If we were to allow the recent controversial rap video by Preetipls and her brother to stay online, then other videos that contain vulgarity and racially offensive content will also have to be allowed, said Law and Home Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam on Thursday (22 August).
By doing so, this would put minorities at the losing end, and worsen racism in Singapore, he explained while speaking at a discussion on race organised by the National University of Singapore’s Department of Communications and New Media (CNM).
In the event, Mr Shanmugam spoke to about 100 university students, staff and general public, at the bi-annual CNM Leaders Summit, where participants got to discuss on political and industry leaders on specific issues.
Last month, Singaporean influencer and comedian Preeti Nair, famously known as Preetipls, along with her brother, rapper Subhas Nair, published a video in response to an advertisement created for e-payment website E-Pay. The ad featured actor and DJ Dennis Chew impersonating different races including a Malay woman wearing a headscarf and had his skin artificially darkened to portray an Indian man. The latter act of artificially darkening skin is referred as ‘Brownface’.
Hoping to point out the problems with the ad, the sibling came up with a rap video in Preetipls’ signature satirical comedy style. But it was laced with expletives and mocked Chinese Singaporeans directly for exploiting minorities for monetary gain, which rubbed people – including the authorities – in the wrong way.
Soon after that, the video was taken down and the Police launched an investigation as reports were filed against the video. On 14 August, the siblings were issued a two-year conditional warning under Section 298A(a) of the Penal Code, Chapter 224 which covers the offence of wounding racial feelings.
Explaining why the racist video had to be taken down at the Thursday’s event, Mr Shanmugam said, “If we allow the line to be crossed…then it’s free for all, the Chinese can be equally offensive, and the minorities will be the losers in such a conversation.”
However, the Minister admitted that having open and honest discussions about race is crucial, but noted that “the only thing that is being objected (in the video) is the tone”.
“When you use offensive language, others will use offensive language and it takes a completely different dimension,” he said, giving the situation in Germany as an example, where political cultural becomes more brutal and violent.
During yesterday’s NUS discussion, the talk on racism caused an active session that there was no time for the other topic (fake news) planned for the afternoon to take place.
The Law Minister pointed out that the laws must be applied equally to all, and if the rap video is allowed, then this means that the Chinese can act in the same way and produce racially offensive videos about Malays and Indians.
“In any society, 95% of the people would not go and do these things and attack another race. But if you allow the 5% to do it, over time that will become 10, 15%. Once it becomes normalised, it’s perfectly normal to talk about each other along these lines,” he explained.
He then asked the crowd, “Then to what extent do you think we will be able to have that kind of interactions we have today, where by and large the races co-exist and conduct relationships on a certain basis of respect and trust?”
When questioned by a member of the audience if the decision to censure the video could have been left to the society, the Minister stressed that the clip crossed the line of criminality.
“If society feels that such a video in the future should not be considered to be in breach, then the law will have to change. And you are the people who are going to determine what laws ought to be, because the laws reflect the social values and mores of society,” he noted, highlighting that the laws will change if the majority thinks so.
If the Government cannot convince the bulk of the people that Singapore should follow the current laws, then it is the leadership’s task to point out directly to the people the consequences of the changes, said Mr Shanmugam.
He also feels that there should be talks, preferably from the ground up, on race and religion.
“It’s a topic that is trending now and people are aware of it. We should discuss it – how do the minorities feel, how do the majorities feel. Have this openness in the conversation,” he told.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【选举】淡马亚陈清木挑战辩论抗疫方针 易华仁称“应先清楚表明观点”

民主党主席淡马亚教授和前进党党魁陈清木医生,回应原总理李显龙言论。淡马亚指出,如果李显龙不是太脱节的话,理应能发现过去数月在野党都已针对疫情表达看法,甚至警告疫情下选举很鲁莽和危险。 再者在野党对于疫情危机都有清楚的计划,淡马亚自身还写了学术文章、而陈清木则谈讨经济和社会议题。 他再度邀请李显龙和陈振声等人一起公开辩论,好让群众可以明辨是非。 陈清木则指出,行动党认为在野党无法处理疫情,但他表示自己甚至曾与淡马亚已故的医生父亲共事,那时候也曾应对过疫情,倒不如让民众来决定在野党是否合格。 不过,据了解此次再西海岸集选区对垒陈清木的易华仁,则表示“有意辩论者有义务清楚说明观点。”他认为在野党有必要提出防疫方案的细节,并和政府政策对比。 “若要进行辩论,那提出辩论的人,应先清楚表明他们的观点,这样你才能有个对比,才有理由展开辩论。否则就是一个现行的方案,另一边却要求我们辩论但没提出具体方案。”

遇上马拉松赛事大塞车 新人婚宴延迟两句钟开场

渣打银行新加坡国际马拉松赛于周六开跑,不料却引发大塞车,造成许多民众的不便,更让一对新人婚宴延迟开场。 年度渣打银行新加坡国际马拉松赛于11月30日傍晚6点开跑,12月1日落幕,但由于赛事在周末举行,而且选择在高峰期间封路,另又有三场大型活动正同时进行,造成大塞车,引来网民炮轰。 新人夫妇倍感绝望 其中一对新人夫妇恰好在当日举行婚宴,不料现场大部分嘉宾均受困于赛车中,就连新郎父母也受困其中,导致婚宴延迟至晚间9时才开场。 《联合早报》报道,新浪李健铭(33岁,总监)与太太当晚在滨华大酒店(Marina Mandarin)宴请约350名亲友,婚宴前的鸡尾酒会原定7时开始,但仅有一两成宾客到场。 他向记者透露,不仅仅是宾客迟到,就连摄影师与造型师都因此迟到,而父母原定要在下午3时到场梳化,却因赛车三小时,到场后化妆师已离开,只能让亲戚帮忙。 “那期间真的让人很绝望,我们焦虑万分却又无能为力”。 一直到9时左右,宾客陆续到场,他们也正式开席,当时所有流程只能匆忙进行,一些宾客因为时间太晚只能先行离开,二人的婚宴一直拖到晚间11时45分才结束,而两人接近凌晨1时才有时间果腹。 李健铭表示,为了筹备大喜之日,新娘一直亲力亲为,却不曾想到最后败在塞车上,因此压力大到崩溃落泪。 “她对所计划的都无法顺利进行感到失望,我也只能在旁安慰。” 如今两人心情已平复,而选择将此事公开并非为了道歉或赔偿,但希望主办单位能够在安排上有所改善。…

WP : No point debating or arguing over hawker centres issues

In response to the statement released by the Prime Minister Office on…