Photo Credit: David Sun/TNP

An undergraduate student from the National University of Singapore (NUS), who molested a woman on three instances at Serangoon MRT station in September 2018, was only sentenced to probation due to his excellent grades in school.
On Wednesday (25 September), District Judge Jasvender Kaur rejected the prosecution’s call to put 23-year-old Terence Siow Kai Yuan behind bars, The New Paper (TNP) reported.
Defending her judgment, Judge Kaur mentioned a few times that the student – who touched the victim twice on her thigh and once at her private parts – as “minor intrusions”. She also added that based on the probation report, it was found that Siow is suitable for probation because his academic results show that he has the “potential to excel in life”, TNP said.
Siow, who pleaded guilty for one charge of outraging the modesty of a 28-year-old woman, was given 21 months of supervised probation. The other two similar charges were taken into consideration.

How it all happened

On 12 September 2018, Siow embarked on a North-East Line train heading towards Punggol station at around 11.30pm. He then spotted a woman with “very long legs” wearing a pair of shorts in the trains, and decided to sit beside her, the court documents stated.
Upon sitting next to her, the NUS undergrad “felt the urge” to touch her. He then used his left hand to touch the woman’s right thigh, and she immediately moved away from him and crossed her leg.
Following that, he placed his hand on her right thigh again, forcing her to shift to another seat before disembarking at Serangoon station.
However, Siow also got off at the same station and followed her as he had the urge to touch her again, the court heard. This time the student took a bolder step and used his finger to touch the woman’s buttocks over her short, while on an escalator.
This then caused the victim to shout at him as he walked away quickly towards the control station. She then went to a station police to notify that she had been molested and pointed to Siow as he was making his way out of the station.
She also made a police report about 1½ hours later, and the student was apprehended at Hougang Avenue three days later, TNP said.

Not the first time

Deputy Public Prosecutor Benedict Chan told in court on Wednesday that the prosecution objected to probation for Siow. Instead, he urged the court to jail him for six weeks, according to TNP.
Citing the probation report, DPP Chan stated that the student admitted to committing similar offences since he enrolled in NUS in 2016. He added that it was troubling to know that Siow was not able to remember the number of times he had committed such acts, calling them “deep-seated habit”.
“The accused knew it was wrong but was emboldened after previous successes. He only sought help after facing the university’s Board of Discipline,” he said.
Additionally, DPP Chan also pointed out that the NUS student was “normal in every sense” and does not have any disorder.
However, Judge Kaur questioned the prosecution’s position on sentencing, highlighting that Siow had “an inability to control his urges”, TNP stated.
“Looking at the nature of intrusion, I would say it is minor,” she explained.
DPP Chan then reminded that Siow had engaged in three such acts, in which Judge Kaur acknowledged it but repeated that “they were minor”.
When Chan mentioned that two of the acts committed by the student involved skin-to-skin contact, Judge Kaur said that it was “just a brief touch on the thigh”.

“He has learnt his lesson”

Pushing for the court to grant probation, Siow’s lawyer Raphael Louis said that the student will be graduating from NUS in one to two years. “He’s getting help, he wants to change, he has learnt his lesson,” Mr Louis said.
Agreeing to him, Judge Kaur said: “I think there can be no doubt that there is extremely strong propensity for reform. He was 22 years old when he committed the offences..and the nature of the acts (is) relatively minor.”
In addition to his 21 months of supervised probation, Siow must also perform 150 hours of community service, and his parents were bonded for S$5,000 to make sure his behaves well.
Speaking to Siow, the judge said, “I have every confidence you will not re-offend and hope you don’t disappoint me,” TNP reported.
For every offence under outrage of modesty, Siow could have been jailed for up to two years, fined and/or caned.

Victim disappointed with the sentence

Speaking to TNP, the victim – whose identity cannot be revealed because of a court-imposed gag order – said that she was “disappointed but not surprised” by the outcome of the case.
She also described Siow’s actions as “premeditated and calculated”, based on an article by Mothership. She also noted that she did not feel a sense of closure about the whole incident.
Apart from that, the woman also took to her Facebook to pen her thoughts about the judgement. She revealed that she has been offered S$5,000 to “compound the case for a lighter sentence”.

Source: Mothership
If that’s not all, she also addressed the case involving Siow as Brock Turner, an American sex offender whose sentence of six months’ jail for raping a woman created a public uproar as many viewed the sentence as too lenient.
“I’m not angry anymore. I am just disappointed that the courts are choosing to treat an adult who has committed multiple sexual offences (not only on me, but on others) as a child, but I am not surprised,” she wrote in the post.
Additionally, she also mentioned that Siow is a math tutor. Based on a local tuition agency called Champion Tutor, Siow also has a profile which stated that he is currently studying Applied Mathematics at NUS, Mothership reported.
Source: Mothership

However, the profile, which has now been taken down, also projected Siow’s cumulative average point (CAP) as 4.39 out of 5.
CAP shows the average grade point of all modules taken by a student. NUS’s website stated that 4.39 would generally signify a B+ to A- average.
A spokesperson from NUS said to TNP that Siow had faced disciplinary sanctions, which included suspension of candidature and mandatory counselling, at a Board of Discipline hearing last October.
The spokesperson also emphasised that NUS looks serious at student misconduct and that disciplinary sanctions will be part of the student’s formal education record at the university.
Separately, TNP noted that Siow is getting help from NUS to keep his sexual urges under control, and he is expected to return to school, but did not mention specifically the date.
Upon reading this news, many netizens were furious knowing that Siow was given such a lenient sentence for such a serious offence. Penning their thoughts in the Facebook pages of Mothership and ST, many of them questioned the verdict given by the judge and the law system in country that favours a certain group of people who are “rich and excels academically”.
  

