Three weeks ago, the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) released a video to promote the launch of their revamped website. The video, posted on the party’s Facebook page, features a young girl talking about the website.
It seems that there are some people who disagree with the party releasing a video with children in it. Specifically, a letter was published in the Straits Times forum on 30 September written by a Sean Lim who said he was “concerned to see a child anchoring the minute-long video and promoting the party brand”.
He added that he doubts that the child “has the maturity to understand partisan party politics” and questioned whether she was reading off a prepared script of actually expressing her views of the SDP.
Mr Lim went on to ask, “Does the Election Department have guidelines regarding the use of minors in political advertising?”
He added that “it seems inappropriate” to have children be used as the face of any political party for the purposes of furthering the party’s agenda.
He concluded, “Children should not be involved in conveying a party’s message directly.”
In response to Mr Lim’s letter, the Senior Assistant Director of Political Donations and Communications in the Elections Department Tay Chai Luan noted that primary and secondary school students are not allowed to appear in a video or take part in other activities to promote a political party during the period beginning Nomination Day and until the start of Polling Day.
The response, published on ST on 6 October, did note that while the prohibition does not apply outside the stated period, political parties should avoid using children in their activities.
The ED said: “While this prohibition does not apply outside of this period, we agree with the writer that political parties should refrain from inappropriate use of young children who will not fully understand what they may be promoting or subjecting themselves to.”
Following from that, SDP responded to the ED’s letter with a post on Facebook (9 October) saying that the young child in the video is a daughter of one of their CEC members and that the parent’s consent was obtained.

In the post, which was also published on the Facebook page of party secretary-general Dr Chee Soon Juan, SDP stated, “we have a proud tradition of involving our family members in our activities. This is because we stand for and champion values like compassion, courage and diversity, values that we feel our children are better off learning at a young age. A family that works together, stays together.”
Going further, SDP pointed out the double standard at play here given that the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) has “never been shy of using young children as props for its own ends”.
SDP then included several screenshots of the PAP Facebook page showing photos that were posted of several PAP politicians having a photo op with many young children.
SDP asked in their post, “In the PAP’s case, we’d like to know if any of the children appearing in the pictures posted on its Facebook understand “what they may be promoting or subjecting themselves to”? More importantly, was parental consent obtained?”
Another question would be: are there different sets of rules for different parties? Given that the ED commented on SDP’s recent video, why are they not also commenting on what the PAP did during GE2015 when they held a press conference in a nursing home in Sembawang when it was against the constitution of the facility for its premise to be used as for political events?
Back then, the PAP had been the one to book the location for the press conference during the election period. After a complaint was made by an opposition candidate, the Ministry of Home Affairs warned the Sunshine Welfare Action Mission to adhere to its constitution.
Interestingly, the PAP team which included now-Minister of Education Ong Ye Kung and led by current Minister of Transport Mr Khaw Boon Wan said that they “not check with the VWO’s constitution” before making the booking. The reason given was that the team had rented the premise on “purely commercial terms”, partly to support the home and partly because the venue was accessible and had sufficient space.
That is surprising. Wouldn’t a minister and political candidate know such things?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

PAP’s Masagos Zulkifli wrongly refers to Lee Hsien Yang as Singapore’s PM during Tampines GRC e-rally

People’s Action Party (PAP) Masagos Zulkifli made a verbal gaffe on Friday…

马财长:与新加坡良性竞争 政策公平马劳愿回国

马来西亚财政部长林冠英呼吁,大马企业家是时候发挥“做得到”精神,与邻国新加坡展开良性竞争,超越邻国。 新政府新作风,马国将新加坡视为强劲竞争对手,相信是为了打造国内健康的竞争能力,财长林冠英鼓励本地企业力争上游,营造生机蓬勃的市场经济。 林冠英今日出席第二阶段全球加速计划(Global Accelerator Programme)推介礼时说,大马人和政府需要秉持“能做到”的精神,超越南方邻国新加坡。 “马来西亚需要一个‘做得到’的精神。好比说,为什么每次都要输给新加坡?我们有能力在他们的赛局中打败他们,就好像槟城,已经多次赢了新加坡。” 林冠英称,他并非宣扬仇视邻国情绪,反之是恨铁不成钢,想鼓舞士气让马国人相信自己的能力,再者,也有许多马来西亚良才在新加坡工作。 林冠英也是槟城前首长,他承认新加坡在市场行销方面很强势。但他强调马国虽是新政府,也拥有全世界最年长的首相,集活力和素质于一身。 不过,随后林冠英表示,新政府需先减少国家债务,致使一些竞选宣言被迫延后。 希盟政府上台至今已超过一个月,主要着重在减轻人民负担的政策,例如推行零消费税、继续派发国民生活援助金、关闭多余的政府机构等,以及下令彻查导致1兆令吉举债的一马公司弊案。 马劳:政策公平愿回国发展 马国不乏人才,只是过去碍于在国内发展受限,只能往国外特别是邻国新加坡工作。种族政策、官僚作风和贪污问题等因素,也令外资却步。当权者把利益分配给朋党,有感怀才不遇,人才也只能远走他乡。…

Indranee Rajah: Budget 2020 will focus on volunteerism promotion

The new Budget 2020 will have provisions for promoting volunteerism and assisting…

SIA says it receives overwhelming “strong support” for its training center tours

It was reported earlier that Singapore Airlines (SIA) had incurred its first…