The Ministry of Transport and People’s Association issued a joint statement yesterday (18 Sep) saying that at least 192,000 households have benefitted from last year’s Public Transport Voucher Exercise.
The statement also stated that more than $5.8 million have been disbursed to help “needy families” since its commencement on 12 November last year. This is slightly more than half of the $9 million set aside for 300,000 households.
Application for the $30 free voucher is still open till 31 Oct next month for the needy households to apply if they haven’t done so.
“Applications for the 2018 Public Transport Voucher Exercise can continue to be made till 31 October 2019. Households with an income of $1,900 or below, or per capita income of not more than $650 are eligible for the vouchers,” the statement said.
“Eligible households who have yet to apply are encouraged to do so at their local community centres/clubs (CCs). Upon successful application, each household will receive one Public Transport Voucher worth $30, which may be redeemed any time before 31 March 2020.”
CCCs decide who gets additional free transport vouchers
For households that require more help, they can get additional vouchers through the CCs.
“The Citizens’ Consultative Committees (CCCs) will assess each application, and help deserving cases who marginally miss these criteria, or provide additional Public Transport Vouchers to households which may be deemed to need more help. Residents may approach their local CCs if they have any queries,” it added.
So, in the case of opposition held constituencies like Aljunied GRC or Hougang, the WP MPs have no power to decide on the allocation of these free transport vouchers. Only grassroots leaders appointed to CCCs by the losing PAP candidates in these constituencies have the power to decide if additional vouchers could be disbursed to those needy households.
In the joint statement, the Ministry of Transport and People’s Association highlighted the case of Mdm Alimaton Bte Mohd Tahil, 47, who lives in a rental flat in Sembawang with her three children.
Mdm Alimaton shared that the vouchers have helped to defray her transport expenses. She said, “As I needed to go to the hospital for regular follow-up medical checks after undergoing a leg surgery, the $30 Public Transport Voucher came in handy.”
In a blog last September, Dr Vincent Chua, an economics professor at the Singapore University of Social Sciences, pointed out that public transport has become more affordable for lower-income households in Singapore over the past decade.
No doubt, these lower-income households would naturally be grateful to their grassroots leaders and PAP politicians, including those losing PAP candidates like Victor Lye in Aljunied GRC.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Arthur, the stray dog who joined a race team and refused to be left behind

Meet Arthur the stray dog who followed an extreme sports team during…

90% of unemployed residents are Singaporeans?

~ By Leong Sze Hian ~   I refer to the Ministry…

MAS: Forex intervention operations amount to S$42.6 billion net purchases of foreign exchange

On Thursday (10 April), the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) made its…

各界对防假消息法存异议 报业控股与新传媒续缄默

自《防止网络假信息和网络操纵法案》(POFMA)于4月1日提呈国会,引起各界人士声讨与议论,不少维权团体纷纷促请政府再三检讨相关法案,并且呼吁政府修订甚至是撤回相关法案。 其中,亚洲人权与发展论坛 (FORUM-ASIA)与世界公民参与联盟(CIVICUS)随即于4月2日联合发出声明。其重点为检讨该法案内容,认为“政府向本已受严密监控言论的社会大众丢出烟雾弹,以此抑制自由言论与异议。” 他们亦强调,该法案提供当局定义和裁定何谓“真伪消息”的权力,可能会剥削维权人士与团体进行网络评论的权利,并不符合人权法中言论自由的标准。 FORUM-ASIA和CIVICUS致力于保护与加强所有人权,包括发展权,加強全世界公民行动和公民社会的国际非营利组织。 各界对POFMA影响表关注 与此同时,亚洲互联网联盟(AIC)也发出文告说明,相关法律将赋予新加坡政府绝对的酌情权来判定真假消息。AIC表示,该项法案影响深远,政府过度介入已侵犯新加坡人民的自由言论权,必会对新加坡与国际关系带来严重影响。 虽然AIC对政府保护社会和谐、完整性与政治进程的目的表示支持,但对于“缺乏向公众,尤其是各方利益攸关者如企业、媒体、民间团体、种族与国际征询意见”而感到相当失望。 因此,该协会也表明立场,认为《防假消息法》的首要解决方案不应是对付细微差别和复杂的课题。 AIC也指出会积极与政府沟通来处理所谓的“错误信息”,同时也希望此法案不会对公共辩论与公开交流带来影响。 AIC是由互联网与技术公司组成的行业协会,协会成员含苹果、脸书、谷歌、智游网(Expedia group)、亚马逊、LINE、乐天、Airbnb、推特、雅虎以及繽客(Booking.com)。 独立文学出版商《社会思潮出版社》(Ethos…