At the Real News Matters journalism forum held at the Institute of Technical Education (ITE) College Central last Saturday (28 Sep), Singapore Press Holdings (SPH) Chief Editor Warren Fernandez told the audience that journalists play a critical role amid a proliferation of fake news and views existing today.
With misinformation on the rise, journalists play a crucial role in providing reliable information to support reasoned debate, he said.
“While the world is more connected today and more people have much more information available at their fingertips, the irony is that societies are not necessarily better informed or equipped to make the difficult choices we need to if we are going to address the many challenges we face,” he said.
That is why the work that professional newsrooms do, in fact-checking and ensuring a balanced, objective and unvarnished account of events, is so important, he added.
Mr Fernandez said that democratic discussions cannot happen in the absence of credible and reliable information. “Instead, discussions turn into shouting matches, which tend to be dominated by those with the loudest, most nasty or persistent – or often, the best financed – voices,” he said.
“Each one of us ends up the loser.”
He also warned of the rise of fake news spreading over social media.
Former ST Editor-in-Chief Cheong reveals direct government meddling in media
While Mr Fernandez talked about the importance of ensuring a “balanced, objective and unvarnished account of events” in reporting news, one of his predecessors, retired SPH Chief Editor Cheong Yip Seng, has revealed publicly in his memoir that the People’s Action Party government has the habit of “manipulating” public opinions through Straits Times.
Mr Cheong’s memoir, “OB Markers: My Straits Times Story”, was published in 2012.

In his book, Mr Cheong talked about how PM Lee’s father, Lee Kuan Yew, systematically controlled and meddled with the press. He would routinely pressured ST editors to publish what he wanted to see.
One of the episodes was when Peter Lim, Mr Cheong’s predecessor, resisted Lee’s pressure to print the full ‘O’ level results of opposition politician Chiam See Tong during the 1984 election. Lee wanted to show to voters that Chiam did not have the academic credentials to be a capable MP. Lim resisted because he felt it would backfire on the newspaper.
Mr Cheong also related how Peter Lim, then his boss, had tried to run the newsroom with some form of independence and paid the price by having to resign in 1987. Mr Cheong himself was careful to make sure that he was not going to face that kind of fate. He knew when to give in, when to remain stoic and when to argue — gently, that is — when the “notorious phone calls” came.
And among the many “notorious phone calls” Mr Cheong had to deal with, he revealed one call he got during the 1988 GE when former Solicitor General Francis Seow was contesting as an opposition candidate under Workers’ Party banner in Eunos GRC. With that one phone call, ST immediately stopped covering the election campaign of Francis Seow overnight.
In other words, SPH’s “balanced” reporting suddenly disappeared overnight after one “notorious phone call”. In other first world countries, the newspaper editors, of course, do not have to “take orders” from their government but not in Singapore.
Mr Cheong’s memoir also described the many interventions in Singapore’s media by the government – from appointments of editors to shaping coverage of political and foreign events and even to minor stories like stamp-collecting, carpet-buying and MSG, which the government deemed important for the citizens to know.
Mr Cheong’s memoir is a laudable effort to put on record the astonishing government meddling that editors like Mr Cheong had to deal with regularly.
In any case, according to the latest World Press Freedom Index 2019, Singapore is currently ranked 151st out of 180 countries, behind Russia (149th) and Bangladesh (150th).
 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

社论:竞消委应避偏袒官联企业之嫌

职总创优企业合作社(NTUC Enterprise)将收购Kopitiam集团,视之为符合职总履行社会使命、提供国人可负担的餐饮服务。 与此同时,私召车巨头GRAB收购优步业务,却被竞争消费委员会,判定为违反竞争法,两家公司被罚1千300万新元。 虽是不同个案,但要说上述两起收购交易,同样削减市场的竞争力,值得进一步论证。但,为何两件个案受到的待遇和关注截然不同? 职总企业,正是旗下职总社会企业(包括职总富食客)的控股实体、唯一最大股东。职总富食客经营14食阁、10间咖啡店和9座小贩中心。 KOPITIAM集团旗下则有56家食阁、21间咖啡店、管理三个小贩中心和两个中央厨房。并购KOPITIAM 集团,意味着职总企业几乎垄断本地小贩饮食市场。 若把职总旗下的平价连锁超市(Fair Price)算在内,职总集团实际上已经垄断了从原料到熟食的整条食品供应产业!新加坡竞争监管机构是不是应该好好检视,这种违反市场自由竞争的垄断行径? 如果GRAB和优步并购违反竞争法,职总企业收购KOPITIAM岂能不闻不问?后者并购对市场的破坏比起GRAB优步合并,有过之而无不及! 我可以理解GRAB优步合并,使本国私召车共享科技为单一企业独享。但须知不是所有国人都有使用这服务。 垄断餐饮冲击更大…

Yes to recommendations to improve progression prospects: MOE

By Howard Lee The Singapore government has accepted the 10 recommendations proposed by…

义顺居民提废377A议题 申诉遭李美花议员冷待

推动性少数权益、废除377A的一名自愿者,申诉在会见居民活动,欲向义顺集选区议员李美花提呈请愿书时,却遭后者冷待。 有关名为符宝健(译音)的志愿者,在本周一出席义顺集选区议员李美花的会见活动,想征询议员对性少数权益和废除377A的意见。 同时,符宝健也准备提交一份,有859名该区居民签名,支持废除377A条文的请愿书。 符宝健当晚和三名友人一同出席。轮到他们一行人时,李美花在和众人握手后,首先询问他们之间的关系,其中一人说不是来自义顺选区,但为了同一课题而来。 提交859居民签署的请愿书 不过,李美花要那名非选区居民离开,至于符宝健的另两位义顺同伴,也被要求离开,并再另拿号码排队。 符宝健说,议员称“她知道这是什么情况”,因为“其他议员也遇过”。 “等到我的三名友人离开后,李美花才叫我说出来意。我就告诉她,想了解他对于377A课题的看法。” 符宝健称,李美花听后,只留下一句:“我还有其他居民面对真正的问题”,就离开房间。只留下符宝健一人,被冷待了15分钟。 他说,写信志工有来到房间,但一直避开和他接触,而是与其他居民交谈。最终符宝健告诉他,即便不想和他对话,也好让他转交请愿书给议员。 即便如此,职工也只是挥挥手,请他交给另一名志工。 “感到议员拒绝对话”…

S’pore imposes ‘stricter measures’ for safe distancing amid COVID-19 outbreak, heading closer to the Red DORSCON level measures

After several local COVID-19 cases reportedly had no links to previous cases…