In a stunning display of just how crazy the internet can be, a screenshot has been circulating social media about the woman who was caught on CCTV trying to force her way into an MRT carriage after forcing her way through the closing platform doors.
The screenshot claimed that the woman was merely trying to get to her autistic sister. The thing is, no one really knows where this screenshot came from.
Before we get into that, here’s what happened:
A CCTV footage started to circulate the internet this week showing a woman blocking the platform door from closing and prying them open before squeezing through the space between the doors and the train. She then attempted to pry the train door open to force her way in. Some people rushed to her aid before the train doors fully opened, allowing her to enter the MRT.
The footage was posted on the All Singapore Stuff Facebook page on Tuesday, 27 August.

Channel NewsAsia reported that SBS Transit confirmed that the incident happened around 3:30 pm on Monday, 26 August at the Little India station.
SBS said that as the woman was struggling to open the train doors, a staff onboard activated an emergency device which enabled the doors to follow open and allow the women entry into the carriage.
There was no risk of the train moving off while the woman was struggling as safety design features ensured the train would stay still until both sets of doors were locked.

Why did she do it?

Here’s where it gets interesting. Though there doesn’t seem to be an official statement on why the woman behaved in such a way, a redditor on r/Singapore posted a screenshot of someone claiming to know the woman in the CCTV footage, saying that the woman was just trying to reach her autistic sister who has a history of wandering off and forgetting her way home.
The person in the screenshot said they shared this information to give context for the woman’s actions and so that people can ‘understand her motivations’.
Curiously, there was no source credited to this screenshot. In fact, the moderators of the r/Singapore have tagged the post as unverified. The user who posted the screenshot said they received it via Whatsapp and admitted that the information was not verifiable, and so agreed to the ‘unverified tag’.

Mothership.sg then reported a similar background story on 29 August, where someone claimed to have seen this exact same explanation floating around on Twitter.
https://twitter.com/Rose_Elyza/status/1166768093315485696
The Twitter user, in turn, said they found on Facebook. Though a search shows that the post is no longer on Facebook.
https://twitter.com/Rose_Elyza/status/1166782335619977216
The screenshots in all these social media posts are the same. But if you look closely at the screenshots, it’s clear from the format that it was taken from reddit. Twitter doesn’t have upvotes or downvotes, for a start. In fact, the Twitter screenshot is exactly the same as the reddit screenshot post on 29 August.
If you’re confused, so am I. Let’s lay it out.
Someone on reddit posted this explanation of the MRT incident (date unclear). The post is now nowhere on reddit, so it might have been deleted. On 29 August, a user on Facebook posted a screenshot of that explanation. Then someone shared that Facebook screenshot on Twitter which is what Mothership referred to in their article later on 29 August.
Separately, a reddit user shared the same reddit screenshot on the same day which they said they received via Whatsapp.
It comes full circle. An unverified statement starts on reddits, makes the rounds on different social media networks, ended up in a news article, and then back on reddit again where its validity is questioned.

Crazy internet, eh? A story posted online can take on a life of its own, perpetuated by the forces of internet users.
Anyway, a quick search of the reddit user listed in the screenshot showed no record of this user making that post. The last post the user made was 10 months ago while the last comment was 4 days ago. None of it related to this MRT incident.
Whether or not the post was made and later deleted, we don’t know. The point is, none of this is verifiable. All we know is what the CCTV footage shows and what SBS Transit has said. Everything else is up in the air.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Amidst public clamour, Budget 2020 says GST remains the same for 2021

In today’s Budget 2020 announcement, Finance Minister Heng Swee Keat informed that…

程序出错426战备人员资料外泄 承包公司被罚款4000元

因系统程序出错导致逾400名国家战备人员的个人数据外泄,承包商Option Gift私人有限公司被罚款4000元。 负责处理让战备人员网上兑换积分和礼品系统Uniqrewards的Option Gift私人有限公司,是国防部和内政部的承包商。有关的积分是透过战备人员日常在校培训或课程表现良好,或配合一些庆祝/奖励活动所累积的。 国防部和内政部于去年6月宣布,参与两个奖励计划兑换活动的427名备战人员个人资料,因为该承包商出现错误程序,导致在发送确认电子邮件时出错,战备人员相互收到其他战备人员的个人资料。 没进行足够测试 个人资料保护委员会(Personal Data Protection Commission,简称PDPC)于周四(6月6日)发布报告指出,Option Gift在部署程序之前,没有进行“足够测试”。“作为网站的管理员,该承包商全面拥有和控制在重要时段所收集到、使用、暴露和处理的个人资料。” 报告指出,因此该承包商对相关网站的安全性、任何变动,包括个人资料处理都需要全面负责。…

COVID-19: Govt to enforce stricter social distancing measures, may impose “escalating penalties” to errant entities as S’pore records 40 new cases on Fri

The Government is seeking to enforce stricter social distancing measures and may…

一再回避最低薪资制 我们与“瑞士生活水平”渐行渐远?

日前,瑞士的日内瓦州选民投票。在日内瓦这座全球生活成本最高的城市之一,要让工友活得有尊严,时薪就不能低于23瑞士法郎(约34元),相当于月薪4千086瑞士法郎(或6千071新元)。 日内瓦是继汝拉州(Jura)和纳沙泰尔州(Neuchâtel),成为瑞士第三个实行最低薪金制的城市。 日内瓦选民曾两度否决最低薪金制,但当前受冠病疫情冲击,加深贫富不均鸿沟,如今近58巴仙选民,以及所有当地左翼政党都支持这议案。他们希望能为陷入贫困和不稳定的群体,提供解决之道。 当地时薪甚至高于目前世界上最高的时薪,即澳大利亚的每小时19.84澳元(约19.33元)。日内瓦曾被评为全世界最富裕的城市之一,与我国并列前十。 鄞义林:仍有国人收入低于1236元 对此,旅台博客兼维权人士鄞义林,周二(29日)在脸书上将瑞士与新加坡做对比。他指出,正当日内瓦公民投票决定实行世界上最高的最低工资时,新加坡的外包清洁工友,在渐进式薪金模式(Progressive Wage Model,简称PWM)下却只能赚取区区的1千236元月薪,等同日内瓦最低工资的两成。 “请注意,还有新加坡人的收入低于1千236元。” 渐进式薪金模式(Progressive Wage Model,简称PWM)是人力部等提出的相关计划,旨在扶助保安、清洁、园景和电梯维修等领域工作的低收入户。根据人力部表示,他们均通过培训提升技能和产能,工友获得加薪。…