Source: Josephine Teo / Facebook, Mothership.sg / Facebook

Back in 2016, Josephine Teo who was Senior Minister of State at the time made a comment in a Straits Times interview where she spoke about how Singaporeans could have children before getting a flat. Specifically, she said: “You need a very small space to have sex”.
At the time, the comment drew the ire of the public. Mrs Teo later said on her Facebook that social media might have interpreted her comment inaccurately.
Three years later, people still remember the comment.
In an interview published on 8 September on Straits Times, Mrs Teo spoke about that comment incident again. She told interviewer Sumiko Tan that she “should not have said” that comment and that she had learnt her lesson.
She said, “I should not have said that. It was meant as a private joke but, you know, when you are in public life, nothing is really private anymore. So lesson learnt.”
In the interview, Mrs Teo also described herself as a straight talker, saying that people who know her are used to it but others might not take well to that side of her.
She explained, “Unfortunately, I think I talk a bit too straight, you know, and some people don’t take very well to that. My husband is used to it, my friends are used to it, the people in my work sphere they are very used to it. It’s like that, I say (it).”
Later, she also talked about how being in the public eye means that what you say can get people “excited” for a variety of reasons.
“To say that you’re not bothered with it in the least bit cannot be the case, but you’ve got to, at some point, say, okay, let it go, and then refocus your energies back to the work,” she added.
However, judging by the comments on the Mothership.sg Facebook page, the people have not ‘let go’ of the comment she made back in 2016. Many pointed out that a ‘private joke’ should not have been made in a public setting:
   
Many also noted that the ‘joke’ itself wasn’t funny and that by saying it, Mrs Teo was making light of a serious matter that affects many Singaporeans:
 
People also called her out for being unprofessional and that the comment was unbecoming of her position as a minister. One person even questioned if the comment was a reflection of her actual thoughts on the matter:


There were also those who pointed out the double standards that a ruling party politician could simply apologise for a comment made in bad-taste with little to no consequences but if the same was done by an opposition politician, the repercussions would have been much worse:

While others were sceptical of the timing of the so-called ‘apology’ or clarification of the comment from three years ago, wondering if maybe this is yet another sign that elections are about to be announced:

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

选前盘点第13届国会议员出席率

国会会议将在七月重启,而如今最受关注的议题,9月可能将引来选举。所以在此之前,本社认为是时候盘点一下各位议员的表现。 其中我们先来看看议员们的出席率。根据数据显示,自2016年来,共有105次的会议,而从未缺席的议员有七位,包括总理李显龙、荷兰-武吉知马集选区议员迪舒沙、义顺集选区议员黄国光、惹兰勿刹集选区议员的潘丽萍、西海岸集选区议员郑德源、丹戎巴葛集选区议员杨益财、非选区议员陈立峰。 然而,正如本社之前的报道,他们可针对特定课题出席辩论,如有事务可离开。那么议员怎样才算出席?只要议员有来到国会报到,露脸下就可被记录作已出席。例如已故建国总理李光耀,晚期一些时候只能待在国会里不到五分钟,也记录为出席。 另一方面,本社也统计出出席率最低的议员,包括通讯及新闻部长易华仁(出席87次)、内政兼律政部长尚穆根(86次)和外交部兼国防部高级政务部长孟理齐(86次),不过他们的缺席原因不得而知。 再来是武吉巴督区议员穆仁理(85次)与现任副总理兼财政部长王瑞杰(84)的缺席次数也算多,但他们缺席是情有可原的。穆仁理在2016年补选才当选,而王瑞杰则是在2016年期间,不幸遭遇中风而缺席养病。 现任总统哈丽玛自2016年担任议员出席国会49次,后来因参选总统而辞去议长以及行动党党职。该年总统选举仅保留给马来族群参加,2017年9月13日,哈莉玛成唯一的总统候选人,但只有她一人获得合格参选证书,使得哈莉玛不战而胜自动当选。 其他出席率较低的包括武吉巴督选区议员王金发,他在2016宣布辞职前出席了五次会议;以及非选区议员符标雄与叶品秀,前者出席了20次,后者则出席23次。 根据新加坡宪法,如果国会议员在未经议长许可下,连续两个月缺席国会会议,将被剥夺议员资格。 而新加坡宪法也指出,依照议事常规要通过任何修法,需有四分之一国会议员(出去议长、副议长或主持会议议员)列席。然而国会里法定人数争议的情况经常发生,如2014年7月7日,国会在通过《辐射防护法令》和《版权法》修法时,议员发现国会里法定人数不足四分之一,以国会议员出席率并不符合法定人数而延迟表决修法。 而根据本社之前的报道,议员月薪约为1万6000元、或等于一年薪酬19万2000元。相当于每出席一次会议的薪酬约为6000元。就官方说法而言, MR4初级部长年薪,乃是基本月薪+第13个月花红, 加上表现花红、年度可变花红(AVC)和国家表现花红的总和,大约为110万新元。…

