Inequality measured are biased and play down wealth income, said former Chief Economist of GIC Mr Yeoh Lam Keong at the inaugural Progress Singapore Party’s PSP Talk on poverty in Singapore.
When asked, Mr Yeoh agreed that there is a “distortion” in how inequality is measured in Singapore. However, he explained that if given a choice between improved measuring on how rich people actually are in Singapore versus better statistics that measure poverty, he would prefer the latter.
“Because we don’t have enough even sound poverty measures. Teo You Yenn and Ng Kok Hoe are beginning to do the work that should have been done a long time ago so that we know how many of our citizens are poor, how to target them, how much do they need, or is it too much,” said Mr Yeoh.
He is referring to Assistant Professor Ng Kok Hoe from the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore (LKYSPP) and Associate Professor Teo You Yenn from the School of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University (NTU) who worked on a study recently which aimed to estimate the basic income that an elderly Singaporean would need to survive.
Mr Yeoh reiterated, “If you don’t define the problem, you can’t design around the solutions.”

Should a minimum wage be implemented?

On the topic of whether implementing a minimum wage would help alleviate poverty in Singapore and whether that would increase the cost of living, Mr Yeoh said that he thinks there should be a minimum wage but that it doesn’t need to be legislated.
First, the economist explained that if benefits like the Workfare Income Supplement (WIS) are raised, having a minimum wage would prevent employers from ‘gaming’ the system and reducing wages.
As increasing wages without causing inflation, Mr Yeoh said wages have to “grow organically at the rate of productivity growth.”
He explained, “That’s why it’s going to take 10-15 years. That’s why we need WIS. That’s why over 15 years the problem will work itself out if you’ve got the proper productivity policy.”
In the meantime, measures need to be implemented to support the process.
Moving on, Mr Yeoh went on to talk about how a minimum wage can be arrived at, specifically pointing to the system used in Austria.
“Most of the, a lot of the Nordic countries and Austria do not legislate a minimum wage. However they arrive at it through discussions, through the collective bargaining process between employer and employee.”
This bargaining process is “clear and transparent” and the signals given are based on research by both employers and employees.
“The trade unions have their own research councils. They do the work. They say, ‘this is affordable, you are not raising wages enough or you’re raising it too much. We agree it is here, everybody can afford it’.”
He enthused, “They do not legislate it. They send it as a signal and almost everybody follows it. We do not have to have minimum wage legislated, but we do need a signal.”
Singapore, Mr Yeoh says, already has an instrument to send that signal: the National Wages Council (NWC). Unfortunately, the NWC doesn’t do this.
The reason they don’t do it, said Mr Yeoh, is because Singapore has so many foreign workers for so long. The excess of labour due to Singapore’s “excessive immigration policy” effectively “disempowered” the NWC. But now that there are foreign labour is being restricted, the NWC can do something.
Mr Yeoh noted that the NWC did a pretty good job when it was chaired by Professor Lim Chong Yah.
“Lim Chong Yah has been advocating for minimum wages. He knows what he’s talking about.”
Mr Yeoh asserted that a collective bargaining agreement can be arrived at with the NTUC, the government and the workers and that a tripartite agreement can be made for an indicative minimum wage that will prevent employers from taking advantage of the higher WIS.

Transitioning from foreign to local labour and increasing wages

On the topic of foreign labour, Mr Yeoh was asked where Singapore would draw the line on importing foreign labour and if he agreed that the country needs some foreign workers for certain jobs that citizens are not likely to take up such as keeping the streets clean.
Mr Khush Chopra who was moderating the session, chimed in to say that if street cleaners were paid more, Singaporeans would take up the job.
Mr Yeoh said, “I think it’s a balance.”
“Obviously because we have run our economy so dependent on foreign workers for 20 years, you can’t cut them back immediately,” he added.
The veteran economist explained that cutting back all the foreign workers who “should not have been there in the first place” without having enough local talent to fill in the gap would lead the economy to collapse.
Mr Yeoh elaborated, “So what you need to do is to, going forward, use less and less foreign workers and increase wages by productivity as much as possible so that in 10-15 years’ time, maybe you’ll find half the hotel cleaners are our own people.”
He continued, “In Japan, it’s no sin to be a cleaner. It’s an honourable profession to be a cleaner and they are reasonably well paid. You can earn a decent living being a cleaner in Japan, in Scandinavia. This is what we should be aiming for.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

