On Tuesday (1 October), National University of Singapore Professor Dr Tommy Koh opined that Singapore is a first world country with third world citizens as many of them don’t have the civic-mindedness that is required out of people in an advanced country.
“I am more critical of Singaporeans than of the Government. Many of our people don’t give a damn for the environment when they should. Many of our people are selfish and unkind. Just look at the way they drive,” explained the Ambassador-at-Large at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
He said this while speaking at the Singapore Bicentennial Conference, conducted at Raffles City Convention Centre. The conference was organised by the Institute of Policy Studies.
During the dialogue, Prof Koh and Bloomberg News editor-in-chief John Micklethwait came together to discuss areas in which the people of Singapore can improve.
Prof Koh expressed that he wants the poverty line in the country to be set higher and raise the wages for workers. He also pointed out that there is a large gap in terms of pay between a company’s top executive and its rank and file employees.
When asked on whether there’s an alternative to capitalism, Prof Koh said that it’s better to ask what kind of capitalism Singapore wants.
He explained that moral capitalism is when businesses consider themselves accountable to both shareholders and the society. They also should show care for the environment, ensure their employees are well taken care, and prioritise gender equality and diversity, Prof Koh said.
“I love Singapore. I would die for Singapore. But are we a perfect people? We are not,” he said.
He added, “But I believe that we can always be better and in the remaining years of my life, I want to dedicate my time, energy to making Singapore an even better place, and Singaporeans an even better people.”
Upon reading Prof Koh’s statement about Singapore, many netizens agreed with him. Commenting in the Facebook page of ST, they said that many people lack civic-mindedness, manners and social etiquette, which can be clearly seen at how they behave in public areas. For instance, how noisy they are in cafes, spitting and throwing rubbish in common places, and many more. Eugene Sim described Singaporeans as “a well educated generation with a barbaric behaviour”.
    
Although a large group of them shared the same opinion as Prof Khor, others blamed foreigners for the Third Class mentality that citizens in Singapore have. They said that the city-state has no more national identity with the amount of foreigners in the country, and “many migrants touted as talents are from countries known to have no respect for personal space and orderliness”. As such, Maevis Lee noted that locals’ lack of civic-mindedness happened due to “new citizens bring their old habits” to Singapore.





On the other hand, some blamed the society and government for how the people in the country are behaving. “Chan ShiJie said “the society & government mould the citizens into only thinking about themselves & not others”, causing them to behave badly in public.
Some opined that Singaporeans are living in a stressful environment with no social protection, long working hours and demanding bosses, causing them to care less about the environment and society. David Firdaus highlighted that “because we are a society blinded by money and material wealth so much that courtesy and manners takes a back seat”.
   

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

生意难做!客人不守社交距离 餐饮业者忧连累餐厅被关!

生意难做!餐饮业者吐苦水,客人不遵守安全预防规定,业者屡劝不果,还被社交距离官员警告罚款,业者无奈只好举报警察。 在疫情的侵袭下,全球的生活形态也开始改变,人们出门都必须戴上口罩,保持好社交安全距离,但似乎仍有部分人无视这些规定。 Vatos Urban Tacos的创办人兼大厨的美国韩裔金新翰,昨日在脸书直言,一些客户不遵守社交安全举例,即使已经限制每桌人数,但他们仍然会聚集,在三番四次的规劝也仍然不听劝。 他举例,他在南岸的分店就遇到这种“奥客”。两张分坐五人桌的客人,却聚集在一起,即使被他的员工全说了三四次还是不听劝。“每一次我们都有劝他们不要聚集,但他们只会回复”好的好的“,五分钟后,又开始故态复萌。20分钟后,一名社交距离大使进来,并警告我们如果回来再让他看见这样的情形就开罚单,甚至可能被勒令关闭。” “今晚在荷兰村,又有四人桌和三人卓的客人继续并桌交流。我的经理也上前规劝,奈何他们直接忽视,经理只好给出严厉警告。最终我们只能请客人离开。但客人不愿意。” 无可奈何之下,他们只好报警处理,但现场仍然有客人将照片拍下,并表示将会举报违反社交安全距离的行为,让他相当无奈。 他也在文内呼吁客人应该要遵守社交安全距离,因为不仅仅关系到餐厅的营业,更很可能影响了店内员工的生计。 “对于客人而言,或许违反社交安全规定并不那么重要,但对于餐厅而言,它很可能就是面临生死问题。许多餐饮业可能会被罚上高额罚款,还要被强制关闭10天,都可能是导致餐饮业者倒闭的最后稻草。我们许多员工的生计也取决我们对于此事的处理,故不便之处,敬请理解。” 他在文末也道出该欲违反社交安全距离的客人的结果。他表示,该群客人在警察来到前以离开,因为若他们选择不走,可能将会如同之前在罗拔申码头聚集喝酒的人的下场。 “请勿将餐厅置于这样的情况,因为我相信大多数业者将会选择保护自己和员工,而不是一群被驱逐出境的外籍人士。”…

东盟议员人权组织 敦促狮城政府修正《防假消息法》

东盟国会议员支持人权组织(APHR)认为,新加坡政府欲在国会通过的《防止网络假消息与网络操纵》草案,已经赋予当权者广泛权力遏制评论,已威胁人民的言论自由,故呼吁我国国会议员,在二读辩论时敦促修正上述草案内容,使之符合国际人权准则。 我国国会在本周一至三(5月6日至8日)召开,其中也会二读辩论防假消息法。APHR认为,法案目的虽旨在打击网络造谣信息,以保障社会公共利益,不过有关草案条文也无疑赋予政府过于广泛的权力。 APHR是旨在维护政治自由与促进民主与人权自由的非营利组织团体。 “若《防假消息法》以目前的条文通过二读,将会对新加坡的言论自由带来严重的威胁” APHR在声明中如是强调说道。 “政府有过多的权力介入与管控假消息,而草案中用词定义含糊,易使政府滥用法案。“APHR组织主席查尔斯.圣地牙哥这么指出。 该组织呼吁新加坡国会议员需在国会中,以国际人权标准针对《防假消息法》的内容作出修正。 查尔斯.圣地牙哥目前除了是APHR主席,同时也是马来西亚雪兰莪州巴生区国会议员。 “该法案当中的美中不足的地方,在于并未达到言论自由的国际标准。从法案的内容中可见,当权者再次试图以立法来遏止网络评论。” 查尔斯指出。 实施“恶法”管控言论自由有先例 国内外多个人权组织,包括国际法律家委員會(International…

Associate professor altered post "in view of the sensitives on the ground."

By Yasmeen Banu In recent weeks, the LGBT (Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender)…

Dr Lim Hock Siew

By Dr Wong Wee Nam I first met him at the wake…