Last week on 4 September, the Elections Department announced that the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee (EBRC) had been formed and is “in the midst of deliberations”.
The announcement caught everyone’s attention as the formation of the EBRC is usually a sign that elections are just around the corner.
On Facebook, vocal opposition politician and former member of the Singapore People’s Party (SPP) Jeannette Chong-Aruldoss pointed out that when Worker’s Party MP Pritam Singh had put forth a question in Parliament in July about the formation of the EBRC. MP Chan Chun Sing said in response that it had not been formed yet.

However, Mr Chong-Aruldoss noted that the ED announced that the EBRC had in fact been formed ‘last month’, or sometime in August 2019. As such, she questioned why the formation of the committee wasn’t announced as soon as it was formed.
She highlighted how before the GE2015, the EBRC was only announced two months after it had been formed, and only in response to a question in Parliament.
Ms Chong-Aruldoss said, “Under Singapore’s electoral rules, there is no requirement for an announcement to be made when the EBRC is formed.”
“Perhaps there should be such a requirement, given the paramount importance of GE and the public’s keen interest in and anticipation of the next GE,” she suggested.
Ms Chong-Aruldoss further remarked, “Is the ruling party serving the citizenry to be reticent about the formation of the EBRC, only revealing its formation when asked in Parliament or at the time of the ruling party’s choosing?”
The practising lawyer asserted that Singaporeans are entitled to choose their leaders via free and fair elections.
She added, “In the interest of free and fair elections, it should be made a rule that the EBRC’s formation must be announced upon its formation, rather than its formation only being revealed to the public when the ruling party is asked in Parliament or at the time of the ruling party’s choosing.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

新冠病毒最长潜伏24天? 淡马亚:追踪接触者资料或不全

日前,中国流行病学专家钟南山领导的团队,发表论文称2019新型冠状病毒潜伏期最长可长达24天。 该研究由中国工程院院士钟南山领衔,也是迄今为止样本量最大的一项新冠肺炎回顾性研究成果,已发表于医学研究论文预印本平台medRxiv。研究基于全国552家医院的1099例病例数据,名为《中国2019年新型冠状病毒感染的临床特征》调查报告。 medRxiv亦提醒,该研究尚未经评议,不应用于指导临床实践。其中引起争议的则是报告中提及,新冠病毒的潜伏期介于零至24天,而其极端值也被媒体广为报道,引起关注。 对此,临床微生物学与传染病学亚太学会会长淡马亚(Paul Tambyah)医生分析,潜伏期是指病毒入侵宿主细胞时间,一般不需要很久,其他冠状病毒如沙斯(SARS)病毒的潜伏期为二至七天,中东呼吸道综合征(MERS)病毒为二至14天,流感病毒则是二至四天。 病毒从细胞汲取养分后破坏细胞,接着人体免疫系统消灭被感染的细胞时,病患就会出现症状。 而研究指出,潜伏期中位数为三天,尽管只有三天,但多数呼吸道疾病的病毒最长潜伏期为14天,因此我国实施14天隔离期是适当的措施,而中国确诊病例相当多,追踪接触者手机到的资料也未必百分百准确,可能会出现遗漏。 可能出现二次传染 淡马亚表示,“你可能以为是A传给B,而两者之间可能最后一次接触是在24天前,但这可能是错的,因为中间可能出现C,是C比B早接触A,被感染了再由C传给B。” 淡马亚是接受《联合早报》采访时,这么分析。此前他曾接受《海峡时报》采访,其中也分析坊间戴不戴口罩的疑惑。 淡马亚医生是国立大学医学教授、国大医院传染病学部高级顾问,也是新加坡民主党主席。 另外,上述中国论文并未针对追踪接触者的方法加以说明。…

SPF issues alert to avoid Upper Thompson Road due to overturned truck and oil spillage

Singapore Police Force (SPF) has earlier announced that there was heavy traffic…

PSP’s Lee Hsien Yang urges S’poreans to make their votes count to “end the status quo of the supermajority”

Progress Singapore Party (PSP) member Lee Hsien Yang on Monday (29 June)…