香港反送中示威陷入僵局 许通美:暴力只会制造更多暴力

“暴力并不会出现让步,而是制造更多的暴力”,这是新加坡巡回大使许通美教授针对近日香港示威者从和平示威升级至暴力冲突的看法。 许通美于周二(22日)在《海峡时报》评论,他观察到,尽管大部分示威者仍谨守承诺,进行和平抗议,但少数示威者的暴力冲突,却损毁示威运动的意义。 “一些示威者以焚烧中国国旗、毁坏总理肖像以及破坏国务院港澳办公室的行为令人无法接受。而且,他们还试图以封闭机场、袭击地铁及破坏私有财产,种种行为都必须受到谴责。” 许通美也表示,香港的部分暴力示威也重创了香港经济与治安良好的名誉。 说到中国的立场时,许通美表示,中国目前的立场是希望香港明白香港是属于中国的一部分,并受到中国主权约束。 “中国不会容忍任何欲要分割香港与中国的企图。中国希望香港人能够热爱中国,如同中国热爱香港。因此,中国不会允许香港成为推翻中国”。他也补充道,中国一直都认为,他们已经做了很多事情来帮助香港,所以香港人应该因此而感到心存感激,而不是表现出敌意。 许通美亦在文章中向香港人“表达善意”,强调新加坡人希望香港人能和平解决此次动荡。 许通美:宜审视香港政治与司法背景 此外,他也强调,要理解香港示威的动机前,必须要先来审视,从过去就设定为民主的香港政治与司法制度。虽隶属中国,但有别于中国其他地区,不被北京政府全面管控。 正如1984年北京与英国在讨论香港的去向时所同意的,将联合国的《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》纳入香港国内法律,就可见一斑。 最终达成一致协议,香港于1997年移交中国,作为中国特别行政区之一,并且能够以一国两制的政策下,享有50年的自治权,同时也将其纳入中华人民共和国宪法第31条内,作为保障香港的权益。 1990年,中国全国人民代表大会批准了《香港基本法》,随后于1997年实施,至此巩固了这项权利。由于香港享有高度自治权,所以港人会抗拒那些被视之为威胁自主权的条例。…

Aussie researcher says S'pore may be 1,000 years old connected to Indian Chola dynasty

A new study made by Australian researcher Dr Iain Sinclair suggests that…

“良才皆入在野党” 林鼎祝贺李显扬加入前进党

人民之声党领袖林鼎律师,在昨日的直播中谈及新加坡的多个问题如新印经济合作协议(CECA)、政府实现CECA的目标、以及新加坡的薪酬水平问题。 直播开始时,他先向近日加入前进党的已故总理李光耀次子李显扬表示祝贺,他表示,这对于在野党而言无疑是个好消息,也成为在野党前进的动力。 “这表明,在野党正获得真正有才华的人才,当然我们也知道李显扬何许人也,事实上,他愿意在如今的政治舞台上站定立场,并和亲哥哥所领导的人民行动党对抗,这无疑将在此次的选举中造成轰动。” 林鼎:若人民之声成执政政府,将废除CECA 接下來,有观众提问有关新印经济合作协议(CECA)的立场,他解释为何会称新印经济合作协议对新加坡是单向且绝对毁灭性的政策,因为并没有新加坡员工前往印度,且新印合作协议的“廉价劳工进口”,已间接导致国人失去收入来源。 因此,他也表明,若人民之声成为执政政府,为保新加坡人的最佳利益,也会希望能够废除新印合作协议,以确保新加坡人能够保住饭碗。 国家发展不能依赖人口疯狂增长 其次,他也谈到,若在新加坡作一千人人口增长的规划,是非常“疯狂的“,忆述已故总理李光耀,将新加坡人口与香港作比较,并理解他的做法是为了能够增广进国内的经济依赖,然而,他提到若要国家繁荣也无需依靠”人口疯狂增长“。 对此,他认为更有效的方法则为促进中小型企业,因为他们和我国七成的劳动力有关。他解释,如今遭遇疫情的打击,这些中小型企业正苦苦挣扎,因此他也希望政府能够为他们设立紧急基金,让他们度过难关。 总理的薪资削减七成,并重新调整部长和高级公务员的薪酬 此外,林鼎也提到新加坡是世界上最不平等的社会,他表示政府如果将不平等视为成功的象征,永远都无法消除不平等的争议,并以向来备受争议的总理月薪和清洁工比较,总理月薪值18万3千元,是清洁工的40倍。 这让许多20至30岁的国人经常感觉自己无法追赶高收入者的行列,并增加许多不安全和绝望感。…

学者:把经济学101理论生搬硬套到公共讨论,很危险

*本文乃节译自:香港科技大学领导力和公共政策学高级讲师刘浩典教授,以及管理顾问吴俊卫(Benjamin Goh)合著的评论,原文于2019年2月20日刊于《海峡时报》。 刘浩典也是李光耀公共政策研究院前副院长,吴俊卫则曾担任哈佛大学知名经济学家格里高利.曼昆(N. Gregory Mankiw)经济学入门课程EC10的教学助理。   诚如经济学格言提到:相对人们的无限欲望,资源总是有限稀缺的。在有关预算的任何讨论中,我们总被一再提醒必须权衡利弊取舍、还有作为社会支柱的社会契约价值观。比方说,很常我们会听到宏观社会开支,对工作积极度会带来负面影响的论述,又或者说,这在财政上难以维续。 然而就好像我们相信科学家提出的科学理论,人们对这些疑似经济学论点,很容易毫无怀疑地会照单全收。 但我们应抵制这种诱惑。与其反映现实经验,许多经济命题更多地表达发表者自己意识形态或信念。举一些我们常听到的经济观点: 自由贸易会让社会里所有人过得更好 最低薪金制会减少就业 一位专业的经济学家对这样的观点给予的肯定更少。他/她会说,这种命题只有在某些(严格)的假设下才能成立。…