Aerial view of active construction site with backhoes and other equipment surrounded by lush green trees in Singapore. (Image from aminkorea / Shutterstock.com)

According to a recent study by National Parks Board (NParks), land in Singapore has become a net emitter of carbon in 2014, a change from two years previous when it was a carbon sink or absorber. The report attributed this to an increase in a significant conversion of land for development since 2012 and the use of new measurement data on the growth rate of tree biomass.
The study was undertaken as part of the Biennial Update Report which Singapore submits to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change as part of its international obligations every two years.
In the most recent report which was submitted in December last year, it was noted that Singapore’s greenhouse gas emissions totalled 50,908.13 gigagram CO2 equivalent (Gg CO2eq). This is slightly higher than the emissions indicated in the previous report submitted in December 2016 where the country’s 2012 emissions totalled 48,094.65 Gg CO2eq.
Looking deeper, a comparison of the two reports indicate that the category of land use, land use-change and forestry in 2012 showed a net removal of -239.25 Gg CO2eq (including N2O) while in 2014, there was a net emission of 62.03 Gg CO2eq.
However, the report did note that the numbers in this particular sector oscillates over the years. It was also highlighted that the net emissions from agriculture and land-use in Singapore are ‘negligible’ when compared to other economic sectors given the country’s small land-size and highly urbanised landscape. Overall, emissions from land use only contributed 0.12% of Singapore’s total emissions in 2014.
The biggest contributor to the country’s greenhouse gas emissions is still fossil fuels, specifically natural gas. About 95% of Singapore’s electricity is still generated using natural gas.
In a Straits Times report, Associate Professor L. Roman Carrasco from the National University of Singapore (NUS) said that there are two ways forests function as climate change mitigators. First, trees take in carbon dioxide from the atmosphere through the process of photosynthesis. Second, forests also prevent carbon from being re-released into the atmosphere by locking those gasses in tree trunks and roots.
“Compared to cutting the forest and planting new trees, keeping mature forests is a much more effective way to prevent climate change,” said the professor.
Deputy director for international biodiversity conservation at NParks Mr Hassan Ibrahim said that Singapore’s vegetated and forest areas – from nature reserves to mangroves – remain as carbon sinks in Singapore.
In an effort to regenerate the country’s secondary forests in nature parks that buffer Bukit Timah and the Central Catchment Nature Researches, NParks introduced the Forest Restoration Action Plan which is a 10-year plan during which native species of flora will be planted to improve soil conditions and attracts dispersers and pollinators. On top of that, invasive weed species will be removed to further help the forest regenerate.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

韩国政府吁民众戴口罩防疫

由于韩国确诊病例急速暴增,周日更上升至169确诊病例,韩国目前已将武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)疫情警示等级,提升为最严重的“红色”第四级,以遏制武汉冠状病毒的传播。 韩国目前人口逾5千100万人,自韩国确诊病例暴增以来,目前已逾700例,而韩国也开始提出各项预防措施。 许多韩国人几乎每天都带着口罩生活,而且韩国当局的警告也随处可见如预防感染三撇步:随时戴口罩;使用肥皂洗手超过30秒;并在咳嗽时用手遮盖,避免传染。 此外,韩国人也开发了数个预防感染应用程式和网站,让韩国国民能够即使得知感染者在10公里半径内的位置。 与此同时,韩国重灾区大邱市与清道郡亦被列为“特别护理区”,大部分大邱市的街上已不像往常那般热闹,冷冷清清。 除了教会的“可能感染源”,所有军事基地在检测出三名士兵呈阳性后,均都被封锁,韩国当局亦怀疑其疫情均源自于清道郡。 与此同时,我国政府在早前曾建议新加坡人若健康状态良好,就不需要带上口罩。这样的“贴士”在网络上与报纸上宣传。然而,随着2月7日我国进入橙色警戒状态后,这样的呼吁也随之减低。 陈振声:若领导都戴口罩出席记者会    所有人都恐慌 事实上,新加坡中华总商会(SCCCI)的闭门会议,贸工部长陈振声向一群商人与基层领袖解释为何他们不赞成让健康的人戴口罩 ,其中一段录音被泄露,从中陈振声表示,“我们是否有足够口罩,将取决于三种因素:口罩储备、口罩使用率以及再补口罩的频率。…

TOC Ltd: Registration forms submitted to MDA, lingering problems

MEDIA RELEASE The Opinion Collaborative Ltd (TOC Ltd) has submitted its registration…

Coronavirus-stricken stock markets tanked following global oil price crash

On Monday (9 March), a vicious selloff was triggered due to world…

居民问责白沙-榜鹅市镇会:是否动用公款聘请天价律师达文星?

一名白沙-榜鹅区居民,致函询问白沙-榜鹅市镇会(PRPTC),在使用市镇会款项用于与居民利益无关的诉讼、聘请律师时,是否已咨询居民的同意? 曾代表人民力量党于2011年参选蔡厝港议席的李子旭,揭露一名住在白沙-榜鹅区的友人,致函其市镇会提问四个问题: 市镇会是否能未咨询居民同意,擅用大笔款项,用在非市镇用途? 市镇会可否对居民隐瞒有关大笔款项的资讯? 市镇会在聘请律师时,是否货比三家律师报价? 市镇会是否违反了自身条规? 李子旭说,其友人表示,致函提问白沙-榜鹅市镇会,主要是要问责,既然该市镇会聘请了新加坡最贵的律师达文星,是否有动用市镇会的款项? 诉讼案的中心人物—诉方律师达文星,乃是行动党籍大巴窑集选区前议员,也是已故李光耀和总理李显龙的王牌律师,为他们在诉讼案中打败过多名对手,包括邓亮洪、徐顺全、博客鄞义林,以及多家外国媒体如《经济学人》、彭博社和《纽约时报》。 市镇会:诉讼仍进行不回应 但是,两周前电邮给市镇会的询问仿如石沉大海,即是这名居民反复拨电给市镇会,得到的答复也只是“不会针对审讯中的诉讼作回应。” 李子旭把该居民的经历分享在脸书,让更多人知道此事,一同问责该市镇会是否有合理使用公款。 居民质问聘请达文星律师费…