Mr Samuel Veera Singaram on the first row, next to Minister Josephine Teo.

Singapore Athletics (SA) has acted promptly against one of its affiliates after it received a complaint by athletes and other affiliates abut Singapore Masters Athletics (SMA).
SMA is a voting affiliate of SA, and has been provisionally suspended by SA by what it has termed a “violation” of its tasks. The Advisor of SMA is Member of Parliament Fatimah Lateef.
The suspension comes after athletes and affiliates who signed off on a petition illustrated their concerns over the way the Masters community for track and field athletes was being managed.
The appeal to SA’s President Tang Weng Fei asked that the national body step in to manage the Masters community and also listed areas in which SMA had failed in its mission.
Among the grouses were how the SMA was insisting on qualifying marks and also by instituting minimum attendance at training sessions.
The petitioners felt that these were “contrary to the underlying principle and ethos of Masters athletics”.
Explaining the provisional suspension, which was sent to SMA president Glory Barnabas, Mr Tang told The Straits Times yesterday:
“Because of all these allegations and complaints, we view it as a violation in terms of what they should be doing, so other than submitting the entry for the Asian Masters, it’s just a provisional suspension for them to give us a written explanation so that it should not be extended to a permanent suspension.”
SA has given SMA till 10 September to provide an explanation and has also been asked to provide all documentation and records of its last general meeting.
All SMA activities, including policies, except for registration for December’s Asia Masters Athletics meet in Kuching have been suspended.
The man at the centre of the SMA controversy, its Deputy President Mr Samuel Veera Singaram told the Straits Times that he was taken by surprise by the suspension.
HIs comments to the Straits Times failed to address any part of the concerns raised by the athletes and the affiliates.
He said rather bizarrely that “we feel as representatives of Singapore, you should be proud to present Singapore, proud of the flag.”
He also said that there needs to be “minor checks and balances”.
Mr Singaram is, unfortunately, no stranger to controversy.
He is known to have created issues when he was with Singapore Swimming Association as a technical official.
He was also jailed in 1994 for criminal breach of trust and cheating when he was a manager of the Sembawang Sports Club.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

“无法相信所听见的事实“ 红娘公司创办人分享确诊心路历程

在疫情肆虐之际,患者数不断攀升,但每一数字都代表着一位患者,而每一位患者身上都拥有自己的故事,而我们从不了解,他们自发生症状起至被检测送入医院时,到底带着什么样的心情故事。今天就带大家来了解,患者在入院到底曾经历过什么? 是的,我就是第667号患者,这并不是迟来的四月一号愚人节。 日前,一名网友Violet Lim(林笑岏)披露自己从发现症状、接受冠状病毒19检测,结果呈阳性反应的历程。 也是红娘公司Lunch Actually创办人的她,忆述在3月25日凌晨2点时,突然醒来感觉到头痛,胸口也开始有一股无法形容的胸闷。于是她从床上爬起来到她5米远的地方拿水杯,突然感觉到呼吸急促,但不是一般的气喘,却感觉到呼吸有点困难。 “第一反应是,天啊,这不是冠状病毒19的症状吗?” 林笑岏开始忆述,自己在疫情爆发时都相当谨慎,例如定期消毒和勤洗手、不去拥挤的地方,甚至为了避免大规模感染,她也取消了自己的生日宴。 而且自2月中旬,公司也安排了室内和室外的团队进行工作,而他也属于室外的团队,所以自2月份起,就没有在回到公司,或是遇到任何客户或同事,即指感染的机会较少。 根据卫生部的资料,第667例曾到过美国,属入境病例。 林笑岏在带着各种担心与忧虑下,她决定在隔日早晨去到综合诊所求诊。她也向医生老实交代了个人旅行史后,医生也立即为她开转介信到国家传染病中心。 鼻拭子检测时最痛苦,但医生护士积极乐观对待病人…

Honour in Singapore – Strong government endorsement warranted?

Honour in Singapore” is a mini series by TOC following the recent formation…

家中有自国外返回亲属 学生须休14天缺席假

教育部和社会及家庭发展部指出,基于本地连日来都出现入境确诊病例,为了保护学前和小学学生,当局采取了两个措施,包括敦促家中有来自外国亲属的学生和幼童,都必须留家中14天。 两部门发出联合文告指出,国内连续增加入境的武汉冠状病毒(Covid-19)病例,为了保护年幼学生,将采取两个措施: 从今日(3月25日)起,家中若有自外国回来的亲属,学生都必须休14天的缺席假; 自3月14日或之后,家中有自美国、英国或东盟国家回国的亲属,相关的儿童和幼儿都必须休14天缺席假。缺席假将从相关亲属回国日开始算起。 早前当局也促请自外国回来的学生和学校、幼教及托儿所教职员都必须进行14天缺席假,而目前以上宣布则是附加措施。 当局也鼓励雇主们为了适应目前的特殊情况,为雇员们提供弹性工作安排。 教育部和社会及家庭发展部指出,将继续密切关注局势,并与学校、幼儿园、托儿所、父母和社区合作,确保相关当局的安全。 “我们希望因为相关亲属而必须修缺席假,或居家隔离的学生和教职员,能够注意自己的健康状况,生病时就看医生,并且在康复了才回到校园。”

25本地公民组织联署声明 国家应容许“真诚分歧”捍卫言论自由

25个本地网络媒体、群组和公民组织,包括本社、情义之家、第八功能、MARUAH、CARE等发表联署声明,呼吁新加坡社会应容许“真诚分歧”,并检讨现有限制言论自由的法律规章。 声明表示,公民群体高度关注本地社运分子范国瀚面对的多项控状。2017年,范国瀚被指涉非法集会、破坏公物,且拒绝签署警方口供而被提控。当时本地有六家非政府组织发文声援、6533人联署,并呼吁捍卫言论自由。 此后,多个东南亚和国际组织,都呼吁我国政府撤销掉对范国瀚的诉讼,包括:欧盟国家的一些议员、马国52家公民社会组织、联合国人权委会、人权观察组织、国际特赦组织、CIVICUS、国际法律家委员会、言论自由维权组织“ARTICLE 19”、东盟国会议员支持人权组织(APHR)和亚洲论坛等。 来自各地的声援声浪,再再说明对范的起诉,已经违反了社会共同的愿景,即不论本土公民、非公民居民和海外盟友,都拥有集会、串联、和平抗议、言论和书写的自由,以及能公开辩论棘手课题。 “如果言论自由仅限于芳林花园,那就不是真正的自由。” 即便面对要求撤销范国瀚诉状的舆论和呼声,但是后者还是面对判决。此外,他还因为声援被控被控刑事诽谤的《网络公民》总编许渊臣,在法庭前举起一张A4纸拍照,也因此被警方援引《公共秩序法》调查。 声明指出,对范的控状,如同对公共自由的严重钳制,使得民间追求变革和为不公发声的能力被打压。 “即便政府不认同、不愿接受,我们仍有表达真相的自由,并且为共同关注的课题坦诚交流和行动。” 应容许“真诚的分歧” 诚如非选区议员特斯拉所言,健全的社会必须容许“真诚的分歧”。但是假借公共秩序、防止外国干预或藐视法庭之名,实则打压言论自由的法律规章,都应该严谨检讨。 声明称,过去范国瀚把心血都花在本土各项人权和社会议题,他所表达的关注,其实和所有国人息息相关,而对范的诉讼对国人来说不是好现象。声援范国瀚,也正是共同捍卫国人得以免于恐惧和自由的生活。…