At Singapore’s first climate rally organised by Singapore Climate Rally, 23-year-old environmental activist Ho Xiang Tian delivered a passionate speech about the drastic measures that Singapore should take in order to play its part in this battle against climate change.

The rally, which coincided with the global climate change youth movement initiated by Swedish teen environment activist Greta Thunberg, saw over 2,000 participants on the hazy Saturday, 21 September. Despite the low air quality, many people turned up to show their support for the cause and make their voices heard. Many of the participants were young people.

Speaking at the rally, young Mr Ho who is also the co-founder of the informal environmental group LepakinSG, asserted that the world is not in the midst of a climate crisis and that individual action alone is not enough.

“We need systemic change to deal with the climate crisis. We need governments and businesses to act, and we must let them hear our voices,” he said.

Mr Ho said that the messaging from the government and businesses seem to be that if individuals do their part, we can solve climate change.
However, he pointed out that household carbon emissions are far less than emissions by industries. Based on the National Climate Change Secretariat, the projected 2020 business-as-usual greenhouse gas emissions for households is 7.4% compared to 60.3% by industries in Singapore.

Mr Ho says, “It makes no sense to me that we are told to switch off our lights when not in use, but the lights on Jurong Island never seem to be switched off.”

Addressing the government directly in his speech, Mr Ho outlined Singapore’s climate journey starting in 2012 when the country’s first coal-fired power plant came into operation. In 2013, Singapore experienced its most severe haze ever and in 2014, the Jurong Rock Caverns was opened by the government to allow the expansion of Jurong Island which increased the country’s carbon emissions.

In 2015, Singapore adopted the Paris Agreement but is currently not on track to meet the aim of limiting temperature rise to less than 2 degrees.
He then mentioned the massive coral bleaching event in 2016 and the flooding of the MRT tunnels in 2017 which he says shows that “your [the government’s] adaption measures do not always work”.

In 2018, the carbon tax was first proposed at S$10 to S$20 per tonne but was then reduced significantly to only S$5 per tonne.
Finally, in 2019, PM Lee Hsien Loong announced the government’s plan to spend S$100 billion over the next 100 years to adapt to rising sea levels which a result of global warming.

The common thread of these events, said Mr Ho, is that there is little any individual person could have done to about it. The onus lies instead on the government.

“Climate change is not a looming threat, it is already happening. We’re forced to think about it because the climate crisis affects us now. And if we still don’t take strong mitigation measures, it’ll turn into a climate disaster,” warned Mr Ho.

Mentioning his fellow young speakers, aged between 11 to 19, Mr Ho lamented that they shouldn’t have to worry about a future without a stable climate, instead, they should be free to enjoy their youth.

“None of us wants to be worrying about the climate crisis. But we don’t have a choice.”

After observing a moment of silence to honour all that has been and will be lost to climate change, Mr Ho went on to berate the government for staying silent on Singapore’s contributions to climate change.

“Singapore only takes responsibility for 0.11% of the world’s emissions, and that is always the reason cited for our lack of climate action,” said Mr Ho, adding that Singapore is the world’s fifth-largest refinery export hub and that the fuel provided to ships and planes emits carbon at almost three times the national level.

He insightfully pointed out, “We don’t talk about emissions in other countries for the imported products we consume, or from the investments we make. We are happy to reap the economic benefits, but we ignore the carbon emissions that they create.”

Mr Ho urged the government and Singaporeans to start taking responsibility for carbon emissions beyond 0.11%.

Mr Ho urged that coal has to be cut out from the country’s power generation, carbon taxes should be raised to at least S$190 per tonne by 2030 and for the entire country to move away from fossil fuels entirely.

He asserted that we have to act now and that it will require a massive collective effort from the government and business in order for change to happen. As for individuals, Mr Ho called for members of the public to make their voices heard in any way possible to get the message across to the authorities that something has to be done immediately.

“Politicians are right to say that Singapore can’t mitigate climate change alone,” acceded Mr Ho, but added that the country can still make an outsized impact and become a model to other nations in this area.

“But first we have to take really serious climate action. That means no more talk about carbon intensity, individual action, and recycling.”
“There have been countless speeches on the need for climate action. The government doesn’t need reminders of what should be done. They just have to do it,” he emphasised.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

公积金终身入息计划 提早离世遗产不含累积利息?