Others wondered what’s the relevance between good grades and committing a serious crime, as being smart does not indicate one has a good character. They said that a sentence should be given based on the seriousness of the crime and not the academic level of an offender. Yvonne Tan asked, “What’s the use of an excellent bookworm when he do not know the basic principles of respecting others?! Grades does not equivalent to one’s capabilities to value adding contribution to the working society.”
A few questioned if the offender was a less educated person, then would he be given a harsher punishment?

A few asked what kind of message is the judge trying to send across to the people with this light sentence. Renjie Teo wrote, “What are we trying to teach the younger generation? That if you excel academically, you have special privileges from the law?”


On the other hand, Joseph Kee opined that the judge is wrong, urging the prosecution to appeal. “He attempted molest 3 times. What has academic result got to do with this? So a psle dropout will get a different sentence? Is this not double standard,” he wrote.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

散播不实指控视频 前进党一名党员被开除党籍

新加坡前进党开除一名党员Daniel Teo Weilong,后者被指散播含有不适和诽谤性的视频。 坊间流传一段视频,指控前进党已遭外国势力渗透,还点名十名党员,与外界两名非党员合作。其中本地网络媒体fathership.co还报导转载了有关视频。 Daniel Teo Weilong已向该党秘书长陈清木医生承认,有关视频是他制作的。 而前进党经过内部调查后,已决定开除这名36岁党员。 陈清木强调,该党需采取果断行动避免该党声誉因不实谣言和猜测而受损。该党珍视旗下党员,也期望党员共同维护前进党利益。 他指出:“该党不会容忍“任何损害该党信誉的行为。” 这也是前进党第二次开除党员。早前该党已开除Jan Chan,后者在脸书发布发布诋毁伊斯兰教和基督教的贴文。

Hai Bin Prawning closes due to high rent

By Terry Xu – Following the story of Hai Bin Bishan Prawning…

“比中国大陆离谱” 黄之锋谴责新加坡政府提控范国瀚

因为与香港学运领袖黄之锋进行闭门视讯会议交流,新加坡政府将起诉社运份子范国瀚。黄之锋在脸书声援,直批我国政府审查之举,“比中国大陆更离谱”。 范国瀚在2016年11月26日,在新民巷主办“公民抗命即社会运动”论坛,邀请黄之锋透过Skype与现场观众连线对谈交流。 然而,范国瀚也因此被控违反《公共秩序法》,该法要求有外国演讲者的活动,必须事先申请和得到警方许可。针对范国瀚的指控,也在昨日(10月1日)于法庭开审。 黄之锋在脸书贴文表示,范国瀚前年举行闭门论坛,邀请他透过Skype从香港远距离演讲,就因此被提控,直呼新加坡政府做法“比中国大陆离谱”,旨在难以想象当地活动主办者,藉视像会议办论坛也要经过警察审批。 “新加坡作为国际大都会,大量商业会议都用Skype处理,难道所有会议论坛,均要事先向警方申请吗?” 他表示,曾遭马国和泰国拒绝入境,这次连新加坡社运人士也因为与他视讯交流而遭殃,“看来这也反应中国在亚太地区发挥影响力,促使各国封杀在香港争取民主党代表人物。” 在2015年5月,黄之锋受邀赴马国演讲,却被拒入境;在2016年10月,黄之锋曾应邀出席1976年泰国曼谷学运40周年纪念活动,入境泰国时被遣返。 香港众志与社区行动网络联合谴责 黄之锋也是香港众志党(Demosisto)秘书长。香港众志与新加坡非政府组织社区行动网络(CAN)发表联合声明,声援范国瀚。 文告指出,在私人空间进行闭门视讯交流,用逻辑来想也知属私人事务,质疑警方是否有提控之必要。 “集会自由乃基本人权。但是在新加坡,公民为同一共识聚集却往往遭到政府的猜疑。集会只能在唯一地点进行,即便一人也能构成“非法集会”罪行。” 文告谴责,设下诸多恶法,让当权者要提控如范国瀚等社运份子显得绰绰有余,实际上,任何人都可以是被政府对方的的目标。…

新邮政下周三起发售鼠年肖像邮票

集邮迷看过来!为了迎接鼠年,鼠年肖像邮票即将在下周三(8日)开始发售。 新邮政于今日(2日)发文告表示,自8日起,即将开始售出鼠年的邮票,其生肖邮票系列中含两种不同的鼠型插图,价格约0.30元吉1.40元。 新邮政表示,将会特别印制预销首日生肖鼠邮戳(Pre-cancelled First Day Cover)全套邮票,其售价为3.10元,包含两枚邮票的展示包则售价为4.15元。 生肖邮票系列意味着新邮政的12年周期的结束与开始,标志着新邮政迎接未来12年的象征,未来将以生肖作为设计风格。新邮政也表示在接下来的日子直至2031年,均将沿用十二生肖的邮票。 该系列邀请动画师兼插画家Lim An-Ling设计,她也曾为2019年新加坡开埠两百年设计纪念邮票。 此外,新邮政也发行了一系列纪念邮票,包括10元的集邮品,其风格以中国传统剪纸风格呈现,并连同红包与MyStamp鼠主题的产品,放入充满中国色彩的文件夹内,内有8个红包内,售价为18.80元。 为了能早日迎接农历新年,新邮政也以出席团圆晚餐作为其特色,发行限量版微型邮票,价格为8.55元,于1月24日开始发售。 同时新邮政也将在1月23日至2月1日“春到河畔2020”间,于…