that he is speaking for himself.
“I think ultimately for a Member of Parliament of any political party in Singapore, I think it is important that you remember that you have to represent the interests of every community, not just yours,” Mr Singh added.

The video of this intense debate was uploaded on Mothership’s Facebook page which garnered strong reactions from online users. Many of them slammed Mr Faisal for his opinion and felt that religion and politics should always be separated. Citing Malaysia and Indonesia where politics and religion are intertwined, they noted that “countries which religion is involved in politics ended up the religion being abused for the individual gains which ultimately destroys that country”. Even the national pledge stated that religion should be separated from politics in order to ensure harmony, some netizens said. They added that religion should only act as a guide in politics.







However, a bunch of online users felt sorry for Mr Faisal as they felt that his language barrier hindered him from articulating his thoughts properly. “I think what Mr Manap was talking about is certain values that is carried forth in whatever he (a Muslim) does in life, hence it cannot be separated,” said Darrell Foam Man Lim.



Others applauded Mr Singh for stepping in and helping Mr Faisal to state his points clearly. “Mr Pritam responded well and gave a very clear explanation on how to move the discussion forward,” wrote Yao Weixiong Shem. They added that he showed a lot of “tact and grace in answering honestly and plainly what the right way forward should be”.



Although many agreed that politics and religion should be separated, however others opined that consideration of all faiths must be there when making policies in order “to ensure that the policies would not be leaning to the benefit or loss to any religion”. Kenneth Koh felt that “religion can serve as a moral compass which underpins the values of an individual which in turn produce the desired outcome in the form of sound decision and contributions to our society at the family level or at societal level.”



Separately, a group of online users also criticised Mr Shanmugam for “deliberately making it difficult” for Mr Faisal by asking him to answer “yes or no” for such a complicated and sensitive question. “Attempting to trap with a yes no, agree disagree question which is not simple and or applicable in every scenario where religion and politics are concerned,” Darren Yong said. Some even called the Law Minister as “spineless bully” and a “snake”.



Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Netizen files police report against ‘hardcore PAP supporter’ for allegedly issuing veiled threat to Facebook user for exposing PAP’s Ivan Lim

A netizen has filed a police report against a “hardcore” People Action…

民调显示仅41巴仙受访者 肯定新加坡政治领导应对能力

上月3日至19日,总部设于我国的研究机构“黑箱研究”(Blackbox Research,以及民调公司Toluna联手,对23个国家和地区共1万2592名民众进行民调,调查民众对各国政府应对冠状病毒19 危机的满意度。 整体满意度得分最高为中国(85分)、越南居次(77分)、印度第三(59分)、马来西亚第四(58分)以及台湾(50分)。至于我国整体得分48分,与印尼齐名,排名第七。 满意度评分分为四个方面,包括政治领导力、企业领导力、社区和媒体。 新加坡政治领导力满意度仅41巴仙 目前,冠状病毒19全球累计确诊已超过433万,如何应对疫情也考验各国领导者能力。全球仅七国政治领导获得民众过半满意,包括中国、越南、新西兰、阿联酋、马来西亚、印度和台湾。 而新加坡方面,仅41巴仙受访者,满意政治领导者对疫情的表现。 不过,抽样参与调查的样本数很小,仅300国人。故此读者姑且仅将此民调作为参考。值得注意的是,民调是在上月3日至19日进行,而我国总理李显龙,是在4月3日宣布,7日起落实阻断措施。我国从原本的防疫典范,因为确诊病例剧增,也需要落实更严谨措施,相信也多少动摇民众信心。 杨莉明曾指阻断措施或能尽早开始,不是等到四月 尽管强调政府一早采取应对措施,但在口罩课题上,也从一开始的“没生病不用戴口罩”,到后来开始意识到口罩防范的重要,最终要求民众一出门就必须戴口罩。 国家发展部长黄循财,在接受外国媒体采访时也坦言,在这场前所未有的冠状病毒19…

Train fault causes service breakdown between Marina Bay and Newton MRT stations

(Image from @ze_kaiser, twitter) On Tuesday evening, passengers commuting on the SMRT’s North…

Hong Kong Journalists Association lodges complaints to independent watchdog against police treatment of media during protest; Would Singapore journalists have the same means?

As journalists do their best to cover the historic extradition bill protests…