This is a follow-up letter from a member of the public, Emmanuel Chin to an earlier letter sent to Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister, Heng Swee Keat, Second Minister of Finance, Indranee Rajah and Senior Minister Teo Chee Hean.
Did the Monetary Authority of Singapore really conduct a thorough investigation before its response* by Ms Sherry (from MAS’ Corporate Communications Division)?
It was claimed that Mr Mohanty would receive no compensation. But the Times of India just stated a list of benefits that “advisers” to the state of Odisha, that Mr Mohanty is one of, enjoys.
“The advisers would get other entitlements like office chambers in Lok Seva Bhawan or on premises of government organisations, personal staff and government quarters.”
The other “advisers” to the state are all political leaders. And Mr Mohanty is also mentioned in the article. The “advisers” stated they would work for free but the article suggest they are more than happy to enjoy their other entitlements. So is MAS’ definition of “no compensation” excluding benefits in kind? That is a very very scary thought.
Public servants in Singapore don’t even get those perks.
And given that the description of the job makes it sound rather involved, how much time away from his MAS job is Mohanty taking?
This should be a cut and dry issue. Either there is no conflict of interest and MAS should be able to easily explain it, or there is one but MAS failed in its duties to the public. Clearly the former is not the case since the news has been ongoing for more than a week yet no satisfactory response has been made.
There are Facebook articles, forum threads, foreign press and yet absolute silence from your agencies.
Someone failed in their due diligence the first time, please dont fail the Singapore people again.


*Ms Sherry in her reply to queries about Mr Mohanty’s possible conflict of interest, said:

“The article referred to in your email incorrectly describes the nature of Mr Sopnendu Mohanty’s engagement with the Odisha Government in India. He is not appointed as a Minister of State and is not part of the Odisha Government.
Mr Mohanty was approached by the Odisha Government to advise them on enhancing financial inclusion through the use of FinTech and digital technologies. He does so in his personal capacity and will not draw any compensation. It does not conflict with his role as the Chief FinTech Officer in the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
As Chief FinTech Officer in MAS, Mr Mohanty’s mandate is to help develop the FinTech sector in Singapore and help create new jobs in this space. He has played a key role in establishing Singapore as a leading global FinTech hub.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

If 377A is repealed, people will realise that other families are just part of the normal variation in society

by Martin Piper I’m very concerned about the comments from National Council…

Appeal to NParks to assist Pasir Ris-Punggol Town Council to implement proper tree management programme after PR-PTC refused to address the issue

by Phillip Ang Dear Kenneth Er, CEO of National Parks Board (NParks),…

High household debt, low growth, low wages, high inflation, low productivity?

By Leong Sze Hian I refer to the Ministry of Trade and Industry’s…

Lighter touch for new media: MICA

MICA says govt looking at how it can take a “lighter touch approach” to New Media. This is in respond to a letter to the Straits Times by Mr Choo Zheng Xi. MICA also says that the Government recognises that the Internet and new media technology have evolved.