Professor Tommy Koh. Source: ST

At the Singapore Bicentennial Conference yesterday (1 Oct), the former Singapore’s UN Permanent Representative Professor Tommy Koh cautioned the 4th generation PAP leaders that two of their priorities should be to maintain racial and religious harmony and make Singapore a more equal society.
These include looking into allegations of discriminatory hiring practices and working to make Singapore a classless society, he told the audience. He said, “Today, Singapore is not a classless society. We are divided by wealth, by income, by profession, by place of residence, and even by the school we attend.”
He hopes the 4G leaders will help establish a more caring and inclusive society in Singapore, with employers and the Government stepping in to help those who will be laid off as the economy restructures.
“We should not abandon the displaced workers because we don’t want more and more Singaporeans to become Grab drivers or, worse, to join the ranks of the angry voters,” he said.
“Remember this: It was the angry voters who helped to elect President (Donald) Trump in the United States. It was the angry voters in the United Kingdom who voted to leave the European Union.”
Discriminatory hiring practices – Hiring own kind
Indeed, as far back as 2013, incidences of discriminatory hiring practice came to the attention of then Manpower Minister Tan Chuan Jin.
At the time, Minister Tan informed the Parliament that he had heard anecdotes of how in some cases, heads of business units or HR managers have a preference for candidates they are familiar with or of the same nationality, for reasons that are irrelevant to job performance and irrespective of whether they are more competent than other candidates.
“We have also heard of situations where Singaporeans were retrenched or made to resign in the name of down-sizing, only to realise later that their positions were given to foreigners, who were coincidentally from the same countries as the business heads,” Minister Tan added.
“Let me be quite blunt. Would these practices not sound discriminatory? Would any respectable progressive company endorse these practices? If this hiring is indeed because they care only about choosing familiar candidates and not about hiring the ‘best man for the job’, then such practices have no place in Singapore’s workplaces.”
“I know that Singaporeans perceive some outcomes to be against the principles of meritocracy and fairness, and I fully understand why we feel angry in the process,” he shared.
The Fair Consideration Framework (FCF) was later pushed out by the Manpower Ministry under Minister Tan so as to send a “strong signal to all employers that they should consider Singaporeans fairly in filling available jobs”.
However, not long after, he was moved out of Manpower Ministry to the Social and Family Development Ministry in 2015 and in 2017, he was moved out of the Cabinet altogether to become the Speaker of Parliament.
Angry Grab drivers
And speaking of “angry voters”, indeed, many Grab and taxi drivers are already feeling frustrated with the ruling government.
One good example is James Lim who regularly blogs about his cab driving experience. He became jobless in his fifties. With a family to support and unable to find a suitable job, he was forced to become a cab driver. He wrote that he blogs so as to make his dull job “a bit more interesting”.
In one of his write-ups, Mr Lim got so frustrated with the policies of the government that he advised young Singaporeans to emigrate if they could.
He said, “With unabated hordes of foreigners still coming in to depress their (Singaporeans’) wages or even displace them at the workplace, reduce them to second-class citizens and a minority in their own country, how much loyalty and love can we expect from local-bred Singaporean for this country down the road?”
“If you’re a young and educated Singaporean family with valuable skill, I would encourage you to migrate to another country,” he added.
Perhaps Prof Koh might want to consider inviting cabby James Lim to his talks in future so as to better convey his points to the 4G leaders.
 

Subscribe
Notify of
8 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

The end of 100 years “‘real’ affordable healthcare” under this present Parliament?

Parliament debates removing century-old law by sending to Select Committee 1st time since…

SPP’s Osman Sulaiman: Remember the broken promises of the PAP

The Singapore People’s Party (SPP) candidate for Bishan Toa-Payoh GRC Khan Osman…

患红斑狼疮申请早领公积金遭拒 妇女致函新加坡总统求助

“我希望您能认真酌量我的申请。除非已走投无路,我无意自杀。这是残酷的世界。” 一名单亲妈妈在上月15日,写信给新加坡总统哈莉玛求助,申诉自己患有红斑狼疮,自2016年起就一直待业。她想申请提早领出公积金过活和养活家人,遗憾的是被当局拒绝。 2011年,蔡莉莉(译音)被诊断患有系统性红斑狼疮(Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, SLE),致使她出现全身疼痛、嗜睡等症状,同时对光过敏和时有出现“脑雾”(指难以形成清晰思维和记忆)现象,这些情况都致使他难以重返工作职场。再者基于经济拮据,她不得不停止治疗。 现年45岁的蔡莉莉,自从2016年6月起就因为健康问题,处在待业状态,她相信因为她的病况和年龄,致使他迄今所有工作申请都石沉大海。 事主曾是南洋女子高中和国家初级学院学生,目前22岁的女儿就读新加坡理工学院,成绩优异;事主75岁的父亲则不幸患癌和心脏衰竭,只能依靠每月仅472元入息的公积金积蓄过活,因此事主还要负起照顾父亲的责任。 财务压力曾企图自杀 她在信中坦言,自己因为病情和财务压力,陷入忧郁和有自杀倾向。甚至曾为了能领出公积金和保险来养活家人,事主企图自杀,所幸被送入邱德拔医院急诊处急救。 事主表示,在2018年曾前往教育部长王乙康的选区会见人民活动,希望透过后者协助申请早领公积金,来支付自己约900元的房贷,不过被公积金局拒绝。 再者,基于自己积蓄所剩无几,且必须向亲友举债过活,故此要求公积金局让他领出自己的保健储蓄和特别户头。 她在信中也表示打算向建屋局申请租赁组屋,并卖掉现有的组屋藉此摆脱房贷负担。…

PM Lee says SG believes in India’s potential at book launch dedicated to SG-India relations

At the launch of a book dedicated on Singapore-India relations at NUS…