如果未到退休年龄就过世,您公积金户头里的钱会哪里去? 资深财务顾问暨时事评论人梁实轩,在去年八月的一篇文章表示,其友人曾向中央公积金局询问以上问题,其中一些细节令他细思极恐。 公积金局架设的”areyouready.sg”网站上,以上的问答如下: 用户离世时,其年金保费会如何处理? 您离世后,相关遗产是会遗赠给受益人。如果是公积金年长者终身入息计划(CPF LIFE),有关遗产则是会员离世后,未使用的年金保费和退休账户的余额(如果有的话)。他们都会和该用户剩余的公积金储蓄,遗赠受益人。 然而,年金保费所赚取的利息,并不构成个人会员遗产的一部分,因为它会用于支付终身收入基金(Lifelong Income Fund),让所有终身入息计划会员都能享有每月入息。 与所有年金产品一样,终身入息计划立基于风险共担的概念。为了让会员们都能享有每月入息,必须汇总年金保费的利息,然后再将有关总利息每月入息给该计划下的所有健在成员。因此,公积金终身入息年金保费所赚取的利息,将不会成为个别成员遗产的一部分。 官网回答具误导性 然而,梁实轩指出,在公积金局官网,在有关“终身入息计划-详情-了解-如果我提前离世,我会失去所有的钱吗?”的选项中,却写到:…

志工拿新床铺助知足老奶奶 网民纷纷按赞

本地义工组织“让希望活下去”分享,他们在进行家访时,协助一位知足老奶奶的经历。让网民们备受感动,纷纷表示乐意提供协助。 网友Lee Siew Yian于本月10日上载有关帖文,分享了他们在两天前(8日)傍晚,假明地迷亚路(BENDEMEER ROAD)附近组屋进行家访行动时,震惊于这一对老夫妇所面对的困境,并感动于老奶奶的知足行为。 老夫妇家徒四壁 她指出,当天她和友人到老夫妇家进行访问时,惊见家中地板空空的,没有床铺等,不禁问老奶奶晚上如何过夜的事情。 “我在很‘薄’的床铺上过夜,我的先生在椅子上睡觉。” 老奶奶的回答令网友感到心疼,就表示该组织有送出新的床铺,而且是单人尺寸的,就问老奶奶需要几个。 网友在发问后,还不禁自嘲明知故问,岂知老奶奶只表示“要一个”。 网友当下就无言了,只拿起笔和纸写下了“两个”。 Lee…

强调冠状病毒检测没问题 印尼“零确诊”属上苍护佑

在武汉冠形病毒疫情迅速传播的当前,印度尼西亚再次强调该国的病毒检测程序没有问题,国内没有确诊病例,都是“上苍的护佑”。 据《路透社》指出,印尼卫生部长普特兰托指出,当局从冠状病毒怀疑病例患者身上提取了134个测试样本,包括两名于本周因感染病毒症状而死亡的患者进行检验,但是每个检测结果都呈现阴性。 他表示,若目前所有结果都呈现阴性,那么这个拥有超过2.6亿人口,身居全球第四大人口的国家,就是获得了上苍所给予的护佑。 印尼政府曾于周三指出,该国迄今未出现确证病例,但是不少单位和国家都质疑有关的说辞。 然而,世界卫生组织的印尼代表帕拉妮萨兰则表示,世卫组织对印尼在应对类似情况上所做的准备,充满信心。 医生确认后才检测 报道指印尼的人群检测,比一些邻国来的少,普特兰托则认为,只有在医生确定患者的症状与冠状病毒相似后,才需要进行检测。 “试想像一下,若要检测每名咳嗽或感冒的患者,将要为数百人进行检测。” 据报道,我国一名男子曾在峇淡岛出现发烧和呼吸急促症状,并于2月23日过世,因此曾被传是因冠状病毒而离世。 惟,当地的卫生机构负责人之后表示,该男子是因为另一种未指明的疾病,才出现类似状况且病逝。

GE2015 WP candidate Bernard Chen: Categorisation of cases into “the community” and “migrant worker dormitory clusters” divisive

The categorisation of COVID-19 cases between those in the Singapore “community” and…