If we were to allow the recent controversial rap video by Preetipls and her brother to stay online, then other videos that contain vulgarity and racially offensive content will also have to be allowed, said Law and Home Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam on Thursday (22 August).
By doing so, this would put minorities at the losing end, and worsen racism in Singapore, he explained while speaking at a discussion on race organised by the National University of Singapore’s Department of Communications and New Media (CNM).
In the event, Mr Shanmugam spoke to about 100 university students, staff and general public, at the bi-annual CNM Leaders Summit, where participants got to discuss on political and industry leaders on specific issues.
Last month, Singaporean influencer and comedian Preeti Nair, famously known as Preetipls, along with her brother, rapper Subhas Nair, published a video in response to an advertisement created for e-payment website E-Pay. The ad featured actor and DJ Dennis Chew impersonating different races including a Malay woman wearing a headscarf and had his skin artificially darkened to portray an Indian man. The latter act of artificially darkening skin is referred as ‘Brownface’.
Hoping to point out the problems with the ad, the sibling came up with a rap video in Preetipls’ signature satirical comedy style. But it was laced with expletives and mocked Chinese Singaporeans directly for exploiting minorities for monetary gain, which rubbed people – including the authorities – in the wrong way.
Soon after that, the video was taken down and the Police launched an investigation as reports were filed against the video. On 14 August, the siblings were issued a two-year conditional warning under Section 298A(a) of the Penal Code, Chapter 224 which covers the offence of wounding racial feelings.
Explaining why the racist video had to be taken down at the Thursday’s event, Mr Shanmugam said, “If we allow the line to be crossed…then it’s free for all, the Chinese can be equally offensive, and the minorities will be the losers in such a conversation.”
However, the Minister admitted that having open and honest discussions about race is crucial, but noted that “the only thing that is being objected (in the video) is the tone”.
“When you use offensive language, others will use offensive language and it takes a completely different dimension,” he said, giving the situation in Germany as an example, where political cultural becomes more brutal and violent.
During yesterday’s NUS discussion, the talk on racism caused an active session that there was no time for the other topic (fake news) planned for the afternoon to take place.
The Law Minister pointed out that the laws must be applied equally to all, and if the rap video is allowed, then this means that the Chinese can act in the same way and produce racially offensive videos about Malays and Indians.
“In any society, 95% of the people would not go and do these things and attack another race. But if you allow the 5% to do it, over time that will become 10, 15%. Once it becomes normalised, it’s perfectly normal to talk about each other along these lines,” he explained.
He then asked the crowd, “Then to what extent do you think we will be able to have that kind of interactions we have today, where by and large the races co-exist and conduct relationships on a certain basis of respect and trust?”
When questioned by a member of the audience if the decision to censure the video could have been left to the society, the Minister stressed that the clip crossed the line of criminality.
“If society feels that such a video in the future should not be considered to be in breach, then the law will have to change. And you are the people who are going to determine what laws ought to be, because the laws reflect the social values and mores of society,” he noted, highlighting that the laws will change if the majority thinks so.
If the Government cannot convince the bulk of the people that Singapore should follow the current laws, then it is the leadership’s task to point out directly to the people the consequences of the changes, said Mr Shanmugam.
He also feels that there should be talks, preferably from the ground up, on race and religion.
“It’s a topic that is trending now and people are aware of it. We should discuss it – how do the minorities feel, how do the majorities feel. Have this openness in the conversation,” he told.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

二手烟和刑事正义,孰轻孰重?

工人党主席林瑞莲,本月中旬就10月份的国会会议提呈休会动议(adjournment motion)申请,有意针对近期前女佣巴蒂的判决,讨论刑事司法制度问题。 林瑞莲提呈的动议题为《众人的正义:增强刑事司法系统中的平等》。不过根据国会议长陈川仁脸书贴文,来临国会会议有多达五项休会动议申请,经过抽签决定,林瑞莲的动议未被选中,反之议员黄国光探讨家中二手烟的议题,将在来临国会议事上讨论。 国会将在下周一(10月5日)复会。 前女佣巴蒂案的最新判决,犹如抛下震撼弹,例如法官陈成安点名廖家父子报警“存不良意图”、警方移交赃物的疑点等等,都迫使警方、总检察署等各造需要对事件彻查,民众也期待此案能有个交代。 前进党非选区议员梁文辉直言,现有议会程序似乎未能优先处理更重要议题,未来该党仍会探讨这些缺失。对于巴蒂案,梁文辉也对律政和内政部长尚穆根提出国会提问。 梁文辉询问尚穆根,会否委任一个涵括非政府成员的独立调查委员会,针对巴蒂案的调查和检控,对总检察署和警方发起公共咨询? 梁文辉也关注弱势群体诉诸正义的管道。他询问,对于经济上弱势的外籍人士,是否能设立快捷审讯程序?再者,也应增加高级全职无偿服务律师(CLAS)的报酬,认可他们的贡献。 他也建议,可仿效英国的公设辩护人服务(Public Defender Service),为一些被告提供法律援助;以及增加新加坡警方内部的翻译服务素质 梁文辉表示,该党呼吁针对巴蒂案应设立独立的调查委员会,以检讨此案并建议有效方案,只有如此才能重新赢得民众对刑事司法体制的信任。…

Pulling Singapore out of the slums ?!?

By Narayana Narayana – The September 23 2012 (pg 46) Sunday Times…

Online users raise privacy concerns with the soon-to-be implemented satellite distance-based ERP

Come 2020, the old Electronic Road Pricing (ERP) system will be replaced…