Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) logo signage on the building at entrance. (Image by Mimisim / Shutterstock.com)

In general, Singaporeans are fine with rules. The problem only arises when it appears to be one rule for some while another for others. For rules to be respected, it has to be applied consistently and across the board.
Back in 2017, the Public Service Division (PSD) said in a statement to The Straits Times (ST) that civil servants needed to declare additional trade or work that drew income to ensure that there were no conflict of interests.  That statement to the ST followed the fining of a staff sergeant of $2,000 in default of a 2 weeks detention by General Court Martial, for giving 140 rides using the GrabHitch app between October 16 and March 17 2017.
As a general principle, I have no issue with this.
Civil servants are after all paid for out of the public purse and there should therefore be a certain degree of accountability.
Fast forward two years however, it is apparent that this rule seems to have been forgotten when it was announced by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) that it is fine with its Chief Fintech Officer, Mr Sopnendu Mohanty, to also be an adviser to the state government of Odisha concurrently.
The reasoning given my the MAS seems to suggest that because Mr Mohanty is not getting compensated for his role in the Odisha state government which is apparently in his “personal capacity”, there is no conflict of interest. This begs the question, is monetary compensation the sole arbiter of determining whether or not there is a “conflict of interest”?
Surely, Mr Mohanty being in a high position in the MAS will give him access to confidential information. What are the checks and balances to stop him from sharing such information with the state government of Odisha? Do benefits always have to be in monetary in nature? What about contacts, business relationships and connections which can often times be worth much more than immediate monetary compensation?
If I use MAS’s reasoning, shouldn’t dual nationality also be allowed in Singapore? It is not as if, a Singaporean will be gaining monetary compensation for having dual nationality if he or she already lives overseas?
If Mr Mohanty’s dual role in the MAS and the state of Odisha is permitted, why then was a mere staff sergeant fined just for giving Grab rides? It would appear that the stakes of permitting Mr Mohanty’s dual role is far higher than that of a staff sergeant trying to earn some spare cash?
Who decides whether or not something is a conflict of interests? It cannot be applied so unevenly and unfairly.
 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

横撞停车场四车后冲上草坡 宾利复撞灯柱女司机入院

一辆宾利轿车在宏茂桥组屋停车场,疑似失控撞上停车场的三辆轿车和一辆货车,67岁的女司机被送院治疗。 车祸意外于今天(5月29日)上午,在宏茂桥4道第163栋组屋的停车场发生。 署名Liew的网友将有关车祸后的视频和照片分享到社交媒体上,立刻引起网民注意。 据图片和视频,可见宾利轿车的冲劲非常大,将其中一辆停放在停车场的奔驰撞得整个引擎盖脱落,白色货车也有大量刮痕。而宾利轿车在撞了四辆交通工具后,冲上了路旁的草坡,撞上灯柱后才停止。 警方表示已在早上7时16分接获有关的车祸投报,而67岁的女司机被送到邱德拔医院就医,当时她的意识清醒。 警方指出,目前调查仍在进行中。

Judgement – Singapore Court of Appeal Rules that By-Elections are not Optional

On Friday 5th July 2013, the Court of Appeal ruled that the…

余振忠:行动党只有面对强劲竞争才愿意聆听

国务资政兼社会统筹部长尚达曼,昨晚(19日)在脸书发长文,指出此次选举讲永久改变我国政治,不论对朝野政党都是好事。他也阐述本身对民主发展的憧憬,包括续推崇多元族群主义、即使有政治竞争惟社会核心仍稳固,且能对不同观点包容的民主。 工人党前非选区议员余振忠,也在脸书发文,指出他对于尚达曼的憧憬,还要再加上一条,那就是执政党会更公平的竞争。 “请不要假装人民协会是非政治的,在野党议员无法使用人协设施和办活动;也请不要假装总理公署属下的选举局,是完全独立的。” 再者,要申请社区设施提升项目的基金,进行造福居民等计划,在野党议员还得寻求基层组织顾问的批准。他也敦促主流媒体的报导更为中庸、在使用《防假消息法》时当局更应谨慎等等。 在野党管理的选区,各区基层组织顾问一般由落选的行动党参选人担任。 不过,余振忠认为此次选举结果也显示选民变得成熟。他忆述2011年加入工人党,当时就感受到,行动党只有在面对强劲竞争时才肯聆听。过去余振忠便积极在报章论坛或群组反映议题,但似乎决策者未重视这些变革。 “如果要等到行动党严重挫败,再看有没有替代政党崛起,对新加坡来说都会带来影响。任何可靠的替代政党都需要时间去建设,让更多能人良才加入。” 余振忠也对选举结果分析,比起2011年,实际上行动党的选举表现还不赖,但2011年也没有太多能与行动党抗衡的替代候选人。但如今,行动党几乎在全岛都面对严峻的挑战。 选举结果亦说明选民趋向成熟,在普遍安全转移(flight to safety)下行动党品牌仍占优势,仍有选民惧怕迈向未知数,但目前情况正往好的方向转变。

口福集团子公司不再续约 裕廊西小贩中心8月暂关闭

口福集团昨日宣布,基于裕廊西小贩中心生意惨淡,其旗下子公司将在8月约满后,不再续约管理。 口福集团昨日发文告宣布,子公司Hawker Management将不续约管理裕廊西小贩中心,并且会和环境局合作,协助让现有摊贩搬迁到环境局的小贩中心、巴刹,或口福的食阁或咖啡店。集团也表示,摊贩们可以免缴付从6月至租约满期的租金,并提供合格摊贩1000元的搬迁费。 口福集团子公司的管理合约为期三年,将于今年8月6日届满。 当局表示是以社会企业模式经营裕廊西小贩中心,投入了所有资源,岂知效果不理想。为了维护股东和公司利益,经过内部讨论以及和环境局的商议后,决定在约满后退出。 国家环境局指出,随着口福集团的宣布,裕廊西小贩中心估计将会会关闭至2021年下半年。 当局将会向其他业者征求发展方案计划书,并且协助不想继续营业的摊贩转行,为有经济困难的摊贩提供财务援助。 当局指出,裕廊西小贩中心的人流量和租用率在疫情爆发前,就已经偏低,因此除了征求发展方案计划书,环境局也会征求民众的意见和建议,并且可能动工翻新小贩中心,改善布局后,再邀请现有的小贩回来。