Source: Yahoo News.

A Singaporean couple who wore anti-death penalty t-shirts at a running event are under investigation for violating tough laws against public protests, police said Wednesday.
The city-state’s laws against dissent and street demonstrations make it illegal for even one person to hold a protest without a police permit.
Nafiz Kamarudin, 38, and his 30-year-old wife wore the t-shirts at a run Sunday organised by local group the Yellow Ribbon Project aimed at showing support for ex-offenders and their efforts to re-integrate into society.
They bore the words “2nd CHANCES MEANS NOT KILLING THEM” on the front and “#ANTIDEATHPENALTY” on the back.
Singapore has steadfastly defended its use of capital punishment for offences like drug trafficking and murder as a deterrent against crime, despite calls from rights groups to abolish it.
Kamarudin, co-founder of a local NGO, told AFP that he and his wife were being investigated for “wearing t-shirts with a message of compassion”.
“Tell me how can you promote the idea of giving ex-offenders a second chance if we send people to their death?”
The Yellow Ribbon Project advocates giving a second chance to former prisoners.
Police said that two people were being probed for offences under the public order act, punishable for first-time offenders with a fine of Sg$3,000 ($2,200). Repeat offenders can be fined Sg$5,000.
The prisons service, which supports the run, said that organisers of the event were made aware a week beforehand that a participant planned to wear a shirt with an anti-death penalty message.
Organisers contacted the man and advised him against using the event as a platform to advocate a cause but Kamarudin and his wife turned up wearing the t-shirts anyway, they said.
As he could not join the main pack with the shirt on, he ran separately on a road alongside the official route. His wife did not take part.
– AFP

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

被遗弃麝猫全身伤只得安乐死 保育组织吁知情人报料助查

关爱动物研究教育协会(ACRES)在脸书分享,指一直麝猫(civet)被遗弃在组屋楼下垃圾槽,被发现是全身是伤,该协会表示目前已和国家公园局合作调查此事,呼吁民众提供线索。 ACRES指在本月16日接到举报,而在勿洛南路第13A座组屋楼下的垃圾槽,发现一只被关在笼里的麝猫。从该协会分享的照片,可见麝猫几乎皮开肉绽,右前腿伤口甚至可见血肉,尾巴皮毛不存。笼里还有放了些食物。 然而, ACRES表示在新加坡野生动物保育集团(Wildlife Reserves Singapore)评估后,认为麝猫伤势已经过重,只得将它安乐死。 对此,该协会呼吁任何知情民众,可拨打该协会24小时野生动物营救和犯罪举报热线:97837782。 麝猫是夜行动物,在新加坡城市和森林地区都可找到它们,但是将之作为宠物收养是犯法的。在《野生动物和飞禽法令》下,任何人若被发现杀害、盗取或无准证私养野生动物,可被罚款1000新元。 一些网民在该协会脸书留言,对虐待动物事件感到愤怒,而协会也表示,由于现场没有闭路电视,所以只得寻求其他方法寻求更多证据。有网民则指出,在组屋电梯或楼梯都至少有个闭路电视,也可以问问组屋的居民。

警方:改过自新可能性高 多因素不提告涉偷拍男生

新加坡警察部队于周二(23日)发文告,阐述针对国立大学偷拍事件中的立场,并驳斥指因为涉事男学生Nicholas Lim的背景,而没有起诉他。同时,列出四个因素,包括评估该名男学生“改过自新的可能性高,而且已经感到懊悔”,所以才决定对他发出为期12个月的有条件严厉警告。 警方在文告中指出,Nicholas Lim的父亲在公共交通领域当司机,而他的母亲是一名家庭主妇。 我国律政暨内政部长尚穆根表示针对有关国大偷拍风波,指示警方发文告阐释立场,并在其脸书专页转发有关警方声明。 多方考量给予改过机会 警方说道,没有起诉涉事男生,也有考量其他因素,包括后者的手机设备中未发现其他色情影像。“一项可能被判入狱的起诉,可能会毁了他的整个未来,并且留下永久的犯罪记录。” 警方表示,考虑到这些因素,Nicholas才因此获得了有条件的警告,意味着他在未来12个月内若凡下任何其他刑事罪,将可能因为这件事和所犯下的罪行一起被起诉,甚至会面临监禁刑罚。 “我们的刑事司法机制,旨在通过相关因素的考量后,为涉事者减轻刑罚和威慑力,提供他们改过自新的机会。” 文告指出,在这种情况下,警方的做法和对其他案件采取的做法“一致”,因为警察部队曾针对类似案件发出了这种有条件警告。“如果涉及其他相关因素,例如涉事者之前的犯罪记录、躲避侦查的预谋等,往往都会起诉。” 教育部长:国大惩处“明显不足” 值得注意的是,我国教育部长王乙康,在昨日才刚发文,指出国大对涉及此事件的男生所采取的处分“明显不足”。…

School of Tomorrow – firing the passion for learning

~by: Elliot Aruldoss~ ~with contributions from: Jewel Philemon~ “We should recognize many…