At the Singapore Bicentennial Conference held at Raffles City yesterday (30 Sep), Professor Paul Tambyah who is also chairman of the Singapore Democratic Party asked Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat if there was a “good reason” that the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee (EBRC) was not completely independent of the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO).
Prof Tambyah noted, “The election boundaries currently are decided by independent civil servants, but ultimately the reporting officer is somebody in the PMO.”
In his reply, DPM Heng said that the committee is independent and not politically motivated. To do the electoral boundaries properly, population, demographic and other changes have to be looked at, and this requires the views of independent experts, DPM Heng added.
“So, if you look at what they have done, the constituencies, Potong Pasir remains where it is today, Hougang remains exactly the same as it is, and Aljunied in the last election remained as it is,” he tried to explain. “So, I hope you do not doubt the independence of this commission, that they are doing what is right.”
But Prof Tambyah countered, “(They) still report to the Prime Minister.”
DPM Heng responded, “Unless you are saying they have been politically motivated… but you yourself said they are independent!”
The EBRC was formed last month on 4 Sep, seen as the first formal step towards the upcoming GE.
Past habits of re-drawing electoral boundaries

It’s true that constituencies that are held on hand by oppositions do not get redrawn thus far, probably due to the fear of public backlash which may cause the ruling party to lose even more votes.
However, it has been observed that weaker constituencies where the ruling party won by a razor thin margin would likely be redrawn and subsumed into a neighboring stronger constituencies in subsequent elections.
Critics pointed out that this was to prevent the weaker constituencies won by the ruling party from falling into opposition hands in future elections. Certainly, there are no shortage of examples going through past election results:
1. During the 1991 GE, SDP’s Sin Kek Tong secured 47.7% in Braddell Heights. PAP’s Goh Choon Kang beat him by only 1,169 votes out of 27,444 electors. Despite being a SMC from 1976, it was merged into Marine Parade GRC in the subsequent 1997 GE.
2. Then there was Bukit Batok, a SMC established since 1972. During the 1991 GE, PAP’s Ong Chit Chung won Bukit Batok with 51.8%. He beat SDP’s Kwan Yue Keng by only 858 votes out of 24,908 electors. But in the next 1997 GE, Bukit Batok disappeared and was merged into Bukit Timah GRC.
3. Changi SMC was also deemed a weak constituency after the 1991 GE. In Changi, PAP’s Teo Chong Tee beat WP’s Tan Bin Seng by a mere 1,391 votes out of 24,886 electors. PAP won with 53%. Changi had been around as a constituency since 1951 when Singapore was in a partial self-governing phase under the colonial government. But came 1997 GE, Changi SMC was completely disbanded with most part (including Pulau Ubin) absorbed into Siglap ward in the newly created East Coast GRC. PAP won in East Coast GRC through a walkover at the 1997 GE.
4. And in recent times, Joo Chiat SMC was also axed when it was seen “dangerously” close to losing to oppositions during the 2011 GE. Joo Chiat SMC was carved out from East Coast GRC during the 2001 GE. However, PAP’s votes in Joo Chiat kept dropping, GE after GE, thereafter:

  • 2001 GE: PAP won 83.6% with 12,388 majority
  • 2006 GE: PAP won 65.0% with 5,646 majority
  • 2011 GE: PAP won 51.0% with 388 majority
  • 2015 GE: merged into Marine Parade GRC

5. Even GRCs were not spared. With the establishment of the GRC system in 1988, Eunos GRC was one of the then newly established GRCs. In 1988 GE, PAP scraped through by winning with a razor thin 50.9%. To counter the potential loss in the next GE, the GRC was expanded from 3 to 4-person one, thereby, increasing the number of electors from 75,723 to 92,728 for the 1991 GE. Still, PAP only managed to win with 52.4%. Thereafter, Eunos GRC was disbanded and redrawn into East Coast GRC, Aljunied GRC and Pasir Ris GRC for the 1997 GE.
Perhaps DPM Heng might argue that it’s just a pure coincidence.
 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

“Over-excessive immigration policy” to blame: commenter to Lui

Posting on Minister of Transport Lui Tuck Yew’s Facebook page, commenter Keith…

Competence, messy PR, and a conspiracy theory

~by: Howard Lee~ For all the blunders and perceived partisanship often attributed…

林鼎:为何行动党仍畏惧生活工资?

人民之声党领袖林鼎,质问人民行动党政府为何迄今仍害怕落实生活工资,致使一些工友在全球生活成本最高的国家,却领取难以负担基本生活水准的收入过活。 本月4日,国防部兼人力部高级政务部长扎吉哈,曾声言将探讨餐饮业是否能采纳渐进式薪金模式(PWM)。 林鼎揶揄前者仍在用“行动党式模式”思考,声称餐饮价格可能因此提高;但行动党却忽略了本地“食利者”(rentier,指靠投资收益过活)社会现象。林鼎指出,一些商家也反映,正是租金成本在遏制本土企业的成长。 林鼎偕同该党成员到牛车水向民众拜早年,分发碰柑给民众。他也预祝国人新年快乐,万事如意。 他指出,去年一整年遭受疫情冲击,但似乎来到今年也无法期许生活能尽快恢复常态,全球各地如欧美因疫情仍在封境管制。 当前局势更需要让小商家、普通老百姓度过难关。至于副总理兼财长王瑞杰,早前也宣称在即将到来的预算案将扶助各界,也认为行业需要转型。 “过去30年他们也在说经济转型,却不曾发生,新加坡甚至仍未有生活薪资!” 生活工资指的是足以维持基本生活所需的收入。两年前,李光耀公共政策学院曾发表一项研究报告,显示65岁及以上单身者,每月生活消费至少需1千379元。 林鼎质问:“那还是乐龄人士的,那么年轻人怎么办?”他抨击,行动党政府的渐进式薪金制一点也不“进步”,“如果一些民众收入仍少于1千200元,你不能自称是第一世界国家。” 本地德士司机“全球学历最高”? 他也重申外籍专才议题,认为政府不应只是关注招揽外籍专才,应该让有能力国人把握专业领域工作机会,而不是面对裁员问题、变成德士或私召车司机。他揶揄,新加坡的德士司机俨然是“全球最有学问、学历最高的德士司机。” 尽管王瑞杰提及创新,但林鼎也直言,那么政府就更应该焦点放在栽培中小企业,他预见“未来这几年,更多国人会仰赖中小或微型企业求生存”。…

A 34-year-old man arrested for stealing painting and liquor in Robertson Quay

The Singapore Police Force had arrested a 34-year-old man suspected to be…