津贴、保险后医药费仍高 网友忧福利跟不上医疗通膨

一名网友分享友人郑瑞豪(译音)的住院经历,感叹老百姓虽然花钱买保险、还公积金保健储蓄(Medisave),然而真正需要时,获得赔偿额仍难以应付日益高涨的医药费。此事引起网民纷纷留言热议,认识到现有医疗津贴制和保险的局限。 该名网友以此事为例,认为在重度残障情况下,终身护保每月只赔600新元仍有不足,即使无病无痛,最后仍难以索回保费。特别是未来医疗费逐年调涨,我们的公积金、终身健保是否能减轻我们的负担? 郑瑞豪在2018年二月26日,突发心脏病和心脏骤停,在陈笃生医院接受治疗。有两天必须躺在加护病房,随后三天转到普通病房,并接受了气球血管扩张手术(PCI)和植入支架。 他说,政府只津贴1万4000元,终身健保则津贴了1万元,然而自己仅能从公积金保健储蓄(Medisave)提取4千073元,扣了上述数额,自己仍必须承担约1万3千元的医药费。 郑瑞豪在帖文中叹,自己的医药费并没有获得政府津贴65巴仙,医疗储蓄至少有5万2千积蓄,但在当下生死关头,却无用武之地。 一名网友还质疑此贴文的真伪,因为我国公民享用政府医院服务,不论住C级病房或手术,理应至少能得65巴仙津贴,不过郑瑞豪亲自解释,也将当时的医疗收据上载,给众网友评评理:他确确实实为整个治疗服了1万3千余元的医疗费。 郑瑞豪说,完整收据有6页,问题关键不在于每个单一事项,是否获65巴仙津贴,而是在总数额,能够获得多少津贴。“C级病房也没有电视、个人卫生用品和冷气等,我还要请家人带我的个人餐具和杯子。可是一晚住宿在津贴后,仍要价212元,即便是五星级酒店都没那么贵!” 网民Kumar则分享时事评论家Andrew Loh在2016年的境遇:接受血管造影侦测,和诊断是否适合进行血管扩张手术,医药费达1万0727新元。这笔费用或政府津贴6千767.90新元(约65巴仙),终身健保偿还720元,再扣除部分保健储蓄,Andrew先生只需付2千248新元。 至于Andrew的另一心脏绕道手术要价2万5千554新元,政府津贴高达80巴仙即2万0664元;Andrew再用终身健保偿还4千909元,剩余的380元只需用保健储蓄偿还,他根本不需再自掏腰包出一分钱。 (CGH=樟宜中央医院;KTPH=邱德拔医院;NHC=国家心脏中心;NTFGH=黄廷芳综合医院;NUH=国立大学医院;TTSH=陈笃生医院。图源来自卫生部官网) 政府提供基础安全网…

免费口罩派发首日 各派发站活动流畅

政府于周末(2月1日)开始派发免费口罩给全国137万个家庭,出席领取的居民并不多,但是都很有秩序,几乎不用排队就领取成功。 政府于上周四(1月30日)宣布将于周末开始至2月9日,在指定时间或日期,逐步在89个民众俱乐部和654个居委会中心为每户居民派发一包内含四个口罩。 约有1500名新加坡武装部队人员自周四开始,为这520万个口罩派发活动进行部署,新加坡陆军于周末晚上在其脸书帖文,指出已经完成口罩包装,并且送到派发地点。 据《今日报》指出,设于巴西立11大道的第109组屋底层的派发点,在开始活动前就已经有15人排队等候,然而在下午1时40分时开始派发口罩后,排队的居民也在短短的5分钟就领取成功了。 之后,就有不少居民不是前来领取口罩,但是都无需排队了。 有居民受询问时指出,他们是通过新闻报道、组屋或住宅区张贴的告示、邮件通函以及朋友告知,获悉有关的派发口罩活动。 部分住在邻近地区的居民表示,他们在商店街都买不到口罩了,所以决定领取以备不时之需。 一名妇女指出,她目前商店内的口罩已经售罄,因此对政府的派发口罩活动表示感激。 派发站志愿者表示,派发活动进行顺利,在2时15分之前已经分发了约50包口罩。 类似情况也出现在不少派发站,包括蔡厝港3大道第293栋组屋底层的派发站,现场显得非常安静,甚至志愿者人数比居民来得多,让居民们无需排队就能快速地领取口罩。 然而,并非所有的派发站都于2月1日开放至2月9日,如淡滨尼东部、德曼花园组屋区的居民可在2月1日至5日中的两天领取口罩,而大巴窑东部居民则只可以在2月1日至5日中的指定一天领取;欧文路居委会中心派发站则于2月1日、3日和4日,每日开放两三个小时。 错过的民众也不用恐慌,可以到各自的民众俱乐部领取口罩包。…

Workers’ Party supports concerns on climate change, outlines contributions in Parliament

On Tuesday (29 October), the Workers’ Party (WP) expressed its support towards…