Seller Cut An Ice Cream Bar to Make Ice Cream Sandwich or Ice Cream Wafer at Orchard Road from Sarunyu L/Shutterstock.com

For decades, friendly uncles selling ice-cream in their unique carts have been a common sight along Orchard Road. But this familiar sight may no longer be in existence in the near future.
This is because after the current owners’ hang up their license, other individuals can’t take up their license as they hold one that is personal to the holder and non-transferable, said the Singapore Food Agency (SFA).
Although the ice-cream uncles wish to not see their trade die, these individuals won’t be able to do much about it as they cannot transfer their licence to family members or friends who might be interested to take over.
71-year-old Chieng Puay Chui, fondly known as Uncle Chieng to his customers, may be one of the affected ones, along with six others who have been making a living by selling ice-cream along the stretch of the famous shopping street.
Mr Chieng has been an ice-cream street hawker since 1965, and about three decades ago, he moved to Orchard Road outside the old Tangs building to sell this cold treats to his customers. He later moved to his current spot in front of Ngee Ann City, 26 years ago.
“It’ll be a pity if there are no more ice-cream uncles, especially because this is Singapore’s traditional ice-cream. I don’t know if anything will be done to make sure Orchard Road will still have ice-cream uncles in the future,” said Mr Chieng to CNA in Mandarin.
In 2016, Minister for the Environment and Water Resources Masagos Zulkifli said in a written reply to a parliamentary question that street hawkers were given a one-time license in 1994 to control their numbers, and “no more licences were issued after that”.
He explained, “The intention was to phase out these street hawkers through natural attrition and allow such trades to move into proper premises.”
However, Mr Madagos added that the street hawking scheme was temporarily reopened in the early 2000s to provide assistance to those who are needy and not fortunate enough to secure employment.
The ice-cream street hawkers on Orchard Road are given the permission to sell ice-cream and canned beverages in public areas in Singapore as they hold an islandwide license. Mr Chieng described that newer street hawkers are not granted this chance as they hold a licence that only allows them to sell within the town council they live in.
This explains why there are only a small number of ice-cream street hawkers on Orchard Road.
SFA noted that there are roughly about 200 street hawkers who have opted to sell ice-cream.
However, CNA reported that SFA did not comment further on questions raised about the number of street hawker applications to sell ice-cream on Orchard Road it has received, how many were accepted and if it has plans to make sure ice-cream street hawkers will continue to operate in the area.

The trade will slowly disappear

Although Mr Chieng feels it’s a pity to see this trade die off, others are not feeling extremely sad about it.
Tan Ah Hock, who has been selling ice-cream since 1967, expressed that, “I’m quite tired, but I still have to continue to work even if I’m tired.” He added that 75% of his customers are tourists and he wish to retire in two to three years.
Mr Tan also noted that he is not extremely gutted that the trade is dying out. “I’m not very sad. It is what it is,” said the 75-year-old to CNA.
He also remembered that there were more than 30 ice-cream hawkers along Orchard Road about 20 years ago. The majority of them used to flock where Ion Orchard is now located.
Another ice-cream seller Chan Yong Leng feels that this trade will disappear in a few years. Mr Chan, who started this business along Orchard Road in 2000s, said that “technology is taking over and there are nice ice-cream shops in the air-conditioned malls too”.
“There were so many stalls back then and the competition was very strong. Now there are seven, and that’s enough for the whole road,” he mentioned in a CNA article.
The 74-year-old also said that all the seven ice-cream sellers know each other, and they have their own selected place to set their stall. “We won’t go to someone else’s spot to sell ice-cream. In the past, people would fight over that,” the senior citizen noted. He also revealed that he will sell ice-cream in Orchard Road as long as his health allows him to do so.
If that’s not all, most tourists and locals also expressed to CNA that they will miss the ice-cream street hawkers once they are gone for good.
A tourist from the Philippines highlighted that the ice-cream street hawkers “give character” to Orchard Road. “I didn’t know that there are so few let here. It’s like Singapore’s special product, so it’s quite sad,” he noted.
As for Singaporeans, watching these ice-cream street hawkers were part of their childhood. Lucas Lin, remembers buying this sweet and cold treat in his HDB estate and Orchard Road.
Emphasising that the ice-cream street hawkers are an important part of Singapore’s hawker culture, he opined that, “Once they are gone, it will really be a pity. I think we will lose an important part of our traditional heritage. It’s just like seeing hawker centres replaced by food courts.”
He added, “I’m not saying that someone must definitely take over the ice-cream uncles, but if we can still retain this tradition, that would be good. It’s unique to Singapore, just like our hawkers.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【选举】诚邀民众担任监票员 民主党公布志愿者报名时段

新加坡民主党今日(7月1日)的其脸书专页帖文,呼吁民众加入该党的选举监票员行列。“只要你是新加坡国民、非破产人士且没有涉及犯罪案件,即可加入。” 该党欢迎有兴趣的民众可以在明日开始,到该党位于Link@AMK的办公室进行报名。志愿者会获得指导,以及所负责的投票站和桌子号码。 报名时段为今、明和下周二(7月2日、3日和7日)的傍晚6时30分开始,至晚上9时30分;星期六(7月4日)中午12时至晚上9时;下周三(7月8日)下午4时30分至晚上9时30分,以及投票前夕(7月9日)中午12时至晚上9时。

Look who’s bashing Singaporeans

We have noticed that of late, government ministers & officials, and People’s…

剖析《防假消息法》附属条例 是否回应了各界对法案权限的忧虑?

本月2日起,已经公布于宪报的《防止网络假信息和防止网络操纵法案》正式生效。该法自提呈国会以来即备受争议,不仅政界人士,包括国内外学术界、媒体、公民组织等都已对该法提出质疑。 根据政府电子宪报上的通告,尚有其他数个《防假消息法》附属条例也一并发布宪报,包括上诉程序细节、媒体巨头、网络中介的规范等等,以及给与他们时间进行必要的调整,以符合《防假消息法》的条规。 事实上,《防假消息法》草案刚出台,即遭到各界挞伐,提出对赋予部长权力过于广泛、以及可能形成寒蝉效应的忧虑。一些议员、公民组织都曾建议政府再修法,不过在今年5月8日,草案在未经修改下,以72票赞成,九票反对,三票弃权三读通过。 不过,此前律政部长尚穆根在回应官委议员提问时,曾表示将为该法草拟附属条例,那我们且来看看,这些新近公布的条例,是否有回应此前众人对该法表达的忧虑。 忧虑一:法案定义过于笼统 国际法律家委员会(International Commission of Jurists),今年4月中旬曾致函我国领导李显龙及其阁僚,表达对我国《防假消息法》草案的高度关注,认为该法案“定义笼统”,在很多方面都不符合国际司法标准。 工人党议员刘程强在参与草案辩论时,也认为部长可利用法案内假消息的广泛定义条文,根据需要对有关文字是信息还是意见做出选择性的诠释。 不过,就目前在政府电子先报上看到的《防假消息法》附属条例,似乎没有进一步厘清如何解决法案定义过于笼统的问题。 不过,在附属条例第16(1)下,则阐释何谓网络中介和网站持有人,例如拥有每月至少平均50万,来自新加坡的访问用户;而网页持有人/运营者,则指其网站连续三个月,平均每月有10万访客。…

NTUC Foodfare imposes more than $2k ancillary charges on top of $1.6k rental on hawkers

Last week (28 Aug), Makansutra food guru KF Seetoh published a write-up…