South China Sea conflict between China and Philippines over Spratly Islands and Paracel islands – 3D illustration for newspaper teasers (Photo by Lenka Horavova from Shutterstock).

Philipines
Beijing told visiting Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte that its position on the South China Sea was not up for negotiation, a spokesman for the leader said Friday.
China claims most of the contested sea, including waters close to Philippine shores, and has rejected a UN-backed international tribunal ruling that said its assertion to the Sea is without legal basis.
Duterte is under growing pressure at home to challenge China — after largely setting aside the standoff for years — with tensions high after a Chinese fishing trawler hit and sank a Filipino boat in June in the contested waters.
In a meeting between the Philippine leader and Chinese President Xi Jinping on Thursday evening, Xi reiterated his government’s position of not recognising the tribunal ruling “as well as not budging from its position”, said Duterte’s spokesman.
The pair agreed to work together to “manage” the issue and recognised “the importance of self-restraint and respect for freedom of navigation in — and overflight above — the South China Sea”, he said.
The decision to raise the issue marks a turnaround for Duterte, who had revived once-icy diplomatic ties with Beijing after being elected in 2016 when he set aside the maritime ruling in favour of wooing Chinese aid, trade and investment.
Renato de Castro, professor of international studies at Manila-based De La Salle University, said Duterte was expected to bring up the issue on his visit to “go through the motions”.
“At this point in time, he has nothing to lose because he has only three years to go”, he said.
“So (he) might as well raise it expecting that President Xi Jinping would basically ignore it or reject it. It’s… a classic charade.”
According to a statement from China’s foreign ministry, Xi said the two countries should “put aside disputes, eliminate external interference” over the South China Sea, and “make greater strides in the joint development of offshore oil and gas” in the region.
Parts of the South China Sea are also claimed by Taiwan, Brunei, Malaysia and Vietnam.
China invokes the so-called “nine-dash line” to mark its historic rights to the territory, which is based on a vague map that emerged in the 1940s.
Despite the territorial issues, Manila and Beijing signed a series of agreements over joint cooperation in fields including education, and Duterte hailed the “friendship and the value of our ties” between the two countries.
– AFP

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

DJ Lim Peifen refutes woman’s claim of double standard at Jewel Changi, says no “preferential treatment” given to her son

Local DJ Lim Peifen of Y.E.S. 93.3 took to her Facebook page…

Dislodged concrete facade had no reinforcement bars, only one in Tampines found to be built as such

It has been found that the concrete facade at a four-storey HDB block…

老组屋屋价下滑 卖房收益恐不足归还公积金

一名民众在社交媒体分享观点,质疑自己在卖掉组屋后,为何归还到公积金户口的钱,还要加上过去累计至今的利率,即使加上卖房子收得收入,还要倒贴。 ”最近,我收到公积金局的请求,要求我把售卖组屋所得,加上利率全数归还到我的公积金户口。“ 我感到惊讶,询问该局职员,我已年届66岁,为何还要把钱还给公积金,他告诉我新的条规不限年龄。 加上累计利率后,结果我要归还给公积金的总额,竟然还多过我卖房子所得。 他们不止要回我从公积金拿出的50巴仙积蓄,还要加上过去二十年来的累计利率。为什么我自己的储蓄也要缴利息?在55岁时我已可领取公积金,为何还要我把钱归还回去? 这已让我陷入财务问题,更何况我还要用我的出去来偿还中介费、律师费、租金、搬运费等等各种琐碎费用。 似乎只有那些年龄超过55岁、卖掉房子的人,才被公积金局告知这项不合理的新规则。” 他希望能有更多人知道并留意这些“细节里的魔鬼”,特别是会影响到年长者卖房后的收益,导致没有足够的钱应付额外的开销。 买房公积金加上利率需归还 金融服务专业协会前主席梁实轩就回应上述民众,指出在现有公积金制度下,当你卖掉房子,你曾用掉的公积金数额加上累计利率,都要归还到你的公积金户口。 在55岁,全额退休储蓄(FRS)的最低储蓄定在17万1000元。超过此数额的其余公积金储蓄才可提取出来。 举例来说,如果你在65岁卖掉房子,你必须把全额退休储蓄加上过去十年累计的利率,全留在你的公积金户口。…

“恐有损总理形象” 《砂拉越报告》非议总理律师团对梁实轩穷追猛打

得理不饶人?早前,时评人梁实轩因误传一篇假新闻惹祸,但即使已经撤下文章并作出道歉,总理的律师团队仍坚决对后者提告,此举亦迎来国际爆料网站《砂拉越报告》的非议。 梁实轩是在11月初,分享了誌期11月5日的State Times Review(STR)文章,标题为《李显龙成为一马公司弊案主要调查对象》。 有关文章指《砂拉越报告》主编克莱尔,针对一马弊案接受访谈,但较后《砂》已澄清有关文章内容不实,要求STR纠正。 故此,梁实轩本身也是假新闻的受害人,在不知情情况下误传失实报导。梁实轩也收到资讯与媒体发展局(IMDA)来函,要求他在在六小时内撤下有关文章,梁实轩也照做无误,并作出道歉。 《砂拉越报告》访问了梁实轩,后者告诉《砂》,他自愿删除有关失实贴文,也承认文章内容不实,但即使这么做,还是被总理律师团队诉诸法律行动,令他感到惊讶。 《砂》形容,如今梁实轩的处境如处在夹缝中进退维谷,无论庭外和解或自我辩护,对他都不利,总理的律师团队似乎要索讨巨额赔偿。 何以要对已道歉的普通老百姓穷追猛打? 对此,《砂》质疑既然资媒局已经对梁实轩采取严厉行动,总理的律师团队还要对这名普通新加坡百姓,采取强硬手段对付? 《砂》质问,梁实轩和他人一样,被假新闻误导,也为此删除贴文并道歉,但何以他还是成了“新加坡最有权势者”的眼中钉,被施以“毁灭性的报复”。 不利总理在民间形象…