At the Singapore Bicentennial Conference held at Raffles City yesterday (30 Sep), Professor Paul Tambyah who is also chairman of the Singapore Democratic Party asked Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat if there was a “good reason” that the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee (EBRC) was not completely independent of the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO).
Prof Tambyah noted, “The election boundaries currently are decided by independent civil servants, but ultimately the reporting officer is somebody in the PMO.”
In his reply, DPM Heng said that the committee is independent and not politically motivated. To do the electoral boundaries properly, population, demographic and other changes have to be looked at, and this requires the views of independent experts, DPM Heng added.
“So, if you look at what they have done, the constituencies, Potong Pasir remains where it is today, Hougang remains exactly the same as it is, and Aljunied in the last election remained as it is,” he tried to explain. “So, I hope you do not doubt the independence of this commission, that they are doing what is right.”
But Prof Tambyah countered, “(They) still report to the Prime Minister.”
DPM Heng responded, “Unless you are saying they have been politically motivated… but you yourself said they are independent!”
The EBRC was formed last month on 4 Sep, seen as the first formal step towards the upcoming GE.
Past habits of re-drawing electoral boundaries

It’s true that constituencies that are held on hand by oppositions do not get redrawn thus far, probably due to the fear of public backlash which may cause the ruling party to lose even more votes.
However, it has been observed that weaker constituencies where the ruling party won by a razor thin margin would likely be redrawn and subsumed into a neighboring stronger constituencies in subsequent elections.
Critics pointed out that this was to prevent the weaker constituencies won by the ruling party from falling into opposition hands in future elections. Certainly, there are no shortage of examples going through past election results:
1. During the 1991 GE, SDP’s Sin Kek Tong secured 47.7% in Braddell Heights. PAP’s Goh Choon Kang beat him by only 1,169 votes out of 27,444 electors. Despite being a SMC from 1976, it was merged into Marine Parade GRC in the subsequent 1997 GE.
2. Then there was Bukit Batok, a SMC established since 1972. During the 1991 GE, PAP’s Ong Chit Chung won Bukit Batok with 51.8%. He beat SDP’s Kwan Yue Keng by only 858 votes out of 24,908 electors. But in the next 1997 GE, Bukit Batok disappeared and was merged into Bukit Timah GRC.
3. Changi SMC was also deemed a weak constituency after the 1991 GE. In Changi, PAP’s Teo Chong Tee beat WP’s Tan Bin Seng by a mere 1,391 votes out of 24,886 electors. PAP won with 53%. Changi had been around as a constituency since 1951 when Singapore was in a partial self-governing phase under the colonial government. But came 1997 GE, Changi SMC was completely disbanded with most part (including Pulau Ubin) absorbed into Siglap ward in the newly created East Coast GRC. PAP won in East Coast GRC through a walkover at the 1997 GE.
4. And in recent times, Joo Chiat SMC was also axed when it was seen “dangerously” close to losing to oppositions during the 2011 GE. Joo Chiat SMC was carved out from East Coast GRC during the 2001 GE. However, PAP’s votes in Joo Chiat kept dropping, GE after GE, thereafter:

  • 2001 GE: PAP won 83.6% with 12,388 majority
  • 2006 GE: PAP won 65.0% with 5,646 majority
  • 2011 GE: PAP won 51.0% with 388 majority
  • 2015 GE: merged into Marine Parade GRC

5. Even GRCs were not spared. With the establishment of the GRC system in 1988, Eunos GRC was one of the then newly established GRCs. In 1988 GE, PAP scraped through by winning with a razor thin 50.9%. To counter the potential loss in the next GE, the GRC was expanded from 3 to 4-person one, thereby, increasing the number of electors from 75,723 to 92,728 for the 1991 GE. Still, PAP only managed to win with 52.4%. Thereafter, Eunos GRC was disbanded and redrawn into East Coast GRC, Aljunied GRC and Pasir Ris GRC for the 1997 GE.
Perhaps DPM Heng might argue that it’s just a pure coincidence.
 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Marina Bay to be graced with 90-minute musical show with fireworks as part of New Year countdown

The Marina Bay Singapore Countdown 2020 is back to usher in the…

前总检察长温长明呼吁 疫情当前责任应优先于个体自由

前总检察长温长明教授,投稿英语媒体《今日报》评论,强调新加坡在对抗冠状病毒19疫情当前,责任应优先于个人自由。有道德观念者,都不可能纵情放任,人们都要意识到,他们的行为如何影响他人。 每个道德准则,都是基于责任,而不是个人权益。这关乎“己所不欲,勿施于人”,而不是每个人都有权被善待。 他也指出,新加坡是人类有史以来,人口密度最拥挤城市,近570万人口住在这里,人口密度近于每平方公里8000人。但新加坡和其他小国不同,国人无法迁移到周边国家来逃避疫情。冠病19 疫情也凸显全球一体的概念,疫情来自一个可能大多数人闻所未闻的城市,如今却成了每个人面对的难题。 而最新的科学证明,要防控疫情,人们应尽量呆在家里,避免于他人不必要第接触。这似乎和一些人随心所欲的本能背道而驰。 在文中,温长明谈到西方国家如在德国柏林,示威者高喊“我们是人民”口号;美国还有持枪激进主义者,要从政府干预下“解放”自己的州属。 但相比下在日本,戴口罩是常见的,他们是给予社会良知,以避免传播咳嗽或感冒。 限制是为了保护他人 为何要有居家通知、戴口罩、社交距离的限制?都是为了保护他人。不幸的是有者明明需居家通知,仍执意外出。 有者可能认为,因违反居家通知,就要判入狱似乎是执法过度。但温长明分析,即便大部分社群都愿意为集体负责,但只要出现一位不负责任的超级传播者,要“行使他的自由权”,都可能引发新一波疫情,那么其他人的牺牲都要前功尽弃了。 “反社会行为,必将造成威胁集体福祉的后果。”温长明认为,法庭做出的判决有两种功能,其一是法律震慑力,避免他人以身试法;其二则是发出明确信号,且不论其他自由主义社会怎么做,但在新加坡,不负责任的态度是不被接受的。 防疫表现应看死亡率…

【选举】即时:李显龙已建议总统解散国会

我国总理李显龙,于今日(6月23日)下午4时发表全国广播。他指已会见总统哈莉玛,并建议申请解散国会,颁布选举令。 他在广播中解释为何目前需需要解散国会,也指现任政府五年任期已结束。 根据今年三月份选区范围检讨委会报告,国会议席从原有的89增至93席,共31个选区,其中集选区17个,单选区14个。 早前选举局也指出,依循卫生部指南,来届选举将无法举办群众大会,而改以线上群众大会。同时,政党拜访一组人不得超过五人,各组人员也不得接触,需遵守一米安全距离。

RSAF to deploy military blimp to enhance its aerial and maritime surveillance capability

The Ministry of Defence (MINDEF) has announced that the Republic of Singapore…